Cover not available

Article published In: NOWELE
Vol. 68:2 (2015) ► pp.227–250

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The Split Infinitive in Middle English

Published online: 24 July 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.68.2.05cal
A split infinitive construction denotes a type of syntactic tmesis in which a word or a phrase, especially an adverb, occurs between the infinitive marker to and the verb. The early instances of the split infinitive in English date back to the 13th century, when a personal pronoun, an adverb or two or more words could appear in such environments (Visser 1963-1973 II: 1038-1045). This paper investigates the split infinitive in Middle English with the following objectives: a) to trace the origin and development of the construction; b) to analyse the nature of the splitting adverb in terms of its etymology and lexico-grammatical features; and c) to examine the prosodic patterns contributing to the acceptance of particular splitting combinations. The source of evidence comes from the following corpora: Helsinki Corpus of English Texts, Innsbruck Corpus of Middle English Prose, Penn-Parsed Corpora of Historical English, Middle English Medical Texts, Middle English Grammar Corpus, and the Malaga Corpus of Late Middle English Scientific Prose.
References (65)
Baker, Sh. 1980. Comments on Comments on Splitting Infinitives. College English 42(1).90-91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blake, N. (ed.). 1992. The Cambridge History of the English Language. Volume II 1066-1476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bödtker, A.T. 1912. The Split Infinitive. Modern Language Notes 27(7).229-230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bryant, M.M. 1946. The Split Infinitive. The English Journal 35(7).403-404. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burchfield, R.W. & H.W. Fowler. 1996. The New Fowler’s Modern English Usage. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Calle-Martín, J. 2009. Line-final Word Division in Late Middle English Fachprosa . In J.E. Díaz-Vera and R. Caballero (eds.), 35-53.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Line-final Word Division in Early English Handwriting. In J. Thaisen & H. Rutkowska (eds.), 15-29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Notes on the Decline of the Unsupported Negative Adverb ne in Middle English. In J. Martín Arista, R. Torre Alonso, A. Canga Alonso & I. Medina Barco (eds.), 89-102.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Calle-Martín, J. & A. Miranda-García. 2009. On the Use of Split Infinitives in English. In A. Renouf & A. Kehoe (eds.), 347-364. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. From the Manuscript to the Screen: Implementing Electronic Editions of Mediaeval Handwritten Material. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 46(3).3-20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Calle-Martín, J. & J. Romero-Barranco. 2012. On the Use of the Split Infinitive in the Asian Varieties of English. Paper Presented at the 34th International Conference of ICAME (International Computer Archive of Modern and Medieval English) . Santiago de Compostela, May 22-26 2013.
Close, R.A. 1987. Notes on the Split Infinitive. Journal of English Linguistics 20(2).217-229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crystal, D. 1984. Who Cares about English Usage? London: Penguin.
. 1985. A Case of the Split Infinitives. English Today 31.16-17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. The Cambridge Encyclopaedia of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Curme, G.O. 1914. Origin and Force of the Split Infinitive. Modern Language Notes 29(2). 41-45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davenport, M., E. Hansen & H.F. Nielsen (eds.). 1983. Current Topics in English Historical Linguistics. Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Díaz Vera, J.E. & R. Caballero (eds.). 2009. Textual Healing: Studies in Medieval English Medical, Scientific and Technical Texts. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dobson, E.J. 1976. The Origins of Ancrene Wisse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elspaß, S., N. Langer, J. Scharloth & W. Vandenbussche (eds.). 2007. Germanic Language Histories “from Below” (1700-2000). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fanego, T. Infinitive Marking in Early Modern English. In F. Fernández, M. Fuster & J.J. Calvo (eds.), 191-203.
Fernández, F., M. Fuster & J.J. Calvo (eds.). 1994. Papers from the 7th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Valencia, 22-26 September 1992. Amsterdam, Phil: John Benjamins.
Fischer, O. 1992. Syntax. In N. Blake (ed.), 206-408.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. Infinitive Marking in Late Middle English: Transitivity and Changes in the English System of Case. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), 109-134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, R. 2007. To Boldly Split the Infinitive – or Not? In S. Elspaß, N. Langer, J. Scharloth & W. Vandenbussche (eds.), 259-274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fisiak, J. (ed.). 1997. Studies in Middle English Linguistics. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foster, D.W. 1978. A Transformational Justification for English Split Infinitives. In D. Nehls (ed.), 85-94.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gelderen, E. van. 1989. The Historical Rationale behind Split Infinitives and Kindred Constructions. Archiv fur das Studium der Neueren Sprachen und Literaturen 226(1).1-18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, F. 1882. On the Separation, by a Word or Words, of To and the Infinitive Mood. The American Journal of Philology 3(9).17-24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huntsman, J.F. 1980. Two Comments on Peter Neely’s ‘To Split or Not To Split’. Col-lege English 41(6).696-699. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iyeiri, Y. 2001. Negative Constructions in Middle English. Fukuoka, Japan: Kyushu University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. 1933. Essentials of English Grammar. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kemenade, A. van 2000. Jerspersen’s Cycle Revisited: Formal Properties of Grammaticalization. In S. Pintzuk, G. Tsoulas and A. Warner (eds.), 51-74.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koivistoinen, E. 2012. Acceptable or Not? Split Infinitives in American English. Unpublished BA Thesis. University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lass, R. 1992. Phonology and Morphology. In Norman Blake (ed.), 23-155.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, R.E., H. Kurath, & H.M. Kuhn (eds.). 1952-2001. Middle English Dictionary. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Online version in Middle English compendium, edited by Frances McSparran. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000-. [URL]. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lutz, A. 1986. The Syllabic Basis of Word Division in Old English Manuscripts. English Studies 67(3).193-210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malone, K. 1941. The Split Infinitive and a System of Clauses. American Speech 16(1).52-54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Markus, M. 2010. Manual of the Innsbruck Middle English Prose Corpus. Version 2.4. Innsbruck: ICAMET.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martín Arista, J., R. Torre Alonso, A. Canga Alonso & I. Medina Barco (eds.). 2012. Convergent Approaches to Mediaeval English Language and Literature: Selected Papers from the 22nd Conference of SELIM . Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Mazzon, G. 2004. A History of English Negation. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McIntosh, A., M.L. Samuels & M. Benskin. 1986. A Linguistic Atlas of Late Medieval English. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Minkova, D. 1983. Middle English Final –e from a Phonemic Point of View. In M. Davenport, E. Hansen & H.F. Nielsen (eds.), 191-210.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. The History of Final Vowels in English: the Sound of Muting. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miranda-García, A. & J. Garrido-Garrido. 2012. Text Search Engine. Málaga: University of Málaga. [[URL]].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mitrasca, M. 2009. The Split Infinitive in Electronic Corpora: Should There Be a Rule? Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics 21.99-131.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mustanoja, T.F. 1960. A Middle English Syntax. Helsinki: Societé Néophilologique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neely, P.M. 1978. To Split or to Not Split. College English 40(4).402-406. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nehls, D. (ed.). 1978. Studies in Descriptive English Grammar. Heidelberg: Groos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perales-Escudero, M.D. 2011. To Split or Not to Split: the Split Infinitive Past and Present. Journal of English Linguistics 39(4).313-334. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Phoocharoensil, S. 2012. The English Split Infinitive: A Comparative Study of Learner Corpora. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning 1(1). 1-12.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pintzuk, S., G. Tsoulas & A. Warner (eds.). 2000. Diachronic Syntax: Models and Mechanisms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poutsma, H. 1929. A Grammar of Late Modern English. Part I: The Sentence. Groningen: Noordhoff.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Powell, M.S. 1984. Word Division. English Studies 65(5).452-458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech & J. Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Renouf, A. & A. Kehoe (eds.). 2009. Corpus Linguistics: Refinements and Reassess-ments. Amsterdam – New York: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schlüter, J. 2005. Rhythmic Grammar. The Influence of Rhythm on Grammatical Varia-tion and Change in English. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, W.M. 1959. The Split Infinitive. Anglia. Zeitschrift für Englische Philologie 77(3).257-278.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stroheker, F. 1913. Doppelformen und Rhythmus bei Marlowe und Kyd. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strunk, W. & E.B. White. 1935/2000. The Elements of Style. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, I., P. Pahta & M. Mäkinen. 2005. Middle English Medical Texts. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thaisen, J. & H. Rutkowska (eds.). 2011. Scribes, Printers, and the Accidentals of their Texts. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Visser, F.T. 1963-1973. An Historical Syntax of the English Language. 4 vols1. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, K.G. 1993. The Columbia Guide to Standard American English. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Ronan, Patricia & Gerold Schneider
2023. “To boldly go where no man has gone before”: how iconic is the Star Trek split infinitive?. Linguistics Vanguard 9:s3 ► pp. 247 ff. DOI logo
FROLOVA, E.A
2021. SEMANTICS OF THE CONSTRUCTIONS WITH SPLIT INFINITIVE. BALTIC HUMANITARIAN JOURNAL 10:34 DOI logo
Bech, Kristin & George Walkden
2016. English is (still) a West Germanic language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 39:1 ► pp. 65 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue