Cover not available

Review article published In: NOWELE Volume 53 (May 2008)
[NOWELE 53] 2008
► pp. 83–94

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Review article

Marie Stoklund, Michael Lerche Nielsen, Bente Holmberg & Gillian Fellows-Jensen (eds.). Runes and their Secrets. Studies in Runology. 461 pp. 73 figures + 14 tables.

 | Volda University College
Published online: 1 May 2008
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.53.07sch
References (36)
Bibliography
Antonsen, E. H. 1975. A concise grammar of the oldest runic inscriptions, Sprach-strukturen A. Historische Sprachstrukturen 31. Tübingen. Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bammesberger, A., and D. Parsons. 2003. ‘Runenreihen. §2. History of the Anglo-Saxon and Frisian fuþorc .’ In: H. Beck et al. (eds.), Reallexikon der Germanischen altertumskunde (2nd ed.), 251. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Pp. 564–67.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barnes, M. P. 1987. ‘The origins of the younger fuþark – a reappraisal’. Runor och runinskrifter, Kungl. Vitterhets Historie och Antikvitets Akademien, Konferenser 15. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International. Pp. 29–45.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006. ‘Standardised fuþarks: A useful tool or a delusion?’ arkiv för nordisk filologi 1211:5–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beck, H. 2006. ‘Das fuþark und Probleme der Verschriftung/Verschriftlichung’. In: A. Bammesberger and G. Waxenberger (eds.), Das fuþark und seine einzelsprachlichen Weiterentwicklungen. akten der tagung in eichstätt vom 20. bis 24. Juli 2003. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter. Pp. 61–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Braunmüller, K. Forthcoming. ‘The inscriptions of the older futhark: Imaging actual speech or a certain text type?’ In: P. Poussa and P. Ambrosiani (eds.), The futhark and the fur trade. International workshop held at the University of Umeå, September 14–16, 2005. Umeå: Kungl. Skytteanska Samfundet.
Conolly, L. A. 1979. ‘The rune 4 and the Germanic vowel system’. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 141:1–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coulmas, F. 2003. Writing systems. an introduction to their linguistic analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Derolez, R. 1981. ‘The runic system and its cultural context’. Michigan Germanic Studies 7 (Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Runes and Runic Inscriptions, ed. C. W. Thompson), 19–26.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1998. ‘The origin of runes: An alternative approach’. Academia analecta, Klasse der Letteren (Koninklijke Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsten van België) 601:1–35.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DR = L. Jacobsen and E. Moltke 1941–42. Danmarks runeindskrifter. København: Munksgaard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, S. 2005. Roman imperialism and runic literacy. the westernization of Northern europe (150–800 aD), Aun 33. Uppsala: Department of Archeology and Ancient History, Uppsala.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flowers, S. E. 1986. Runes and magic. Magic formulaic elements in the older runic tradition. New York/Berne/Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frankfurter, D. 1994. ‘The magic of writing and the writing of magic. The power of the word in Egyptian and Greek traditions’. Helios 211:189–211.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grønvik, O. 1996. Fra Vimose til Ødemotland. Nye studier over runeinnskrifter fra førkristen tid i Norden. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003. ‘Runeinnskriften fra Wremen i Nord-Tyskland’. Norsk lingvistisk tidsskrift 211:3–19.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Indrebø, G. 1951. Norsk Målsoga. Bergen: John Griegs Boktrykkeri.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krause, W., with H. Jankuhn. 1966. Die Runeninschriften im älteren Fuþark, Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen; Phil.-hist. Klasse; 3. Folge, Nr. 651. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Looijenga, T. 2003. Texts & contexts of the oldest runic inscriptions, The Northern world 4. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacLeod, M., and B. Mees. 2001. ‘The triple binds of Kragehul and Undley’. NOWELE 381:17–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Runic amulets and magic objects. Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, G. D. 1994. Ancient scripts and phonological knowledge, Current issues in linguistic theory 1161. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nielsen, H. F. 2000. The early Runic language of Scandinavia. Studies in Germanic dialect geography, Indogermanische Bibliothek. Erste Reihe. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parsons, D. N. 1999. Recasting the runes. the reform of the anglo-Saxon Futhorc, Runrön 141. Uppsala: Institutionen för nordiska språk, Uppsala universitet.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sampson, G. 1985. Writing systems. A linguistic introduction. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schön, M. D., K. Düwel, R. Heine, and E. Marold. 2006. ‘Die Inschrift auf dem Schemel von Wremen, Ldkr. Cuxhaven’. Germania 841:142–168.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schulte, M. 1998. Grundfragen der umlautphonemisierung. eine strukturelle analyse des nordgermanischen i/j-umlauts unter Berücksichtigung der älteren Runeninschriften, Ergänzungsbände zum Reallexikon der Germanischen Altertumskunde, 171. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2005. ‘Die lateinisch-altrunische Kontakthypothese im Lichte der sprachhistorischen Evidenz’. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und literatur 1271:161–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006a. ‘The transformation of the older fuþark: Number magic, runographic, or linguistic principles?’ Arkiv för nordisk filologi 1211:41–74.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006b. ‘Oral traces in runic epigraphy: Evidence from older and younger inscriptions’. Journal of Germanic linguistics 181:117–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. ‘Review of MacLeod and Mees 2006’. Journal of Germanic linguistics 191:73–83.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stoklund, M. 1996. ‘The Ribe cranium inscription and the Scandinavian transition to the younger reduced futhark’. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 451:199–209. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. ‘The runic inscription on the Ribe skull fragment’. In: M. Bencard, A. K. Rasmussen, and H. B. Madsen (eds.), Ribe excavations 1970–76, vol. 51. Højbjerg: Jutland Archaeological Society. Pp. 27–42.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Treiman, R. 1993. Beginning to spell. A study of first-grade children. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zimmermann, C. 2006. ‘Runeninschriften als Sprechakte? Vorüberlegungen zu einer pragmalinguistischen Untersuchung der Runeninschriften im älteren Futhark’. In: A. Bammesberger and G. Waxenberger (eds.), Das fuþark und seine einzelsprachlichen Weiterentwicklungen. akten der tagung in eichstätt vom 20. bis 24. Juli 2003. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter. Pp. 434–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Vogel, M., J. Alonso, K. Blaum, W. Quint, B. Schabinger, S. Sturm, J. Verdu, A. Wagner & G. Werth
2008. The anomalous magnetic moment of the electron in hydrogenlike ions. The European Physical Journal Special Topics 163:1 ► pp. 113 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue