Old English deadjectival paradigms
Productivity and recursivity
Published online: 9 April 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.68.1.02urr
https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.68.1.02urr
This article focuses on Old English derivational paradigms with adjectival bases and assesses their productivity and degree of recursivity. On the theoretical side, the article puts forward the concept of paradigmatic productivity in order to gauge the relative importance of lexical categories as bases of word-formation. On the descriptive side, the analysis identifies the basic adjectives of Old English, gathers their derivatives, assigns a base of derivation to each deadjectival lemma and lists the instances of recursive word-formation. The main conclusions of the research are that the derivational paradigms of adjectives are not as productive as the ones based on strong verbs and that recursive formations result from affixation far more often than from compounding and zero derivation.
Keywords: recursivity, derivational paradigm, word-formation, Old English
References (28)
Bammesberger, A. 1965. Deverbative jan-Verba des Altenglischen, vergleichend mit den übrigen altgermanischen Sprachen dargestellt. München: Ludwig-Maximilians U.
. 1992. The place of English in Germanic and Indo-European. In R. Hogg (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language I: The Beginnings to 1066, 26-66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baayen, R.H. 1989. A corpus-based approach to morphological productivity. Statistical Anlysis and Psycholinguistic Interpretation, PhD thesis, Free University, Amsterdam.
Baayen, R.H. & R. Lieber 1991. Productivity and English derivation: a corpus-based study, Linguistics 291.801-843
Bosworth, J. & T.N. Toller. 1973 [1898]. An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark Hall, J.R. 1996 [1896]. A Concise Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Haselow, A. 2011. Typological Changes in the Lexicon. Analytic Tendencies in English Noun Formation. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Heidermanns, F. 1993. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der germanischen Primäradjektive. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Hinderling, R. 1967. Studien zu den starken Verbalabstrakten des Germanischen. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Kastovsky, D. 1968. Old English Deverbal Substantives Derived by means of a Zero Morpheme. PhD Dissertation. Tübingen: Eberhard-Karls-U.
. 2006. Typological Changes in Derivational Morphology. In A. van Kemenade & B. Los (eds.), The Handbook of The History of English, 151-177. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lass, R. 1994. Old English. A historical linguistic companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martín Arista, J. 2008. Unification and separation in a functional theory of morphology. In R. Van Valin (ed.), Investigations of the Syntax-Semantics-Pragmatics Interface, 119-145. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2009. A Typology of Morphological Constructions. In C. Butler & J. Martín Arista (eds.), Deconstructing Constructions, 85-115. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2012. The Old English Prefix Ge-: A Panchronic Reappraisal. Australian Journal of Linguistics 32/4.411-433.
. 2013. Recursivity, derivational depth and the search for Old English lexical primes. Studia Neophilologica 85/1.1-21.
. Lexical layers and noun formation in Old English. Forthcoming.
Plag, I. 1999. Morphological Productivity: Structural Constraints in English Derivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Torre Alonso, Roberto
García Fernández, Laura
Rodríguez, Darío Metola
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
