Cover not available

Article published In: NOWELE
Vol. 75:2 (2022) ► pp.223–256

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

The nature of graphs and graphemes in Middle Dutch writing and the problem of parsing

ORCiD logo with link | Universität Zürich | Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Published online: 22 November 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.00069.wul
Abstract
This article focuses on the practical problems that go along with the sequencing of older non-standardised spelling forms into consonant and vowel graphemes. The issue of segmental parsing is important in research on the development of Dutch spelling, mostly drawing from thirteenth and fourteenth century charter spellings. The research aims are introduced in part 1, and then the problems of defining graphs and then syllables are discussed in part 2. These problems stem from the theoretical graphemic level, but have a very direct impact on the practical level, as they hinder the automatic parsing of tokens in the corpus, as discussed in part 3. The goal of this article is to provide partial solutions in parsing of non-standardised language data for graphemic research.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Development of Dutch Orthography
    • 1.2Scope of the project
    • 1.3Problems
  • 2.Theoretical outset
    • 2.1Terminology
      • 2.1.1Grapheme vs. graph
      • 2.1.2Graph base vs. graph extension
      • 2.1.3Syllable opposition
    • 2.2Segmentation of graphs/graphemes
  • 3.Finding graphs in the Middle Dutch text corpus
    • 3.1Letter-based graph parsing
    • 3.2Syllable-based graph parsing
    • 3.3Lemma-based graph parsing
  • 4.Summary and outlook
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (70)
References
Bach, H. 1937–1943: Die thüringisch-sächsische Kanzleisprache bis 1325. Bd. I: Vokalismus. Bd. II: Druckschwache Silben. Konsonantismus. Formenlehre. Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard/E. Munksgaard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beaulieux, C. 1967. Histoire de l’orthographe française. Nouveau tirage. Tome Premier: formation de l’orthographe des origins au milieu du XVIe siècle. Tome second: les accents et autres signes auxiliaires. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benders, J. F. 2002. Bestuursstructuur en schrijfcultuur. Een analyse van de bestuurlijke verschriftelijking in Deventer tot het eind van de 15de eeuw. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen, Groningen. [URL] (26 April, 2022).
Benskin, M. 1997. Texts from a township in late medieval Ireland. Collegium Medievale 101. 91–173.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001. The language of the English texts. In T. Hunt (ed.), Three receptaria from Medieval England, 193–230. Oxford: Society for the Study of Medieval Languages and Literature.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benskin, M. & M. Laing. 2013–. An electronic version of a Linguistic Atlas of Late Mediaeval English with webscripts by V. Karaiskos & K. Williamson. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh. [URL] (29 July, 2022).
Berteloot, A. 1984. Bijdrage tot een klankatlas van het dertiende-eeuwse Middelnederlands. 21 Parts. Gent: Leonard-Willems-Halettfonds.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boesch, B. 1946. Untersuchungen zur alemannischen Urkundensprache des 15. Jahrhunderts. Laut- und Formenlehre. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bouma, G. & B. J. H. Hermans. 2012. Syllabification in Middle Dutch. In F. Mambrini, M. Passarotti & C. Sporleder (eds.), Proceedings of the second workshop on annotation of corpora for research in the humanities (ACRH-2), 27–38. Lisbon: Edições Colibri.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Catach, N. 2001/2008. Histoire de l’orthographe française. Édition posthume, réalisée par Renée Honvault avec la collaboration de Irène Rosier-Catach. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Condorelli, M. 2020. From the early modern era to an international research area. In M. Condorelli (ed.), Advances in historical orthography, c. 1500–1800, 1–15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
CPWNL = Corpus Materiaal Pieter Willems. 1880–. Compiled by P. Willems. [URL] (22 November, 2021).
CGR13 = Corpus of 13th century Dutch charters. 1977–. Compiled by M. Gysseling, W. J. J. Pijnenburg & P. van Reenen. [URL] (25 June, 2021–29 July, 2022).
CRM14 = Corpus of 14th century Dutch charters. 1993–. Compiled by P. van Reenen & M. Mulder. [URL] (25 June, 2021–29 July, 2022).
De Wulf, C. 2014. Van af naar van. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 711. 149–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2018. Een veertiende-eeuwse oorkonde uit Saaftinge of Kortrijk. In T. Colleman, J. De Caluwe, V. De Tier, A.-S. Ghyselen, L. Triest, R. Vandenberghe & U. Vogl. (eds.), Woorden om te bewaren. Huldeboek voor Jacques Van Keymeulen, 387–406. Gent: Skribis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2019. Klankatlas van het veertiende-eeuwse Middelnederlands. Het dialectvocalisme in de spelling van lokale oorkonden. Gent: Koninklijke Academie voor Nederlandse Taal en Letteren. With online supplements at [URL] (26 April–29 July, 2022).
2021. Spellingonderzoek in ontwikkeling. Taal & Tongval 731. 111–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Wulf, C. & K. Bischof. 2021. Der Bochouter Schöffenbrief (1249). Im Vergleich mit den privatrechtlichen Urkundendatenbanken in der niederländischen historischen Sprachwissenschaft. In S. Höffler & K. Müller (eds.), Rechtsetzung als Textkonstitution. Sprachwissenschaftliche Zugänge zu modernen und historischen Rechtsquellen, 211–242. Zürich/St.Gallen: Dike Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Wulf, C., J. Goossens, J. Taeldeman & G. Verleyen. 1998–2005. Fonologische Atlas van de Nederlandse Dialecten (FAND). Part I–IV1. Gent: Koninklijke Academie voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dürscheid, C. 2016. Einführung in die Schriftlinguistik. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elmentaler, M. 2003. Struktur und Wandel vormoderner Schreibsprachen. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2018. Historische Graphematik des Deutschen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
FAND = C. De Wulf et al. 1998–2005.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fleischer, W. 1969. Die Entwicklung des neuhochdeutschen Graphemsystems. In E. Agricola, W. Fleischer & H. Protze (eds.), Kleine Enzyklopädie. Die deutsche Sprache. Erster Band, 228–234. Leipzig: VEB Bibliographisches Institut.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuhrhop, N. & J. Peters. 2013. Einführung in die Phonologie und Graphematik. Stuttgart: Metzler. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallmann, P. 1985. Graphische Elemente der geschriebenen Sprache. Grundlagen für eine Reform der Orthographie. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glaser, E. 1985. Graphische Studien zum Schreibsprachwandel vom 13. bis 16. Jahrhundert. Vergleich verschiedener Handschriften des Augsburger Stadtbuches. Heidelberg: Winter Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greule, A., J. Meier & A. Ziegler (eds.). 2012. Kanzleisprachenforschung. Ein internationales Handbuch. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haverals, W., F. Karsdorp & M. Kestemont. 2019. Data-driven syllabification for Middle Dutch. Digital Medievalist 12(1). 1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoebeke, M. 1968. De Middeleeuwse oorkondentaal te Oudenaarde: 13e eeuw–± 1500 (spelling en klankleer). Gent: Secretariaat van de Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie voor Taal- en Letterkunde.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kettmann, G. 1967. Die kursächsische Kanzleisprache zwischen 1486 und 1546. Studien zum Aufbau und zur Entwicklung. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laing, M. 2013–. A Linguistic Atlas of Early Middle English, 1150–1325 (LAEME), Version 3.2 (With R. Lass (Introduction) and webscripts by K. Willamson, V. Karaiskos & S. Branchaw.) Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh. [URL] (29 July, 2022).
Laing, M. & R. Lass. 2003. Tales of the 1001 nists: the phonological implications of litteral substitution sets in some thirteenth-century South-West Midlands texts. English Language and Linguistics 7(2). 257–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laing, M., R. Lass. 2006. Early Middle English dialectology: Problems and prospects. In A. van Kemenade & B. Los (eds.), The handbook of the history of English, 417–451. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
LALME = A. McIntosh et al. 1986.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larsen, N.-E. 2001. Grafematische analyse van een Middelnederlandse tekst. Het grafeemsysteem van de Vroegmiddelnederlandse statuten van de Gentse leprozerie uit 1236. Amsterdam: Rozenberg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lass, R. & M. Laing. 2013. The early Middle English reflexes of Germanic *ik ‘I’: Unpacking the changes. Folia Linguistica Historica 341. 93–113.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maas, U. 1997. Orthographische Regularitäten, Regeln und ihre Deregulierung. Am Beispiel der Dehnungszeichen im Deutschen. In G. Augst, K. Blüml, D. Nerius & H. Sitta (eds.), Zur Neuregelung der deutschen Orthographie. Begründung und Kritik, 337–364. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marynissen, A., D. Bock & A. Terhalle. 2021. Op weg naar een geschreven eenheidstaal: de ontdialectisering van de schrijftaal bij Gheraert Leeu, drukker in Gouda en Antwerpen. Taal & Tongval 731. 245–295. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marynissen, A. & T. A. J. M. Janssen. 2014. Vroegnieuwnederlands voor commercie en cultuur. In F. Van de Velde, H. Smessaert, F. Van Eynde & S. Verbrugge (eds.), Patroon en argument. Een dubbelfeestbundel bij het emeritaat van William Van Belle en Joop van der Horst, 500–512. Leuven: Universitaire Pers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McIntosh, A., M. L. Samuels & M. Benskin (eds.). 1986. A Linguistic Atlas of Late Mediaeval English (LALME) (41 vols.). Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meijering, H. 1974. De willekeuren van de Opstalsboom (1323). Een filologisch-historische monografie. Groningen: V.R.B. Offsetdrukkerij.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meletis, D. 2015. Graphetik. Form und Materialität von Schrift. Glückstadt: Verlag Werner Hülsbusch.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meletis, D. & C. Dürscheid. 2022. Writing systems and their use. An overview of grapholinguistics. (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 369). Berlin: De Gruyter. (5 August, 2022).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Middelnederlands.nl = CGR13 + CRM14. [URL] (25 June, 2021–29 July, 2022).
Mooijaart, M. A. 1992. Atlas van Vroegmiddelnederlandse taalvarianten. Utrecht: LEd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moser, H. 1977. Die Kanzlei Kaiser Maximilians I. Graphematik eines Schreibusus. Teil I: Untersuchungen. Teil II: Texte. Innsbruck: Institut für Deutsche Philologie der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1987. Geredete Graphie. Zur Entstehung orthoepischer Normvorstellungen im Frühneuhochdeutschen. Zeitschrift für deutsche Philologie 1061. 379–399.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moser, V. 1929. Frühneuhochdeutsche Grammatik / 1,1 1, Lautlehre; 1: Orthographie, Betonung, Stammsilbenvokale. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neef, M. 2005. Die Graphematik des Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neef, M. & B. Primus. 2001. Stumme Zeugen der Autonomie. Eine Replik auf Ossner. Linguistische Berichte 1871. 353–378.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nunn, A. M. 1998. Dutch orthography; A systematic investigation of the spelling of Dutch words. Den Haag: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paradis, C. & J.-F. Prunet. 2000. Nasal vowels as two segments: Evidence from borrowings. Language 761. 324–357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peersman, C. 2007. De opkomst van de volkstalen in de oorkonden van de abdij van Ninove. Casestudy van een bewogen eeuw (1250–1350). Handelingen van de Koninklijke Zuid-Nederlandse Maatschappij voor Taal- en Letterkunde en Geschiedenis LXI1 2007 (appeared 2008). 129–145.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pijnenburg, W. J. J. 1997. Vroegmiddelnederlands (circa 1200–1350). In M. C. van den Toorn, W. J. J. Pijnenburg, J. A. van Leuvensteijn & J. M. van der Horst (eds.), Geschiedenis van de Nederlandse taal, 69–145. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pleij, H. 2010. Printing as a long-term revolution. In H. Wijsman (ed.), Books in transition at the time of Philip the Fair: Manuscripts and printed books in the late fifteenth and early sixteenth century Low Countries, 297–307. Turnhout: Brepols. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pletinckx, L. 2003. Woordenboek van het Asses: bijdrage tot de studie van de West-Brabants dialect. Asse: Koninklijke heemkring Ascania.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rem, M. 2003. De taal van de klerken uit de Hollandse grafelijke kanselarij (1300–1340). Naar een lokaliseringsprocedure voor het veertiende-eeuwse Middelnederlands. Amsterdam: Stichting Neerlandistiek VU.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmitt, L. E. 1936. Die deutsche Urkundensprache in der Kanzlei Kaiser Karls IV. (1346–1378). Halle/Salle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smessaert, H. & W. Decoster. 2019. Basisbegrippen fonetiek en fonologie. 4th edn. Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Bree, C. 2016. Leerboek voor de historische grammatica van het Nederlands. Deel 1: Gotisch grammatica, inleiding, klankleer. 2nd edn. [URL] (26 April, 2022).
Vandenbussche, W. 2007. Shared standardization factors in the history of sixteen Germanic languages. In C. Fandrych & R. Salverda (eds.), Standard, Variation und Sprachwandel in germanischen Sprachen, 25–36. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Reenen, P. Th. & M. Mulder. 1993. Een gegevensbank van 14de-eeuwse Middelnederlandse dialecten op computer. Lexikos 31. 259–279.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Loey, A. 1949. Middelnederlandse spraakkunst. 2. Klankleer. Groningen: Wolters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Loon, J. 2014. Historische fonologie van het Nederlands. Antwerpen: Universitas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Voeste, A. 2008. Orthographie und Innovation. Die Segmentierung des Wortes im 16. Jahrhundert. Hildesheim/New York: Olms.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolf, N. 1975. Regionale und überregionale Norm im späten Mittelalter. Graphematische und lexikalische Untersuchungen zu deutschen und niederländischen Schriftdialekten. Innsbruck: Inst. für dt. Philologie der Univ.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue