Cover not available

In:Theoretical and Methodological Developments in Processability Theory
Edited by Kristof Baten, Aafke Buyl, Katja Lochtman and Mieke Van Herreweghe
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 4] 2015
► pp. 263–270

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 12. Response Paper

Language Teaching and Learning from a PT Perspective

 | Paderborn University
Published online: 11 December 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/palart.4.12roo
References (13)
References
Bonilla, C.L. (2012). Processability Theory in L2 Spanish: A cross-sectional analysis of an oral corpus. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2008). Outcomes and processes in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Current research from Europe. In W. Delanoy & L. Volkmann (Eds.), Future perspectives for English language teaching (pp. 139-157). Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keßler, J.-U., Liebner, M., & Mansouri, F. (2011). Teaching. In M. Pienemann & J.-U- Keßler (Eds.), Studying Processability Theory (pp. 150-156). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned (4th edn). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nikula, T., Dalton-Puffer, C., & A. Llinares García (2013). CLIL classroom discourse – Research from Europe. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 1, 70-100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. (1984). Psychological constraints on the teachability of language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 186-214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1989). Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 10, 52-79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. & Keßler, J.-U. (Eds.). (2011). Studying Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, P., Mackey, A., Gass, S. & R. Schmidt (2012). Attention and awareness in second language acquisition. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 247-267). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwab, G. (2011). From dialogue to multilogue: A different view on participation in the English foreign language classroom. Classroom Discourse, 2, 3-19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spada, N. & Lightbown, P. (1999). Instruction, first language influence, and developmental readiness in second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 83, 1-22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Baten, Kristof
2019. Teaching the German case system. In Widening Contexts for Processability Theory [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 7], ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue