The rise and fall and rise of the digraph 〈oa〉 in English
Published online: 12 December 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.00077.ste
https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.00077.ste
Abstract
The present paper examines the history of the digraph 〈oa〉 in English: it is relatively rare in OE and early ME, falls out of use in late ME, and reappears in the late fifteenth century. Different lexemes have been spelt with 〈oa〉 in the different language periods, but in the majority of cases, the vowel so represented is the reflex of early ME /ɔ:/ or OE o in an open syllable; hence, the digraph is clearly phonetically conditioned. The paper also investigates the graphotactic constraints on the orthographic variants 〈oa〉, 〈oCe〉, 〈oe〉.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.StE words with 〈oa〉: Etymology
- 3.The history of 〈oa〉
- 3.1Middle English uses of 〈oa〉
- 3.2Early Modern English uses of 〈oa〉
- A corpus of Middle English local documents (MELD)
- The Paston Letters
- Early English books online (EEBO)
- The Malaga Corpus of Early Modern English scientific prose
- 3.3Fifteenth-century professional scribes, early printers and spelling reformers
- 4.The distribution of 〈oaC〉 vs. 〈oCe〉 vs. 〈oe〉
- 5.Summary and conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (52)
Beadle, R. & C. Richmond (eds.). 2005. The Paston letters and papers of the fifteenth century: part III. EETS SS 22. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Benskin, M. 2004. Chancery Standard. In C. Kay, C. Hough & I. Wotherspoon (eds.), New perspectives on English historical linguistics. Selected papers from 12 ICEHL, Glasgow, 21–26 August 2002. Volume II: Lexis and transmission, 1–40. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Benskin, M., M. Laing, V. Karaiskos & K. Williamson. 2013. An electronic version of A linguistic atlas of late Mediaeval English. University of Edinburgh. [URL]
Carignan, C. 2018. An examination of oral articulation of vowel nasality in the light of the independent effects of nasalization on vowel quality. In A. Vietti, L. Spreafico, D. Mereu & V. Galatà (eds.), Studi AISV IV: Speech in the natural context, 19–40. Milan: Associazione Italiana Scienze della Voce.
Coote, E. 1596. The English schoole-maister. London: Widow Orwin, for Ralph Jackson and Robert Dextar.
Crotch, W. J. B. 1928. The prologues and epilogues of William Caxton. EETS OS 176. London: Oxford University Press.
Davis, N. 1963. The Paston letters: A selection in modern spelling. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2004. The Paston letters and papers of the fifteenth century: parts I and II. EETS SS 20–21. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Early English Books Online (EEBO): [URL] [Accessed 27 January 2020]
García, A. M., J. C. Martín, D. M. Olalla, S. G. F. Corugedo, G. D. Caie. 2007–16. The Malaga corpus of early Modern English scientific prose. University of Málaga. [URL] [Accessed 25 January 2020]
Healey, A. D., J. P. Wilkin & Xin Xiang. 2009. Dictionary of Old English web corpus. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project. [URL] [Accessed on 20 January 2020]
Huloet, R. & J. Higgins. 1572. Huloets dictionarie newelye corrected, amended, set in order and enlarged […] London: Thomas Marsh.
Laing, M. 2013. A linguistic atlas of early Middle English. University of Edinburgh. [URL] [Accessed 22 January 2020]
Liebl, C. 2006. The A and O of a medieval English sound-change: Prolegomena to a study of the origins and early geographical diffusion of /ɑ:/ > /ɔ:/. In N. Ritt et al. (eds.), Medieval English and its heritage. Structure, meaning and mechanisms of change, 19–35. Frankfurt: Lang.
McIntosh, A., M. Samuels & M. Benskin. 1986. A linguistic atlas of late mediaeval English, Vols. I–IV. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.
OED = The Oxford English Dictionary Online: [URL]
The project Gutenberg ebook of the Paston letters. Vols. I–VI1, edited by James Gairdner. [URL] [Accessed 28 January 2020]
Rutkowska, H. 2016. Orthographic regularization in early Modern English printed books: grapheme distribution and vowel length indication. In C. Russi (ed.), Current trends in historical sociolinguistics, 165–193. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Salmon, V. 1989. John Rastell and the normalization of early sixteenth-century orthography. In L. E. Breivik, A. Hille & S. Johansson (eds.), Essays on English language in honour of Bertil Sundby, 289–301. Oslo: Novus.
1999. Orthography and punctuation. In R. Lass et al. (eds.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. 3: 1476–1776, 13–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1972. Linguistic evolution, with special reference to English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stenbrenden, G. F. 2016. Long-vowel shifts in English, c. 1050–1700: Evidence from spelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2020. Coda approximants in British English: A diachronic and synchronic account. In R. P. Lorido, C. Prado-Alonso & P. Rodriguez-Puente (eds.), Of ye Olde Englisch langage and textes: New perspectives on Old and Middle English language and literature, 109–137. Berlin: Lang.
Stenroos, M., M. Mäkinen, S. Horobin & J. Smith. 2011. The Middle English grammar corpus, version 2011.1. University of Stavanger. URL: [URL] [Accessed 28 January 2020]
Stenroos, M., K. V. Thengs & G. Bergstrøm. 2017. A corpus of Middle English local documents. University of Stavanger. [URL] [Accessed 19 January 2020]
