The Origin and Development of Periphrastic Auxiliary do: A Case of Destigmatisation

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid

doi:10.1075/nowele.16.01ost

Article published In: NOWELE Volume 16 (September 1990)
[NOWELE 16] 1990
► pp. 3–52

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download PDF

The Origin and Development of Periphrastic Auxiliary do

A Case of Destigmatisation

Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade

Published online: 1 September 1990

https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.16.01ost

Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Order by:

Gotthard, Lisa

2024. Subject-verb agreement and the rise of do-support in the period of anglicisation of Scots. In Keys to the History of English [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 363], ► pp. 53 ff.

GOTTHARD, LISA

2025. The rise of Scots do – transfer or innovation?. English Language and Linguistics ► pp. 1 ff.

Ronan, Patricia

2014. Light verb constructions in the history  of English. In Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 63], ► pp. 15 ff.

McWHORTER, J. H.

2009. What else happened to English? A brief for the Celtic hypothesis. English Language and Linguistics 13:2 ► pp. 163 ff.

Denison, David

2003. Log(ist)ic and simplistic S-curves. In Motives for Language Change, ► pp. 54 ff.

Roger Lass

2000. The Cambridge History of the English Language,

BÆKKEN, BJØRG

1999. PERIPHRASTIC DOIN EARLY MODERN ENGLISH. Folia Linguistica Historica 33:Historica vol. 20,1-2

Garrett, Andrew

1998. On the origin of auxiliarydo. English Language and Linguistics 2:2 ► pp. 283 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.