Cover not available

In:Theoretical and Methodological Developments in Processability Theory
Edited by Kristof Baten, Aafke Buyl, Katja Lochtman and Mieke Van Herreweghe
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 4] 2015
► pp. 21–44

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 2. Processing Alignments

Semantic, Thematic and Structural Prominence in Samoan SLA

 | University of Auckland
 | University of Hawai’i
Published online: 11 December 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/palart.4.02cha
PT proposes two key hypotheses to account for sentence-like structures in early SLA: (i) the Unmarked Alignment Hypothesis says that learners map the most prominent semantic role onto the subject function and the most prominent structural position; (ii) the Topic Hypothesis says that learners do not differentiate subject and topic (Pienemann, DiBiase & Kawaguchi, 2005). This chapter identifies theory-internal problems for these claims, and presents empirical data which shows that they do not hold for Samoan SLA. For theoretical reasons, no NPs produced by early learners can be considered ‘subjects’ and, while initial NPs in early L2 Samoan tend overwhelmingly to be semantically prominent, the converse is not true, initial NPs are not always topical, and semantically prominent NPs may be focal, or background. An account of the observed facts is provided within the framework of LFG without exceeding the procedural capacities accorded to early learners by PT.
References (43)
References
Aissen, J. (1999/2001). Markedness and subject choice in optimality theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 17, 673-711. Reprinted in Legendre, G., Grimshaw, J., & Vikner, S. (Eds.) 2001. Optimality-theoretic syntax (pp. 61-96). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. (1982). The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2001). Lexical functional syntax. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, W. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In C.N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 25-55). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charters, H, Dao, L, & Jansen, L. (2007). Reassessing the applicability of Processability Theory: The Weaver++ model and ESL nominal plural marking. Second Language Research, 27, 509-533. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charters, H., Jansen, L., & Dao, L. (2012). Think of a number: Conceptual transfer in the second language acquisition of English plural-marking. CogniTextes, 8, uploaded Dec 28. <[URL]>Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Choi, H.-W. (1999). Optimizing structure in context: Scrambling and information structure. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, K.W. (1991). The search for subject in Samoan. In R. Blust (Ed.), Currents in Pacific linguistics (Pacific Linguistics, Series C, no 117). Canberra: ANUGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1993). A cognitive account of Samoan lavea and galo verbs. In R.A. Geiger & B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Eds), Conceptualizations and mental processing in language (Cognitive Linguistics Research) (pp. 567-592). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dalrymple, M., & Nikolaeva, I. (2011). Objects and information structure. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W. (1987). Studies in ergativity. New York, NY: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dowty, D. (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67, 547-619. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, N. (2007). Information structure: The syntax-discourse interface. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Falk, Y. (2001). Lexical-functional grammar: An introduction to parallel constraint-based syntax. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1968). The case for case. In E. Bach & R.T. Harms (Ed.), Universals in linguistic theory (pp. 1-88). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, T. (Ed.). (1983). Topic continuity in discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, C-T.J. (1982). Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT.
. (1984). On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 531-574.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keenan, E. (1976). Towards a universal definition of subject. In C.N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 305-334). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kempen, G. & Hoenkamp, E. (1987). An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science, 11, 201-258. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kempen, G. (1998). Comparing and explaining the trajectories of first and second language acquisition: in search of the right mix of psychological and linguistic factors. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1, 29-30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K. (1987). Sentence focus, information structure and the thetic-categorial distinction. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 13th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society.
. (1994). Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. & Long, M. (1991/2014). An introduction to second language acquisition research. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, H.J. (2001). Markedness and word order freezing. In P. Sells (Ed.), Formal and empirical issues in optimality-theoretic syntax (pp. 63-128). Stanford, CA: CSLI. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levelt, W.J.M. (1989). Speaking. From intention to articulation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levelt, W.J.M., Roelofs, A. & Meyer, A.S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, C.N. (1976). Subject and topic. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manning, C.D. (1996). Ergativity: Argument structure and grammatical relations. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mosel, U. & Hovdhaugen, E. (1992). Samoan reference grammar. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muagututi’a, G. (2010). Acquiring Samoan syntax: Ergativity and processability in SLA. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Auckland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pienemann, M., Di Biase, B., & Kawaguchi, S. (2005). Extending Processability Theory. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 199-251). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen. (1981). Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 223-255). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, M. & Levin, B. (2007). Deconstructing thematic hierarchies. In A. Zaenen, J. Simpson, T.H. King, J. Grimshaw, J. Maling, & C. Manning (Eds.), Architectures, rules, and preferences: Variations on themes by Joan W. Bresnan (pp. 385-402). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1982. Pragmatics and linguistics. An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica, 27, 53 - 94Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sato, C. (1982). Form and function in the English interlanguages of two Vietnamese children. Paper presented at the Georgetown University Round Table, pre-conference session on the Analysis of Spoken Discourse, March.
. (1985). Task variation in interlanguage phonology. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 181-196). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1988). Origins of complex syntax in interlanguage development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10(3), 371-95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simpson, J. (2001). Warlpiri morpho-syntax: A lexicalist approach (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xu, L., & Langendoen, T. (1985). Topic structures in Chinese. Language, 61, 1-27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Baten, Kristof & Aaricia Ponnet
2023. Extending PT to split ergative marking and differential object marking. In Processability and Language Acquisition in the Asia-Pacific Region [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 9], ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2017. Understanding Second Language Processing [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 4], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue