In:Close Engagements with Artificial Companions: Key social, psychological, ethical and design issues
Edited by Yorick Wilks
[Natural Language Processing 8] 2010
► pp. 35–56
Arius in cyberspace
Digital Companions and the limits of the person
Published online: 24 March 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/nlp.8.08oha
https://doi.org/10.1075/nlp.8.08oha
The relationship between a Companion and a person will become increasingly problematic as Companion technology improves and as models of users become increasingly sophisticated, and the simple dichotomies that make the Turing Test so plausible as a means of determining intelligence will become harder to maintain. As with any kind of content-storing technology, such as writing, or in more recent years laptops, the amount and quality of cognition that a human can ‘export’ to these outside technologies is significant. The ‘person’ or ‘agent’ can be seen as an extended system including the technologies as well as the human, in which the technologies, among other things, can help in the extension of trust towards the human.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Mattar, Nikita & Ipke Wachsmuth
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
