Incipient articles in Old East Scandinavian varieties
Published online: 22 November 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.00067.san
https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.00067.san
Abstract
This is a study of the semantics of definiteness marking and of its applicability to the Old East Scandinavian
linguistic scenario. Contrary to the Modern Continental Scandinavian languages, Old East Scandinavian varieties did not possess
fully-fledged definite articles, although all three demonstrative systems (hinn, -inn, sá/þænn, and
sjá/þænni) show some evidence of being used as markers of definiteness. A semantic analysis of these forms in
extracts from the Scanian Law and Guta Lag reveals the differentiated intermediate stages along
the cline of grammaticalisation these definiteness markers found themselves in during this linguistic period. This confirms, in
turn, that despite not being employed as definite articles proper, hinn, -inn and sá/þænn show
some degree of semantic bleaching.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The Old Scandinavian tripartite demonstrative system
- 2.1Introduction
- 2.2The incipient article hinn and enclitic -inn
- 2.3The simple distal demonstrative sá/þænn
- 2.4The compound proximal demonstrative sjá/þænni
- 3.Demonstratives versus definite articles
- 3.1Introduction
- 3.2Stage I: Situationally evoked deixis
- 3.3Stage II: Direct anaphoric reference
- 3.4Stage III: Indirect anaphoric reference
- 3.5Stage IV: Unique reference
- 3.6Stage V: Generic reference
- 3.7Diagnostics
- 3.8Revisiting hinn and enclitic -inn
- 4.Incipient articles in Äldre Västgötalagen
- 4.1Introduction
- 4.2The text
- 4.3Enclitic -inn in Äldre Västgötalagen
- 4.4The distal demonstrative sá/þænn in Äldre Västgötalagen
- 4.5Conclusion
- 5.Incipient articles in the Scanian Law and the Guta Lag
- 5.1Introduction
- 5.2The incipient article hinn
- 5.3Enclitic -inn
- 5.4The distal demonstrative sá/þænn
- 5.5The compound proximal demonstrative sjá/þænni
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (68)
Andersen, H. 2006. Grammation,
regrammation, and degrammation: Tense loss in
Russian. Diachronica 23(2). 231–258.
Becher, V. 2010. Differences
in the use of deictic expressions in English and German
texts. Linguistics 48(4). 1309–1342.
Börjars, K. & J. Payne. 2016. Adjectival
definiteness marking and noun-phrase internal functions. University of Manchester, HEADLEX, 25 July
2016.
Braunmüller, K. 2002. The
Ancient Nordic linguistic system from a typological point of view: Phonology, graphemics, morphology, syntax, and word
order. In O. Bandle, K. Braunmüller, E. H. Jahr, A. Karker, H. Naumann, & U. Teleman (eds.), The
Nordic languages: An international handbook of the history of the North Germanic
Languages, vol. 11, 649–656. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Breban, T. 2012. Functional
shifts and the development of English determiners. In A. Meurman–Solin, M. J. López–Couso & B. Los (eds.), Information
structure and syntactic change in the history of
English, 271–300. New York: Oxford University Press.
Carlquist, J. 2002. The
history of Old Nordic manuscripts III: Old Swedish. In O. Bandle, K. Braunmüller, E. H. Jahr, A. Karker, H. Naumann, & U. Teleman (eds.), The
Nordic languages: An international handbook of the history of the North Germanic
Languages, vol. 11, 808–816. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Crisma, P. 2011. The
emergence of the definite article in English: A contact–induced
change? In P. Sleeman & H. Perridon (eds.), The
Noun Phrase in Romance and Germanic: Structure, variation, and
change, 175–192. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
2015. The
‘indefinite article’ from cardinal to operator to expletive. In Ch. Gianollo, A. Jäger, & D. Penka (eds.), Language
change at the syntax–semantics
interface, 125–151. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Crisma, P. & S. Pintzuk. 2016. An
from Old to Middle English. In S. Vikner, H. Jørgensen & E. van Gelderen (eds.), Let
us have articles betwixt Us: Papers in historical and comparative linguistics in honour of Johanna L.
Wood, 161–183. Aarhus: Aarhus University.
Dahl, Ö. 2015. Grammaticalization
in the north: Noun Phrase morphosyntax in Scandinavian
vernaculars. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Delsing, L. 2002. The
morphology of Old Nordic II: Old Swedish and Old Danish. In O. Bandle, K. Braunmüller, E. H. Jahr, A. Karker, H. Naumann, & U. Teleman (eds.), The
Nordic languages: An international handbook of the history of the North Germanic
Languages, vol. 11, 925–939. Berlin: De Gruyter.
(ed.). 2017. Fornsvenska
Textbanken. Lund: Lund University. [URL]
De Mulder, W. & A. Cartier. 2011. The
grammaticalization of definite articles. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (eds.), The
Oxford handbook of
grammaticalization, 522–535. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Diessel, H. 1999. Demonstratives:
Form, function, and
grammaticalization. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Faarlund, J. T. 2004. The
syntax of Old Norse: With a survey of the inflectional morphology and a complete
bibliography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fertig, D. 2013. Analogy
and morphological change (Edinburgh Historical Linguistics
1). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Fraurud, K. 2000. Possessives
with extensive use: A source of definite articles? In I. Baron, M. Herslund & F. Sørensen (eds.), Dimensions
of
possession, 72–97. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Frederiksen, B. O. 2002. The
history of Old Nordic manuscripts IV: Old Danish. In O. Bandle, K. Braunmüller, E. H. Jahr, A. Karker, H. Naumann, & U. Teleman (eds.), The
Nordic languages: An international handbook of the history of the North Germanic
Languages, vol. 11, 816–824. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Gundel, J. K., N. Hedberg, & R. Zacharski. 1993. Cognitive
status and the form of referring expressions in
discourse. Language 691. 274–307.
Haugen, E. 1976. The
Scandinavian languages: An introduction to their
history. London: Faber and Faber.
Hawkins, J. 1978. Definiteness
and indefiniteness: A study in reference and grammaticality
prediction. London: Croom Helm.
Hawkins, J. A. 2009. Germanic
languages. In B. Comrie (ed.), The
world’s major languages, 2nd
edn, 51–58. London: Routledge.
Heine, B. & T. Kuteva. 2009. World
lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heltoft, L. 2001. Reanalysing
structure: The Danish definite article, its predecessors, and development. Acta Linguistica
Hafniensia 33(1). 67–90.
Himmelmann, H. P. 1997. Deiktikon,
Artikel, Nominalphrase: Zur Emergenz syntaktischer
Struktur. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Huddleston, R. & G. K. Pullum. 2002. The
Cambridge grammar of the English
language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kuryłowicz, J. 1965
[1975]. The evolution of grammatical categories. Diogenes
51. Esquisses linguistiques, vol.
2, 38–54. Munich: Fink.
Lander, E. T. & L. Haegeman. 2014. Old
Norse as an NP language: With observations on the Common Norse and Northwest Germanic runic
inscriptions. Transactions of the Philological
Society 112(3). 279–318.
Lehmann, C. 1982. Thoughts
on grammaticalization: A programmatic
sketch. Cologne: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.
Millar, R. M. 2000. System
collapse, system rebirth: The demonstrative pronouns of English 900–1350 and the birth of the definite
article. Bern: Peter Lang.
Neckel, G. 1924. Die
Entwicklung von schwachtonigem Altnordischem u (o) vor m aus helleren Vokalen und der altnordische Substantivartikel:
Festschrift für E. Mogk. Haale an der Saale: Niemeyer.
Peel, C. (ed.). 2015. Guta
Lag and Guta Saga: The law and history of the
Gotlanders. London: Routledge.
Perridon, H. C. B. 1989. Reference,
definiteness, and the noun phrase in Swedish. PhD
Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Perridon, H. C. B. & P. Sleeman. 2011. The
noun phrase in Germanic and Romance: Common developments and
differences. In P. Sleeman & H. C. B. Perridon (eds.), The
noun phrase in Romance and Germanic: Structure, variation, and
change, 1–21. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Peterson, P. 2018. An
annotated edition and translation of The Older Law of Västergötland. The Heroic
Age 181. [URL]
Pfaff, A. 2019. Reunited
after 1000 years: The development of definite articles in Icelandic. Nordic Journal of
Linguistics 421. 165–207.
Pfaff, A. & G. Walkden. Forthcoming. Adjectival
articles in early Germanic. In K. Bech & A. Pfaff (eds.), Diversity
in the Old Germanic noun phrase. Open Germanic
Linguistics. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Philippi, J. 1997. The
rise of the article in the Germanic languages. In A. van Kemenade & N. Vincent (eds.), Parameters
of morphosyntactic
change, 62–93. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pollack, H. W. 1912. Zur
Stellung des Attributes im Urgermanischen: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des suffigierten Artikel im Altnordischen und der
germanischen Kasuskomposita. Indogermanische
Forschungen 301. 283–302.
Prince, E. F. 1981. Toward
a taxonomy of given–new information. In P. Cole (ed.), Radical
pragmatics, 223–255. New York: Academic Press.
Ratkus, A. 2018. Weak
adjectives need not be definite: The evidence of variation in Gothic. Indogermanische
Forschungen 123(1). 27–64.
Ringe. 2006. From Proto-Indo-European to
Proto-Germanic. A linguistic history of
English, vol. 11. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roehrs, D. & C. D. Sapp. 2004. The
rise of the suffixal article in the Early North Germanic DP. In M. T. Martinez, A. Alcázar, and M. T. Hernández (eds.), Proceedings
of the thirty-third Western Conference on
Linguistic, vol. 161, 290–301. Fresno: California State University.
Skrzypek, D. 2009a. Äldre
and Yngre Västgötalagen–– Some linguistic evidence. Folia
Scandinavica 101. 205–218.
2009b. The
formation of the definite article in the Nordic languages. Lingua
Posnaniensis 511. 65–76.
2010. Between
a demonstrative and an article: The status of in in Old Swedish. Folia
Scandinavica 111. 145–162.
2020. Indirect
anaphora in a diachronic perspective: The case of Danish and
Swedish. In K. Balogh, A. Latrouite & R. Van Valin Jr. (eds.), Nominal
anchoring: Specificity, definiteness, and article systems across
languages, 171–193. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Skrzypek, D., A. Piotrowska, & R. Jaworski. 2021. The
diachrony of definiteness in North
Germanic. Leiden: Brill.
Sommerer, L. 2018. Article
emergence in Old English: A constructionalist
perspective. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Stroh-Wollin, U. 2009. On
the development of definiteness markers in Scandinavian. Working Papers in Scandinavian
Syntax 831. 1–25.
2020. Hinn and hinn: Early Icelandic as the clue to the history and etymology of two Old Scandinavian
words. Nordic Journal of
Linguistics 431. 205–228.
Syrett, M. 2002. Morphological
developments from Ancient Nordic to Old Nordic. In O. Bandle, K. Braunmüller, E. H. Jahr, A. Karker, H. Naumann, & U. Teleman (eds.), The
Nordic languages: An international handbook of the history of the North Germanic
languages, vol. 11, 719–729. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Tamm, D. & H. Vogt. (eds.). 2016. The
Danish medieval laws: The laws of Scania, Zealand, and
Jutland. London: Routledge.
Traugott, E. 1980. Meaning-change
in the development of grammatical markers. Language
Sciences 2(1). 44–61.
Vrieland, S. D. 2011. Old
Gutnish historical phonology and the Old Norse context. Master’s
Thesis, University of Leiden.
