Cover not available

Article published In: NOWELE
Vol. 73:2 (2020) ► pp.193–220

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Case and preposition stranding in Old English free relatives

 | Australian National University
Published online: 16 October 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.00039.all
Abstract
2014. Old English syntax. In D. Ringe & A. Taylor (eds.), The development of Old English, 392–509. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar observes that some of the factual claims made in Allen, C. L. 1980. Movement and deletion in Old English. Linguistic Inquiry 111. 261–323.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar, the most thorough examination of free relatives in Old English to date, are not entirely correct. Taylor presents some examples that Allen’s analysis of Old English free relatives does not account for and proposes an alternative analysis in which the relative pronoun can be internal to the relative clause and the case of the pronoun is determined by the case hierarchy proposed by Harbert, W. 2007. The Germanic languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar for Gothic. This corpus-based study supplies new data showing that while Taylor’s relative-internal analysis is needed for some examples, the evidence does not support the suggested case hierarchy except in regulating optional case attraction. Latin influence may account for examples that do not fit the usual patterns.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Two analyses of free relatives
  • 3.Headed and free relatives in Old English
    • 3.1Headed relatives
    • 3.2Free relatives
      • 3.2.1Wh- relatives
      • 3.2.2Demonstrative pronouns and free relatives
      • 3.2.3Case marking and free relatives
  • 4.The investigation: Aims and methodology
  • 5.Wh- free relatives
    • 5.1Case marking of subject, object, and indirect object FRLs
    • 5.2Preposition stranding and pied piping
  • 6.Demonstrative pivots
    • 6.1Demonstrative-headed relatives
    • 6.2FRLs with demonstratives
      • 6.2.1Case marking
      • 6.2.2Pied piping and preposition stranding
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (18)
References
Allen, C. L. 1980. Movement and deletion in Old English. Linguistic Inquiry 111. 261–323.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2019. The definite article in Old English: Evidence from Ælfric’s Grammar. In N. Yáñez-Bouza, W. B. Hollmann, E. Moore & L. van Bergen (eds.), Categories, constructions and change in English syntax, 130–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. & J. Grimshaw. 1978. The syntax of free relatives in English. Linguistic Inquiry 91. 331–91.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clemoes, P. (ed.) 1997. Ælfric’s Catholic homilies: The first series (Early English Text Society Supplementary Series 17). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gisborne, N. & R. Truswell. 2017. Where do relative specifiers come from? In R. Truswell & É. Mathieu (eds.), Micro-change and macro-change in diachronic syntax, 25–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Godden, M. & S. Irvine (eds.). 2009. The Old English Boethius: An edition of the Old English versions of Boethius’s De consolatione philosophiae, 21 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Groos, A. & H. van Riemsdijk. 1981. Matching effects in free relatives: A parameter of core grammar. In A. Belletti, L. Brandi & L. Rizzi (eds.), Theory of markedness in generative grammar: Proceedings of the 1979 GLOW conference, 171–216. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harbert, W. 2007. The Germanic languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Kemenade, A. 1987. Syntactic case and morphological case in the history of English. Dordrecht: Forris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Magennis, H. (ed.) 2002. The Old English life of Saint Mary of Egypt. Exeter: Exeter Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Randall, B. 2000. Corpussearch: A Java program for searching syntactically annotated corpora, Philadelphia: Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, H. 2006. Free relatives. In M. Everaert & H. C. van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. 11, 339–382. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, A. 2008. Contact effects of translation: Distinguishing two kinds of influence in Old English. Language Variation and Change 201. 341–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. Old English syntax. In D. Ringe & A. Taylor (eds.), The development of Old English, 392–509. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walkden, G. 2014. Syntactic reconstruction and Proto-Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wormald, P. 1999. The making of English law: King Alfred to the twelfth century. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
YCOE = Pintzuk, S. & L. Plug. 2002. The York-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Poetry (YCOE), Department of Linguistics, University of York, Distributed by the Oxford Text Archive, first edition, ([URL]).
York Poetry Corpus = Taylor, A., A. Warner, S. Pintzuk, & F. Beths. 2003. The York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose, York: Department of Language and Linguistic Science, University of York, Distributed by the Oxford Text Archive. First edition. [URL]
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue