Article published In: Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 27:1 (2017) ► pp.169–186
Restructuring structural narrative analysis using Campbell’s monomyth to understand participant narratives
Published online: 3 August 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.27.1.09cru
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.27.1.09cru
Abstract
In this paper, we describe a method for performing structural narrative analysis that draws on narratology and literary studies, moving structural narrative analysis from a focus on examining linguistic parts of narratives to understanding thematic structures that make up the whole narrative. We explore the possibility of constructing participant narratives using Campbell’s monomyth as a coding and structuralizing scheme. The method we describe is the response to the question, “How might we find a reliable way to construct ‘smooth’ stories (with attention to the structures of stories) so that we might compare trajectories of student experiences?” To answer this question, we use narrative interviews from a larger study to show how this method can make sense of interviews and construct accessible and useful participant narratives. We close by providing an example narrative constructed using the monomyth coding scheme and discussing benefits and difficulties associated with this method.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Literature review
- Structural narrative analysis, narratology, and linguistics
- Cognitive narratology
- Rethinking narrative structures: The monomyth
- Method
- Step 1.Familiarization with transcripts and pre-coding
- Step 2.Development of the coding scheme and application of codes
- Step 3.Compilation of narratives
- Discussion and conclusion
- Acknowledgements
References
References (20)
Connelly, M., & Clandinin, J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2–14.
Fludernik, M. & Olson, G. (2011). Introduction. In G. Olson (Ed.), Current trends in Narratology. Boston, MA: Walter De Gruyter.
Garcia, M. (2015). Literary narrative as cognitive structure in the brain. Narrative Inquiry, 25(1), 22–36.
Heinen, S. (2009). The role of narratology in narrative research across the disciplines. In S. Heinen & R. Sommer (Eds.), Narratologia: Narratology in the age of cross-disciplinary narrative research (pp. 193–211). Boston, MA: Walter de Gruyter.
Herman, D. (2007). Storytelling and the sciences of mind: Cognitive narratology, discursive psychology, and narratives in face-to-face interaction. Narrative, 15(3), 307–325.
(2009). Cognitive Narratology. In P. Hühn, J. Pier, W. Schmid & J. Schönert (Eds.), Handbook of Narratology (pp. 30–43). Boston, MA: Walter de Gruyter.
Kellam, N., Gerow, K., & Walther, J. (2015, June). Narrative Analysis in Engineering Education Research: Exploring Ways of Constructing Narratives to have Resonance with the Reader and Critical Research Implications. Paper presented at American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle. .
Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R. & Zilber, T. (1998). Narrative research: Reading, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Leeming, D. A. (2010). Monomyth. In D. A. Leeming, K. Madden, & S. Marlan (Eds.), Encyclopedia of psychology and religion (pp. 578–580). New York, NY: Springer Science.
Mitchell, M. C. & Egudo. M. (2003). A review of narrative methodology. Adelaide: DSTO Systems Sciences Laboratory. Retrieved from [URL]
Netolicky, D. (2015). Using literary metaphor and characters as structural and symbolic tools: Creating a layered story world while preserving participant anonymity. Narrative Inquiry, 25(2), 264–282.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(1), 5–23.
Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
Sommer, R. (2009). A cross-disciplinary approach to literary storytelling. In S. Heinen & R. Sommer (Eds.), Narratologia: Narratology in the age of cross-disciplinary narrative research (pp. 193–211). New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter.
Cited by (20)
Cited by 20 other publications
Al Sheikh, Hanan Muneer
Jackson, Alexandra, Cayla Ritz, Cheryl Bodnar, Cassandra Jamison, Kaitlin Mallouk & Mary Staehle
Tualaulelei, Eseta, Martin Kerby, Margaret Baguley & Alison Bedford
Cruz, Joshua & Kate T. Anderson
McCall, Cassandra, Stephen Secules, Gabriel Van Dyke, Maimuna Begum Kali & Vanessa Tran
Chance, Shannon, Ines Direito & Bill Williams
Cruz, Joshua, Lauren Griffith & Idera Lawal
Shanachilubwa, Kanembe, Gabriella Sallai & Catherine G. P. Berdanier
Wang, Lingxuan
Williams, Bill & Luísa Cagica Carvalho
Chance, Shannon M., Bill Williams & Ines Direito
Prokhorov, Artem
Prokhorov, Artem
Nazhandali, Leyla, Desen S. Ozkan, David P. Reeping, Liesl Baum & Lisa D. McNair
Boklage, Audrey, Brooke Coley & Nadia Kellam
Kellam, Nadia, Audrey Boklage & Brooke Coley
Cruz, Joshua & Nadia Kellam
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
