In:From West to North Frisia: A Journey along the North Sea Coast
Edited by Alastair Walker, Eric Hoekstra, Goffe Jensma, Wendy Vanselow, Willem Visser and Christoph Winter
[NOWELE Supplement Series 33] 2022
► pp. 418–431
Get fulltext
The closed vowels in West Frisian revisited
On the mismatch between phonetic duration and phonological length
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 10 March 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/nss.33.23vis
https://doi.org/10.1075/nss.33.23vis
Abstract
In most of the literature on West Frisian, it is assumed that this language has a symmetrical vowel system, consisting of nine short and nine corresponding long vowels. These vowels all occur in minimal pairs, meaning that this distinction has phonemic value. This traditional view was challenged in De Haan (1999), where an asymmetrical classification is proposed in which the closed vowels /i/, /y/ and /u/, in spite of their short duration, are considered to be long vowels. In this paper, I want to assess the pros and cons of this asymmetrical classification, add some new arguments in favour of it, and come up with a representation of /i/, /y/ and /u/ which captures both their phonological length and phonetic duration.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.In support of the asymmetrical classification
- 2.1Arguments pertaining to the distribution of vowels in the phonological word
- 2.2Phonotactic arguments
- 2.3A diachronic argument
- 3.Exceptions
- 4.The phonological representation of the closed vowels
- 5.The representation of diphthongs
- 6.Concluding remarks
Notes References
References (14)
Gilbers, D. G., W. Visser & J. Weening. 2012. Het verschil tussen de lange en korte hoge vocalen in het Fries en de invloed hiervan op de realisering van de Nederlandse hoge vocalen door Friestaligen. Us Wurk, 61. 69–90.
Graaf, T. de. 1985. Phonetic aspects of the Frisian vowel system. NOWELE 5. 23–40.
Haan, G. de. 1999. Frisian monophthongs and syllable structure. Us Wurk 48. 19–30; also published in: J. Hoekstra, W. Visser & G. Jensma (eds.). 2010, Studies in West Frisian Grammar, Selected papers by Germen J. de Haan (= Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 161), 331–340. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Hoekstra, J. 1995. Ta it stamlûd fan Nijfrysk húnje/hune. Tydskrift foar Fryske Taalkunde 10. 12–15.
Knevel, N. & D. G. Gilbers. 2005. Hoge vocalen en het diminutiefsuffix in het Nederlands. TABU 34. 159–170.
Language Portal Dutch/Frisian/Afrikaans. [URL]
Oostendorp, M. van. 1995. Vowel quality and phonological projection (doctoral dissertation, University of Tilburg); also published as: Oostendorp, M. van. 2000. Phonological projection. A theory of feature content and prosodic structure. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Visser, W. 1997. The Syllable in Frisian (doctoral dissertation, Free University, Amsterdam).