Cover not available

Article published In: NOWELE
Vol. 70:1 (2017) ► pp.57–72

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Borrowing, incomplete lexical diffusion and the High German tenues shift

 | Georgia College
Published online: 20 April 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.70.1.04cal
Building on Callender 2012, this paper argues that residue from the High German tenues shift may be the result of incomplete lexical diffusion (as opposed to later northern borrowing). Although unshifted forms rarely appear in OHG texts (see Braune 2004 [1886]), an examination of the TITUS corpus and Schützeichel 1995 revealed that their shifted counterparts were also largely absent. This suggests that these forms were simply not the types of words written in OHG texts. Incomplete lexical diffusion thus remains a plausible explanation. I also argue that affrication and spirantization may have been phonologically (perceptually) abrupt. Furthermore, there was little distinction between the two post-vocalically for old short stops, a position where affricates do not survive today.
References (51)
Bauer, E. 1957. Dialektgeographie im südlichen Odenwald und Ried. Marburg: Elwert.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Braune, W. 1874. Zur Kenntnis des Fränkischen und zur hochdeutschen Lautverschiebung. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 11. 1–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1886. Althochdeutsche Grammatik. Halle: NiemeyerGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. Althochdeutsche Grammatik I. Laut- und Formenlehre. Ingo Reiffenstein (ed.), (15th edition). Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinkmann, H.. 1941. Der lautliche Vorgang der germanischen und der hochdeutschen Lautverschiebung. Archiv für vergleichende Phonetik 51. 10–20; 77–89.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bromm, E. 1936. Studien zur Dialektgeographie der Kreise Marburg, Kirchhain, Frankenberg. Marburg: Elwert.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bruch, R. 1953. Mittelfränkische Relikte des Zwischenstadiums der Affrikata in der Lautverschiebung zur Spirans (kreits “Kreis”). Zeitschrift für Mundartforschung 231. 129–47.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bubner, R. H. 1935. Untersuchungen zur Dialektgeographie des Bergischen Landes zwischen Agger und Dhünn. Marburg: Elwert.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fourquet, J. and P. Valentin. 1962. Althochdeutsche Phonemsysteme (Isidor, Tatian, Otfrid, Notker). Zeitschrift für Mundartforschung 291: 341–56.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frings, T. 1957. Grundlegung einer Geschichte der deutschen Sprache. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gippert, J., J. Martínez, & A. Korn. (Updated June 28, 2013). Thesaurus Indogermanischer Text- und Sprachmaterialien (TITUS). <[URL]>.
Goblirsch, K. 2005. Lautverschiebungen in den germanischen Sprachen. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haubrichs, W. 1979. Georgslied und Georgslegende im frühen Mittelalter. Königstein: Scriptor.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hennig, B. 1998. Kleines Mittelhochdeutsches Wörterbuch. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, K. 1900. Laut- und Flexionslehre der Mundart der Moselgegend von Oberham bis zur Rheinprovinz. Metz: Buchdruckerei der Lothringer Zeitung.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hogg, R. 1988. On the Impossibility of Old English Dialectology. In: D. Kastovsky & G. Bauder (eds.), Luick Revisited, 183–203. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006. Old English Dialectology. In A. van Kemenade and B. Los (eds.), The Handbook of the History of English, 395–416. Malden: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hommer, E. 1915. Studien zur Dialektgeographie des Westerwaldes. Marburg: Elwert.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Honeybone, P. 2001. Lenition Inhibition in Liverpool English. English Language and Linguistics 5, 2. 213–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jardon, A. 1891. Grammatik der Achener Mundart. I. Teil: Laut- und Formenlehre. Aachen: Cremer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. 1988. Phonological Change. In: F. Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey. Vol. I. Linguistic theory: Foundations, 363–415. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1995. The Phonological Basis of Sound Change. In: John Goldsmith (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 640–670. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, P.. 1855. Die Sprache der Luxemburger. Luxemburg: Buck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroh, W. 1915. Beiträge zur nassauischen Dialektgeographie.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuhl, Patricia K. 1991. Human Adults and Human Infants Show a “Perceptual Magnet Effect” for the Prototypes of Speech Categories, Monkeys Do Not. Perception & Psychophysics 50, 2: 93–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuntze, E. 1932. Studien zur Mundart der Stadt Saarbrücken. Deutsche Dialektgeographie 311. Marburg: Elwert.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, W. 2007. Transmission and Diffusion. Language 83, 2. 344–387. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lerchner, G.. 1971. Zur II. Lautverschiebung im Rhineisch-Westmitteldeutschen. Diachronische und diatopische Untersuchungen. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matzel, K.. 1970. Untersuchungen zur Verfasserschaft, Sprache und Herkunft der althochdeutschen Übersetzungen der Isidor-Sippe. Bonn: Röhrscheid.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mettke, H. 1983. Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik (5th edition). Leipzig: VEB Bibliographisches Institut.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Münch, F. 1904. Grammatik der ripuarisch-fränkischen Mundart. Bonn: Cohen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nordmeyer, G. 1936. Lautverschiebungserklärungen. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 351. 482–495.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ohala, J. 1993. The phonetics of sound change. In C. Jones (ed.), Historical Linguistics: Problems and Perspectives, 237–278. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paul, H. 1989. Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik (23rd edition). Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Penzl, H. 1971. Lautsystem und Lautwandel in den althochdeutschen Dialekten. Munich: Hueber.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prokosch, E. 1933. A Comparative Germanic Grammar. Baltimore: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roedder, E. 1936. Volkssprache und Wortschatz des Badischen Frankenlandes dargestellt auf Grund der Mundart von Oberschefflenz. New York: Modern Language Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sapir, E. 1933. The Psychological Reality of Phonemes. Reprinted in Mandelbaum (ed.) 1949, Selected Writings of Edward Sapir in Language, Culture, and Personality, 46–59. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scheer, T. 2005. How Minimal is Phonological Change? Folia Linguistica Historica 251. 69–114.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schützeichel, R. 1956. Zur ahd. Lautverschiebung am Mittelrhein. Zeitschrift für Mundartforschung 241. 112–24.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1976. Die Grundlagen des westlichen Mitteldeutschen (2nd edition). Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1995. Althochdeutsches Wörterbuch (5th edition). Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sendlmeier, W. 2000. Lautsprachliche Informationsverarbeitung beim Fremdsprachenerwerb. In: U. A. Kauzner (ed.) Pronunciation and the Adult Learner: Limitations and Possibilities, 113–128. Bologna: CLUEB.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simmler, F. 1974. Die westgermanische Konsonantengemination unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Althochdeutschen. Münsterische Mittelalter-Schriften 19. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steinmeyer, E. 1916. Die kleineren althochdeutschen Sprachdenkmäler. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tarral, N. 1903. Laut- und Formenlehre der Mundart des Kantons Falkenberg in Lothr. Strassbourg: Heitz and Mündel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Voyles, J. 1974. The Phonology of the OHG Isidor. In: Probleme der Historischen Phonologie, 69–106. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Welter, W. 1938. Die Mundarten des Aachener Landes als Mittler zwischen Rhein und Maas. Bonn: Röhrscheid.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilmanns, W. 1911. Deutsche Grammatik. Gotisch, Alt-, Mittel- und Neuhochdeutsch (3rd edition). Straßburg: Trübner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, Charles. 2006. The Infinite Gift. How Children Learn and Unlearn the Languages of the World. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Hinskens, Frans
2020. The Expanding Universe of the Study of Sound Change. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue