Reduced relatives judged hard require constraint-based analyses

Filip, Hana; Tanenhaus, Michael K.; Carlson, Greg N.; Allopenna, Paul D.; Blatt, Joshua

doi:10.1075/nlp.4.14fil

In:The Lexical Basis of Sentence Processing: Formal, computational and experimental issues
Edited by Paola Merlo and Suzanne Stevenson
[Natural Language Processing 4] 2002
► pp. 255–279

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

Reduced relatives judged hard require constraint-based analyses

Published online: 11 July 2002

https://doi.org/10.1075/nlp.4.14fil

Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Order by:

Pereplyotchik, David

2017. Computational Models and Psychological Reality. In Psychosyntax [Philosophical Studies Series, 129], ► pp. 181 ff.

Pereplyotchik, David

2017. The Psychological Reality of Syntactic Principles. In Psychosyntax [Philosophical Studies Series, 129], ► pp. 223 ff.

Duffield, Cecily Jill & Lise Menn

2014. Simplicity and complexity in constructions. The Mental Lexicon 9:2 ► pp. 232 ff.

McRae, Ken, Mary Hare & Michael K. Tanenhaus

2005. Meaning through syntax is insufficient to explain comprehension of sentences with reduced relative clauses: Comment on McKoon and Ratcliff (2003).. Psychological Review 112:4 ► pp. 1022 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.