Article published In: Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 27:1 (2017) ► pp.66–84
Me and my custodial sentence
A case study on categorization work of young defendants
Published online: 3 August 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.27.1.04dol
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.27.1.04dol
Abstract
Trials are touchstones, which highlight rationalities of narrative identity construction. This study seeks to explore these rationalities from the perspective of young defendants. Predicated on narrative interviews before and after trials as well as on participant observations of the respective trials, we reconstruct identity-related categorizations of young defendants. Based on “Membership Categorization Analysis”, our focus is on the young defendants’ narrative depiction of their biographical criminal history and their self-presentation as subjects that have been (un)fairly treated and sentenced by penal professionals. Empirically, we use a case study to elaborate on the intricate challenge of identity construction when a severe punishment is imminent. Our results indicate a strategic form of narration, which mirrors the complexities and uncertainties of a trial.
Keywords: Membership Categorization Analysis, defendants, trials, youth crime
Article outline
- Introduction
- Narrative identities in legal contexts
- Methods and sample
- Analyzing membership categories
- Data
- Analyses
- Me and my looming punishment
- In youth courts, you better have problems
- Discussion
- Notes
References
References (52)
Antaki, C., & Widdicombe, S. (1998). Identity as an Achievement and as a Tool. In C. Antaki, & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in Talk (pp. 1–14). London: Sage.
Arnauld, A. v., & Martini, S. (2015). Unreliable Narration in Law Courts. In V. Nünning (Eds.), Unreliable Narration and Trustworthiness (pp. 347–370). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Ashworth, A., & Roberts, J. (2012). Sentencing: Theory, Principle, and Practice. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (pp. 866–894). (5th ed.). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
Atkinson, J. M., & Drew, P. (1979). Order in court: The organisation of verbal interaction in judicial settings. London: Macmillan.
Bamberg, M. (2004). Considering counter narratives. In M. G. W. Bamberg & M. Andrews (Eds.), Considering counter narratives (pp. 351–371). Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
(2012). Narrative Practices and Identity Navigation. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Varieties of Narrative Analysis (pp. 99–124). Los Angeles: Sage.
Brookman, F. (2015). The Shifting Narratives of Violent Offenders. In L. Presser & S. Sandberg (Eds.), Narrative Criminology (pp. 207–234). New York: NYU.
Butler, F. (2011). Rush to Judgment: Prisoners’ Views of Juvenile Justice. Western Criminology Review, 12(3), 106–119.
Drew, P. (1992). Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: the case of a trial for rape. In P. Drew, & J. Heritage (Eds), Talk at work (pp. 470–520). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ewick, P., & Silbey, S. S. (1995). Subversive Stories and Hegemonic Tales: Toward a Sociology of Narrative. Law & Society Review, 29(2), 197–226.
Fitzgerald, R. (2012). Membership categorization analysis: Wild and promiscuous or simply the joy of Sacks? Discourse Studies, 14(3), 305–311.
Hazel, N., Hagell, A. & Brazier, L. (2002). Young Offenders’ Perceptions of their Experiences in the Criminal Justice System. (Policy Research Bureau).
Heritage, J. (1990/1991). Intention, Meaning and Strategy: Observations on Constraints on Interaction Analysis. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 241, 311–332.
Hester, S. & Eglin, P. (1997). Membership Categorization Analysis: An Introduction. In S. Hester & P. Eglin (Eds.), Culture in Action (pp. 1–23). Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.
Housley, W. & Fitzgerald, R. (2002). The reconsidered model of membership categorization analysis. Qualitative Research, 2(I), 59–83.
Jackson, B. S. (1996). “Anchored narratives” and the interface of law, psychology and semiotics. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 1(1), 17–45.
Komter, M. (1997). Remorse, Redress, and Reform: Blame-Taking in the Courtroom. In M. Travers & J. F. Manzo (Eds.), Law in action (pp. 239–264). Aldershot: Ashgate.
(2013). Conversation Analysis in the Courtroom. In J. Sidnell, & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 612–629). Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
Labov, W. & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience. In J. Helm (Ed.). Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts (pp. 12–44). Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Leudar, I., Marsland, V. & Nekvapil, J. (2004). On Membership Categorization. “Us”, “Them” and “Doing Violence” in Political Discourse. Discourse & Society, 15(2–3), 243–266.
Loeschper, G. (1999). Bausteine für eine psychologische Theorie richterlichen Urteilens. Baden-Baden, DE: Nomos-Verl.-Ges.
Maruna, S. (2001). Making good. How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Princeton, N.J.: American Psychological Association.
Polletta, F., Chen, P. C. B., Gardner, B., & Motes, A. (2011). The Sociology of Storytelling. Annual Review of Sociology, 371, 109–130.
Presser, L. (2008). Been a heavy life. Stories of violent men. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
(2010). Collecting and Analyzing the Stories of Offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 21(4), 431–446.
Rajack-Talley, T., Talley, C. R., & Tewskbury, R. (2005). The Knowledge of Detained Juveniles About the Juvenile Justice System. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 561, 29–39.
Redding, R. E., & Fuller, E. J. (2004). What Do Juvenile Offenders Know About Being Tried as Adults? Implications for Deterrence. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 55(3), 35–44.
(1997). The Lawyer’s Work. In M. Travers & J. F. Manzo (Eds.), Law in action (pp. 43–49). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Sandberg, S. (2010). What can “Lies” Tell Us about Life? Notes toward a Framework of Narrative Criminology. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 21(4), 447–465.
Sandberg, S. & Ugelvik, T. (2016). The past, present, and future of narrative criminology. Crime, Media, Culture, 12(2), 129–136.
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics, 391, 462–482.
Scheppele, K. L. (1994). Practices of Truth-Finding in a Court of Law: The Case of Revised Stories. In T. R. Sarbin & J. I. Kitsuse (Eds.), Constructing the social (pp. 84–100). London: Sage.
Silverman, D. (1998). Harvey Sacks. Social science and conversation analysis. Oxford: Oxford University.
Stokoe, E. (2012). Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis. Discourse Studies, 14(3), 277–303.
Sykes, G. M. & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670.
Watson, D. R. (1976). Some Conceptual Issues in the Social Identification of Victims and Offenders. In E. C. Viano (Ed.), Victims and Society (pp. 60–71). Washington: Visage Press.
(1978). Categorization, Authorization and Blame-Negotiation in Conversation. Sociology, 12(1), 105–113.
Cited by (11)
Cited by 11 other publications
Azad, Azadé & Johanna Carlsson
Ghasseminejad, Melina & María-Ángeles Martínez
Bock, Katharina, Bernd Dollinger & Julia Rieger
Thole, Werner & Bernd Dollinger
Dollinger, Bernd, Stephanie Osawa & Sarah Schirmer
Bernd Dollinger & Selina Heppchen
Heppchen, Selina
Dollinger, Bernd
Dollinger, Bernd
Dollinger, Bernd
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
