Cover not available

In:Germanic Interrelations: Studies in memory of Hans Frede Nielsen
Edited by Stephen Laker, Carla Falluomini, Steffen Krogh, Robert Nedoma and Michael Schulte
[NOWELE Supplement Series 34] 2025
► pp. 82–102

Get fulltext
PDF logo with download linkDownload Chapter PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Chapter EPUB

Unity and diversity in basic color terms

A comparison of Germanic, Slavic, and Romance

ORCiD logo with link | University of California, Santa Barbara
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 6 May 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/nss.34.05com
Abstract
We develop a methodology for assessing the degree of unity versus diversity in Stage V basic color terms in Germanic, Romance, and Slavic languages. We make use of the Glottolog language list, with principled modifications, and of a notion “extended cognate set”, which includes all terms derived from the same etymon plus genus-internal loans. We thus provide a solid underpinning of the intuitive observation that color term diversity is minimal in Germanic, extensive in Romance, and at an intermediate level in Slavic, as well as providing a methodology that should be more generally applicable in lexical typology.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction and methodology
    • 1.1Colors
    • 1.2Languages and sources
    • 1.3Extended cognate sets
    • 1.4Database
  • 2.The data: Qualitative analysis
    • 2.1Germanic color terms
      • 2.1.1Germanic black
      • 2.1.2Germanic white
      • 2.1.3Germanic red
      • 2.1.4Germanic green
      • 2.1.5Germanic yellow
      • 2.1.6Germanic blue
      • 2.1.7Germanic summary
    • 2.2Romance color terms
      • 2.2.1Romance black
      • 2.2.2Romance white
      • 2.2.3Romance red
      • 2.2.4Romance green
      • 2.2.5Romance yellow
      • 2.2.6Romance blue
      • 2.2.7Romance summary
    • 2.3Slavic color terms
      • 2.3.1Slavic black
      • 2.3.2Slavic white
      • 2.3.3Slavic red
      • 2.3.4Slavic green
      • 2.3.5Slavic yellow
      • 2.3.6Slavic blue
      • 2.3.7Slavic summary
  • 3.Quantitative analysis
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Abbreviations used in the article and online database
  • References
References (32)
References
Berlin, B. & P. Kay. 1969. Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Catalan dictionary. 1993. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Claassen, S. A. 2021. Color terms across Europe: An investigation of the interaction between color terms and European language families. RU:ts 2. [URL]
Crawford, J. 2016. Bleikr, gulr, and the categorization of color in Old Norse. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 115: 239–252. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, I. & G. Corbett. 1994. The basic colour terms of Russian. Linguistics 32: 65–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. Genealogical language list. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds.): The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. [URL] (consulted 2022-07-08)
Dunn, M., S. J. Greenhill, S. C. Levinson & R. D. Gray. 2011. Evolved structure of language shows lineage-specific trends in word-order universals. Nature 473: 79–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dworkin, S. N. 2016a. A diachronic overview of color terms in the Romance languages: The lexical stability of the Latin color vocabulary. In J. P. Silvestre, E. Cardeira & A. Villalva (eds.), Colour and colour naming: Crosslinguistic approaches, 9–20. Centro de Linguística da Universidade de Lisboa / Universidade de Aveiro.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016b. Lexical stability and shared lexicon. In A. Ledgeway & M. Maiden (eds.): The Oxford guide to the Romance languages, 577–587. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eberhard, D. M., G. F. Simons & C. D. Fennig (eds.). 2021. Ethnologue: Languages of the world. 24th edn. Dallas: SIL International. [URL] (consulted 2021-08-25)
Faltings, Volkert F. 2020. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der friesischen Adjektiva. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferreira, V., I. Schulze, P. C. Vicente & P. Bouda. 2015. Dicionário bilingue piação-português. Minde: CIDLeS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, Anna. 1978. Strutturazione della terminologia dei colori nei dialetti sardi. In V. Pisani & C. Santoro (eds.): Italia linguistica nuova e antica: Studi linguistici in memoria di Oronzo Parlangèli II, 163–181. Galatina: Congedo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hammarström, H., R. Forkel, M. Haspelmath & S. Bank. 2021. Glottolog 4.4. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL] (consulted 2021-08-25)
Huber, M. & the APiCS Consortium. 2013. Chapter 116: ‘Green’ and ‘blue’. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (eds.): The atlas of pidgin and creole language structures, 464–467. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kay, P., B. Berlin, L. Maffi, W. R. Merrifield & R. Cook. 2009. The World Color Survey. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kristol, A. M. 1978. Color: Les langues romanes devant le phénomène de la couleur. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1979. Il colore azzurro nei dialetti italiani. Vox Romanica 38: 85–99.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1980. Color systems in southern Italy: A case of regression. Language 56: 137–145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroonen, G. 2013. Etymological dictionary of Proto-Germanic. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Majid, A., F. Jordan & M. Dunn. 2014. Semantic systems in closely related languages. Language Sciences 49: 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nielsen, H. F. 1989. The Germanic languages: Origins and early dialectal interrelations. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
OED = Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [URL] (consulted 2023-07-10)
Rubin, A. D. 2017. Judeo-Italian. In L. Kahn & A. D. Rubin (eds.): Handbook of Jewish languages. Rev. and updated edn, 298–365. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandford, J. L. 2012. Blu, azzurro, celeste — what colour is blue for Italian speakers compared to English speakers? In M. Rossi (ed.), Colour and colorimetry: Multidisciplinary contributions, Vol. VIII B, 281–288. Rimini: Maggioli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sjölin, B. 1969. Einführung in das Friesische. Stuttgart: Metzler. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teixeira Moláns, P. 2021. Os termos para as cores en galego: unha selva por explorar. Revista Galega de Filoloxía 22: 89–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomason, S. G. & T. Kaufman. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uusküla, M. 2014. Linguistic categorization of blue in Standard Italian. In W. Anderson, C. P. Biggam, C. Hough & C. Kay (eds.): Colour studies: A broad spectrum, 67–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wagner, M. L. 1917. Das Fortleben einiger lateinischer, bzw. vulgärlateinischer Pferdefarbennamen im Romanischen, insbesondere im Sardischen und Korsischen. Glotta 8: 233–238.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woll, D. 1975. Blau und blond. Zum Ursprung zweier europäischer Farbbezeichnungen. In H. Meier (ed.): Neue Beiträge zur romanischen Etymologie, 342–367. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue