Cover not available

Article published In: Early history of the North Sea Germanic languages
Edited by Stephen Laker and Hans Frede Nielsen †
[NOWELE 74:1] 2021
► pp. 66–79

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Deciphering the inscription of the Undley bracteate under the possibilities/restrictions of the Pre-Old English sound system

 | University of Southern Denmark
Published online: 19 April 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.00049.nie
Abstract
This paper was first read at a runic event held in Eichstätt in 2012 and was subsequently, in a revised and extended form, presented at the symposium on the Early History of the North-Sea Germanic Languages that took place in Odense on 13 March 2018. The paper is highly relevant to the theme of the Odense conference as well as to this special issue of NOWELE in that it deals with the runes and the language of the Undley bracteate, a stray runic find from the late fifth century discovered at Undley in Suffolk in the south-east of England. My presentation will focus on the vocalism of the Undley legend. But the linguistic perspective will be widened considerably, and I shall discuss and criticize in detail some of the major proposals for reading and interpreting this inscription within a North-Sea Germanic and Pre-Old English context.
References (51)
References
Bammesberger, A. 1991. Ingvaeonic sound changes and the Anglo-Frisian runes. In A. Bammesberger (ed.), Old English runes and their Continental background, 389–408. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1994. The development of the runic script and its relationship to Germanic phonological history. In T. Swan, E. Mørck & O. Jansen Westvik (eds.), Language change and language structure: Older Germanic languages in a comparative perspective, 1–25. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006. Das futhark und seine Weiterentwicklung in der anglo-friesischen Überlieferung. In A. Bammesberger & G. Waxenberger (eds.), Das fuþark und seine einzelsprachlichen Weiterentwicklungen, 171–187. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Braune, W. 2004. Althochdeutsche Grammatik I: Laut- und Formenlehre. 151. Auflage bearbeitet von I. Reiffenstein. Tübingen: Niemeyer. [Cited in the text as Braune/Reiffenstein] Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campbell, A. 1959. Old English grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Derolez, R. 1990. Runic literacy among the Anglo-Saxons. In A. Bammesberger & A. Wollmann (eds.), Britain 400–600: Language and history, 397–436. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Düwel, K. & S. Nowak. 2011. Die semantisch lesbaren Inschriften auf Goldbrakteaten. In W. Heizmann & M. Axboe (eds.), Die Goldbrakteaten der Völkerwanderungszeit – Auswertung und Neufunde, 375–473. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eichner, H. 1990. Die Ausprägung der linguistischen Physiognomie des Englischen anno 400 bis 600 n. Chr. In A. Bammesberger & A. Wollmann (eds.), Britain 400–600: Language and history, 307–333. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grønvik, O. 1996. Fra Vimose til Ødemotland. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hills, C. 1991a. The archaeological context of runic finds. In A. Bammesberger (ed.), Old English runes and their continental background, 41–59. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1991b. The gold bracteate from Undley, Suffolk: Some further thoughts. Studien zur Sachsenforschung 71. 145–151.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hines, J. 1984. The Scandinavian character of Anglian England in the pre-Viking period (= British Archaeological Reports. British Series 124). Oxford: B.A.R.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1990a. Philology, archaeology and the adventus Saxonum vel Anglorum . In A. Bammesberger & A. Wollmann (eds.), Britain 400–600: Language and history, 17–36. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1990b. The runic inscriptions of early Anglo-Saxon England. In A. Bammesberger & A. Wollmann (eds.), Britain 400–600: Language and history, 437–455. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hines, J. & B. Odenstedt. 1987. The Undley bracteate and its runic inscription. Studien zur Sachsenforschung 61. 73–94.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hogg, R. M. 1992. Phonology and morphology. In R. M. Hogg (ed.). The Cambridge history of the English language, volume I: The beginnings to 1066, 67–167. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holthausen, F. 1921. Altsächsisches Elementarbuch. 21. Auflage. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, T. 1977. Studien zur Wechselbeziehung zwischen altsächsischem und althochdeutschem Schreibwesen und ihrer sprach- und kulturgeschichtlichen Bedeutung. Göppingen: Kümmerle.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lass, R. 1994. Old English: A historical linguistic companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Looijenga, T. 1996. On the origin of the Anglo-Frisian runic innovations. In T. Looijenga & A. Quak (eds.), Frisian runes and neighbouring traditions (= Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 45), 109–122. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997. Runes around the North Sea and on the continent AD 150–700: Texts and contexts. Proefschrift (Ph.D. dissertation). Rijksuniversiteit van Groningen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003. Texts and contexts of the oldest runic inscriptions (= The Northern World 4). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Runic amulets and magic objects. Woodbridge: Boydell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McKinnell, J. & R. Simek (with K. Düwel). 2004. Runes, magic and religion: A sourcebook (= Studia Medievalia Septentrionalia 10). Wien: Fassbaender.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moltke, E. 1985. Runes and their origin, Denmark and elsewhere (transl. by P. G. Foote). Copenhagen: The National Museum of Denmark.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nedoma, R. 2006. Schrift und Sprache in den südgermanischen Runeninschriften. In A. Bammesberger & G. Waxenberger (eds.), Das fuþark und seine einzelsprachlichen Weiterentwicklungen, 109–156. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nielsen, H. F. 1991a. The Undley Bracteate, “Continental Anglian” and the early Germanic of Schleswig-Holstein. In J. O. Askedal, H. Bjorvand & E. F. Halvorsen (eds.), Festskrift til Ottar Grønvik på 75-årsdagen den 21. oktober 1991, 32–52. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1991b. The Straubing Heliand-Fragment and the Old English dialects. In P. Sture Ureland & G. Broderick (eds.), Language contact in the British Isles, 243–273. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1995. The emergence of the os and ac runes in the runic inscriptions of England and Frisia: A linguistic assessment. In V. F. Faltings, A. G. H. Walker & O. Wilts (eds.), Friesische Studien II, 19–34. Odense: Odense University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1998. The continental backgrounds of English and its insular development until 1154 (= A Journey through the History of the English Language in England and America I). Odense: Odense University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000. The early runic language of Scandinavia: Studies in Germanic dialect geography. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006. The vocalism of the Undley runes viewed from a North-Sea Germanic perspective. In A. Bammesberger & G. Waxenberger (eds.), Das fuþark und seine einzelsprachlichen Weiterentwicklungen, 209–216. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. New methods in early Germanic language research with special reference to comparative vowel typology. In H. Reichert & C. Scheungraber (eds.), Germanische Altertumskunde: Quellen, Methoden, Ergebnisse. Akten des Symposiums anlässlich des 150. Geburtstags von Rudolf Much, Wien, 28.-30. September 2012 (= Philologica Germanica, Bd. 35), 159–170. Wien: Fassbaender.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. The vowel systems of Old English, Old Norse and Old High German compared. In J. O. Askedal & H. F. Nielsen (eds.), Early Germanic languages in contact, 261–276. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Odenstedt, B. 1983. The inscription on the Undley bracteate and the beginnings of English runic writing (= Umeå Papers in English 5). Umeå: Department of English, Umeå University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1990. On the origin and early history of the runic script (= Acta Academiae Regiae Gustavi Adolph 59). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Page, R. I. 1985. Runic links across the North Sea in the pre-Viking-Age. In H. Bekker-Nielsen & H. F. Nielsen (eds.), Fjerde tværfaglige vikingesymposium, 31–49. Moesgård: Forlaget hikuin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1991. Anglo-Saxon runic studies: The way ahead? In A. Bammesberger (ed.), Old English runes and their continental background, 15–39. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996. On the baffling nature of Frisian runes. In T. Looijenga & A. Quak (eds.), Frisian runes and neighbouring traditions (= Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 45), 131–150. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999. An introduction to English runes. 2nd edn. Woodbridge: Boydell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. The position of Old English runes in the runic tradition. In J. O. Askedal, H. Bjorvand et al. (eds.), Zentrale Probleme bei der Erforschung der älteren Runen (= Osloer Beiträge zur Germanistik 41), 137–150. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parsons, D. 1994. The language of the Anglo-Saxon settlers. In H. F. Nielsen & L. Schøsler (eds.), The origins and development of emigrant languages, 141–156. Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996. The origins and chronology of the “Anglo-Frisian” additional runes. In T. Looijenga & A. Quak (eds.), Frisian runes and neighbouring traditions (= Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 45), 151–170. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999. Recasting the runes: The reform of the Anglo-Saxon Futhorc (= Runrön 14). Uppsala: Institutionen för nordiska språk, Uppsala Universitet.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suzuki, S. 2005. The Undley bracteate reconsidered: Archaeological, linguistic and runological perspectives. Anglo-Saxon Studies in Archaeology and History 131. 31–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valentin, P. 1969. Phonologie de l’allemand ancient: Les systèmes vocaliques. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1978. The simplification of the unstressed vowel systems in Old High German. In J. Fisiak (ed.), Recent developments in historical phonology, 374–389. The Hague: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waxenberger, G. 2006. The representation of vowels in unstressed syllables in the Old English runic corpus. In A. Bammesberger & G. Waxenberger (eds.), Das fuþark und seine einzelsprachlichen Weiterentwicklungen, 272–314. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

[no author supplied]
2025. Publications by Hans Frede Nielsen. In Germanic Interrelations [NOWELE Supplement Series, 34], ► pp. 9 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue