Cover not available

Article published In: Runic Inscriptions and the Early History of the Germanic Languages
Edited by Robert Nedoma and Hans Frede Nielsen †
[NOWELE 73:1] 2020
► pp. 123–152

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The early Celtic epigraphic evidence and early literacy in Germanic languages

 | Maynooth University
Published online: 29 April 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.00037.sti
Abstract
This paper outlines the individual histories of the attested ancient Celtic epigraphic traditions, Cisalpine Celtic, Celtiberian, Gaulish and Ogam-Irish. It discusses the types of literacy in each of them and presents them as examples of how and under which conditions literacy arose and grew, and finally disappeared, in non-classical languages of antiquity. Where possible, the Celtic languages are viewed against an early Germanic background, to highlight similarities and parallels between the two philological areas, but also to contrast the differences between them and to give an account of where and when opportunities of literate interaction may have arisen between the two groups. These zones of potential interaction, as well as uncommon shapes of letters in some Celtic writing systems, are of relevance for the concluding section where observations from a Celtologist’s point of view will be made that may have a bearing on the origins of Runic writing.
Article outline
  • 1.Preliminaries
    • 1.1Cisalpine Celtic – Lepontic and Cisalpine Gaulish
    • 1.2Celtiberian
    • 1.3Gaulish
    • 1.4Ogam Irish
    • 1.5Marginal and imaginary writing traditions
  • 2.Celtic and Germanic
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (67)
References
Beltrán Lloris, F. & C. Jordán Cólera. 2017. Celtiberian. Language, Writing, Epigraphy. Prensas de la Universidad de Zaragoza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Birkhan, H. (Hrsg.). 2007. Kelten-Einfälle an der Donau. Akten des Vierten Symposiums deutschsprachiger Keltologinnen und Keltologen. (Linz/Donau, 17.–21. Juli 2005). Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
CIIC = R. A. S. Macalister. 1945. Corpus Inscriptionum Insularum Celticarum. Dublin: Stationery Office.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delamarre, X. 2003. Dictionnaire de la langue gauloise. 2nd edn. Paris: Errance.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Marinis, R. C. 2009. Sesto Calende, loc. cascina Presualdo: coppa con iscrizione. In R. C. De Marinis, S. Massa & M. Pizzo (eds.), Alle origini di Varese e del suo territorio: le collezioni del sistema archeologico provinciale, 157–159. Rome: Bretschneider.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Egger, R. 1927. Ausgrabungen in Kärnten 1924–1926. Carinthia 1171. 1–4.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1936. Ausgrabungen auf dem Maria-Saaler Berge. Carinthia 1261. 87–92.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1968. Zum vorlateinischen Alphabet der Noriker. Arheološki Vestnik 191. 37–42.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eska, J. F. 2004. Continental Celtic. In R. D. Woodard (ed.), The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the World’s Ancient Languages, 857–880. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017. Phonological contrasts and character reduction in the alphabet of Lugano. Zeitschrift für celtische Philologie 641. 59–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017b. 70. The syntax of Celtic. In Klein et al. 2017, 1218–1249.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017c. 72. The dialectology of Celtic. In Klein et al. 2017, 1264–1274.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eska, J. F. & D. Ellis Evans. 2009. Continental Celtic. In M. J. Ball & N. Müller (eds.), The Celtic Languages. 2nd edn., 28–54. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eska, J. F. & R. E. Wallace. 1999. The linguistic milieu of *Oderzo 7. Historische Sprachforschung 112/11. 122–136.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eska, J. F. 2013. Review of Koch 2009 and Koch 2011. Kratylos 581. 58–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Estarán Tolosa, M. J. 2016. Epigrafía bilingüe del Occidente romano. El latín y las lenguas locales en las inscripciones bilingües y mixtas. Prensas de la Universidad de Zaragoza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faulmann, C. 1880. Das Buch der Schrift enthaltend die Schriftzeichen und Alphabete aller Zeiten und aller Völker des Erdkreises. 2nd edn. Wien: K.-K. Hof- und Staatsdruckerei.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferrer i Jané, J. 2005. Novetats sobre el sistema dual de diferenciació gràfica de les oclusives sordes i sonores. In F. Beltrán Lloris, C. Jordán Cólera & J. Velaza Frías (eds.), Actas del IX Coloquio sobre lenguas y culturas paleohispánicas. Barcelona, 20–24 de octubre de 2004, 957–982. Zaragoza: Institución “Fernando el Católico”.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hesperia = J. de Hoz et al. 2005–. Hesperia. Banco de datos de lenguas paleohispánicas. Madrid. URL: [URL]
Hitz, H.-R. 2007. Lassen sich die Inschriften von Glozel in Frankreich unter den Altkeltischen Texten einordnen? In Birkhan 2007, 279–305.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jordán Cólera, C. 2005. ¿Sistema dual de escritura en celtibérico? In F. Beltrán Lloris, C. Jordán Cólera & J. Velaza Frías (eds.), Actas del IX Coloquio sobre lenguas y culturas paleohispánicas. Barcelona, 20–24 de octubre de 2004, 1013–1030. Zaragoza: Institución “Fernando el Católico”.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2019. Lengua y Epigrafía Celtibéricas. 21 vols. Zaragoza: Prensas de la Universidad de Zaragoza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, J. S. & B. Joseph, M. Fritz (eds.). 2017. Handbook of Comparative and Historical Indo-European Linguistics. An International Handbook. Vol. II1. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koch, J. T. 2009. Tartessian: Celtic in the South-west at the Dawn of History. Aberystwyth: Celtic Studies Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. Tartessian 2: The Inscription of Mesas do Castelinho. ro and the Verbal Complex. Preliminaries to Historical Phonology. Aberystwyth: Celtic Studies Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambert, P.-Y. 2003. La langue gauloise. Description linguistique, commentaire d’inscriptions choisies. 2nd edn. Paris: Errance.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambert, P.-Y. & D. Stifter. 2012. Le plomb gaulois de Rezé. Études Celtiques 381. 139–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambert, P.-Y. & J. Viret, K. Stüber, D. Stifter, L. Repanšek. 2013. La défixion gauloise de Chartres. Études Celtiques 391. 123–192 [repr. Paris: CNRS Editions 2014].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lejeune, M. 1971. Lepontica. Études Celtiques 121. 337–500 [repr. Paris: Les belles lettres 1971].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
LexLep = D. Stifter, C. Salomon, M. Vignoli, M. Braun, E. Lettner, M. Schwarz et al. 2009–. Lexicon Leponticum (LexLep). Vienna. URL: [URL]
Maras, D. F. 2014. Breve storia della scrittura celtica d’Italia. Ziχu. Studi sulla cultura di Golasecca 11. 73–93.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McManus, D. 1991. A Guide to Ogam. Maynooth: An Sagart.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MLH IV = J. Untermann. 1997. Monumenta Linguarum Hispanicarum. Vol. IV. Die tartessischen, keltiberischen und lusitanischen Inschriften. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morandi, A. 2004. Celti d’Italia. Vol. II. Epigrafia e lingua dei Celti d’Italia. Roma: Spazio Tre.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Motta, F. 2000. La documentazione epigrafica e linguistica. In R. C. de Marinis & S. Biaggio Simona, I Leponti tra mito e realtà. Vol. II1, 181–222. Locarno: Gruppo Archeologia Ticino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nedoma, R. 1995. Die Inschrift auf dem Helm B von Negau. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Deutung norditalischer epigraphischer Denkmäler. Wien: Fassbaender.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ogham in 3D = N. White et al. 2012–. Ogham in 3D. Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies. URL: [URL]
Pittioni, R. 1937. Zur Frage der Echtheit des Knochenpfriemens vom Maria-Saaler-Berg. Norsk Tidskrift for Sprogvidenskap 81. 460–466.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rieckhoff, S. 2007. Wo sind sie geblieben? – Zur archäologischen Evidenz der Kelten in Süddeutschland im 1. Jahrhundert v. Chr. In Birkhan 2007, 409–440.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Röttger, Ch. 2018. Imitation eines Münztyps aus der Prägung des Oppidums Bratislava, aus der Marchgegend. Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Numismatischen Gesellschaft 58/21. 81–90.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
RIG I = M. Lejeune. 1985. Recueil des inscriptions gauloises (R.I.G.). Vol. I. Textes gallo-grecs. Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
RIG II.I = M. Lejeune. 1988. Recueil des inscriptions gauloises (R.I.G.). Vol. II.11. Textes gallo-étrusques. Textes gallo-latins sur pierre. Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
RIG II.2 = P.-Y. Lambert. 2002. Recueil des inscriptions gauloises (R.I.G.). Vol. II.21. Textes gallo-latins sur instrumentum. Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
RIG III = P.-M. Duval & G. Pinault. 1986. Recueil des inscriptions gauloises (R.I.G.). Vol. III. Les calendriers. Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
RIG IV = J.-B. Colbert de Beaulieu & B. Fischer. 1998. Recueil des inscriptions gauloises (R.I.G.). Vol. IV1. Les légendes monétaires. Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz-Darasse, C. & A. Mullen. 2018. Gaulish Language, Writing, Epigraphy . Prensas de la Universidad de Zaragoza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russell, P. 2017. 73. The evolution of Celtic. In Klein et al. 2017, 1274–1297.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schrijver, P. 2014. Language Contact and the Origins of the Germanic Languages. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schumacher, St. 2004. Die rätischen Inschriften. Geschichte und heutiger Stand der Forschung. 2nd edn. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. Val Camonica, Inschriften. In H. Beck et al. (eds.), Reallexikon der germanischen Altertumskunde. Vol. 35: Speckstein bis Zwiebel, 334–337. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stifter, D. 2009. Vernacular Celtic Writing Traditions in the East-Alpine Region in the Iron-Age Period? In R. Karl & J. Leskovar (eds.), Interpretierte Eisenzeiten. Fallstudien, Methoden, Theorie. Tagungsbeiträge der 3. Linzer Gespräche zur interpretativen Eisenzeitarchäologie, 361–372. Linz: Oberösterreichisches Landesmuseum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. Lepontische Studien: Lexicon Leponticum und die Funktion von san im Lepontischen. In K. Stüber et al. (eds.), Akten des 5. Deutschsprachigen Keltologensymposiums, Zürich, 7.–10. September 2009, 359–374. Wien: Praesens Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010b. Neue Inschriften in norditalischer Schrift aus Österreich. In R. Nedoma & D. Stifter (eds.), *h2nr. Festschrift für Heiner Eichner, 233–240. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010–11. New early second-century Gaulish texts from La Graufesenque (L-143a–c). Keltische Forschungen 51. 197–227.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. Old Celtic (Celtic Spring in Copenhagen, Roots of Europe – Language, Culture, and Migrations). Copenhagen. URL: [URL]
2012b. Inscriptiones Pseudocelticae. Wrong and premature ascriptions of inscriptions as Celtic. In R. Karl, J. Leskovar & St. Moser (eds.), Interpretierte Eisenzeiten. Die erfundenen Kelten – Mythologie eines Begriffes und seine Verwendung in Archäologie, Tourismus und Esoterik. Tagungsbeiträge der 4. Gespräche zur interpretativen Eisenzeitarchäologie, 293–301. Linz: Oberösterreichisches Landes-museum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. Keltische Schriftsysteme. Historische Sprachforschung 1281. 236–259.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015b. Über die germanischen Namen auf den boischen Grosssilbern. In H. Reichert & C. Scheungraber (eds.), Germanische Altertumskunde: Quellen, Methoden, Ergebnisse. Akten des Symposiums anlässlich des 150. Geburtstags von Rudolf Much. Wien, 28.–30. September 2012, 349–354. Wien: Fassbaender.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017. 68. The phonology of Celtic. In Klein et al. 2017, 1188–1202.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2020. Cisalpine Celtic. Language, writing, epigraphy. Prensas de la Universidad de Zaragoza.
Stüber, K. 2017. 69. The morphology of Celtic. In Klein et al. 2017, 1203–1218.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uhlich, J. 1999. Zur sprachlichen Einordnung des Lepontischen. In St. Zimmer, R. Ködderitzsch & A. Wigger (eds.), Akten des zweiten deutschen Keltologensymposiums (Bonn, 2.–4. April 1997), 277–304. Tübingen: Niemeyer [repr. as: 621. On the linguistic classification of Lepontic. In R. Karl & D. Stifter (eds.) 2007, The Celtic World. Critical Concepts in Historical Studies. Vol. IV. Celtic Linguistics, 45–73. London – New York: Routledge].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vath, B. & S. Ziegler. 2017. 67. The documentation of Celtic. In Klein et al. 2017, 1168–1188.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodtko, D. 2017. Lusitanian. Language, writing, epigraphy. Prensas de la Universidad de Zaragoza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017b. 71. The lexicon of Celtic. In Klein et al. 2017, 1250–1264.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zeidler, J. 2003. A Celtic Script in the Eastern La Tène Culture? Études Celtiques 351. 69–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ziegler, S. 1994. Die Sprache der altirischen Ogam-Inschriften. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue