Cover not available

Article published In: Historical Germanic morphosyntax
Edited by Stephen Laker and John Ole Askedal
[NOWELE 74:2] 2021
► pp. 172–198

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

Verb-final conjunct clauses in Old English prose

The role of Latin in translated texts

ORCiD logo with link | University of Lodz
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 18 November 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.00056.cic
Abstract
The aim of this study is to analyse intertextual differences in the use of V-final order in Old English conjunct clauses and to determine to what extent the source of these differences may be Latin influence. The analysis reveals that the frequency of V-final order in OE conjuncts is rather limited in most texts, and Bede’s Historia Ecclesiastica surfaces as the text in which the frequency of V-final conjunct clauses is exceptionally high. The study shows that the regular use of V-final order in Bede may be interpreted as a translation effect, with Latin inflating the frequency of the pattern in conjunct clauses, which means that the frequency of V-final conjunct clauses in early OE translations may not reflect native tendencies.
Article outline
  • 1.Conjunct clauses and the verb-final order
  • 2.Methodology
  • 3.Intertextual differences
  • 4.Bede and translation effects
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (31)
References
Baker, P. 2012. Introduction to Old English. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bately, J. M. 1988. Old English prose before and during the reign of Alfred. Anglo-Saxon England 171. 93–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bech, K. 2001. Word order patterns in Old and Middle English: A syntactic and pragmatic study. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation: University of Bergen.
2017. Old truths, new corpora: Revisiting the word order of conjunct clauses in Old English. English Language and Linguistics 21(1). 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, W. H. 1969. Method and style in the Old English “Pastoral Care”. The Journal of English and Germanic Philology 68(4). 666–684.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cichosz, A. 2017. Verb-initial main clauses in Bede: A translation effect? In A. Kijak, J. Nykiel & A. M. Łęcki (eds.), Current developments in English historical linguistics, 68–89. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Devine, A. M. & L. D. Stephens. 2006. Latin word order. Structured meaning and information. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, O., A. van Kemenade, W. Koopman & W. van der Wurff. 2000. The syntax of early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuß, E. & C. Trips. 2002. Variation and change in Old and Middle English: On the validity of the Double Base Hypothesis. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 41. 171–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haeberli, E. 2002. Observations on the loss of verb second in the history of English. In C. J. W. Zwart & W. Abraham (eds.), Studies in comparative Germanic syntax, 245–272. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haeberli, E. & S. Pintzuk. 2012. Revisiting verb (projection) raising in Old English. In D. Jonas, J. Whitman & A. Garret (eds.), Grammatical change: Origins, nature, outcomes, 219–238. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kemenade, A. van. 1987. Syntactic case and morphological case in the history of English. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koopman, W. 1995. Verb-final main clauses in Old English prose. Studia Neophilologica 67(2). 129–144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lemke, A. 2015. The Old English translation of Bede’s Historia Ecclesiastica Gentis Anglorum in its historical and cultural context. Göttingen: Georg-August-University. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. 1985. Old English syntax. Oxford: Clarendon. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ohkado, M. 2000. Verb first constructions in Old English, with special reference to Bede’s Ecclesiastical history of the English people, 263–278. In M. Amano & H. Nakano (eds.), Synchronic and diachronic studies on language: A festschrift for Dr. Hirozo Nakano. Nagoya: Nagoya University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pintzuk, S. 1996. Old English verb-complement word order and the change from OV to VO. York Papers in Linguistics 171. 241–264.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999. Phrase structures in competition: Variation and change in Old English word order. New York: Garland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2005. Arguments against a universal base: evidence from Old English. English Language and Linguistics 9(1). 115–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pintzuk, S. & E. Haeberli. 2008. Structural variation in Old English root clauses. Language Variation and Change 20(3). 367–407. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plummer, Ch. (ed.). 1896. Venerabilis Beadae, Historiam Ecclesiasticam Gentis Anglorum. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (available online at [URL])
Randall, B., A. Kroch & A. Taylor. 2005–2013. CorpusSearch 2. (available online at [URL]).
Ringe, D. & A. Taylor. 2015. The development of Old English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rowley, S. 2015. The long ninth century and the prose of King Alfred’s reign. Oxford Handbooks Online. (Retrieved 9 Apr. 2020, from [URL])
Taylor, A. 2008. Contact effects of translation: distinguishing two kinds of influence in Old English. Language Variation and Change 20(3). 341–365. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, A., A. Warner, S. Pintzuk & F. Beths. 2003. The York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose (YCOE). Department of Linguistics, University of York. Oxford Text Archive. (available online at [URL])
Traugott, E. C. 1972. A history of English syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. 1992. Syntax. In R. M. Hogg (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 1: The beginnings to 1066, 168–289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wallis, C. 2013. The Old English Bede: Transmission and textual history in Anglo-Saxon manuscripts. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation: University of Sheffield.
Zimmermann, R. 2017. Formal and quantitative approaches to the study of syntactic change: Three case studies from the history of English. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation: University of Geneva.
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

CICHOSZ, ANNA
2024. The syntactic status of V-final conjunct clauses in Old English: the role of priming. English Language and Linguistics 28:2 ► pp. 247 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue