Article published In: Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 25:1 (2015) ► pp.184–202
Between word and text in life narratives
Using discourse synthesis to model processes
Published online: 19 February 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.25.1.11kin
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.25.1.11kin
The purpose of this essay is to examine the relationships between “the oral” and “the written” in a particular application of narrative research (life rendering research). First, we examine a functional and valuing contrast between oral and written language within oral history methods. Second, we present a critical examination of the use of these linguistic predispositions as they impact life history narratives. Next, we examine a particularly close analogy between oral history and psychiatric patient write-up. Finally, the historical oral/written tension located in oral history practice is located within the frameworks of newer, media-based literacies. The tensions that these intentions create are particularly acute in power-based relationships, such as those between interviewers and informants. Therefore, the organization of the paper is a series of issues that combine to form a critical look at the use of informants’ words in the written narratives of the oral history as a form of discourse synthesis (Spivey, 1997).
Keywords: oral history, intertextuality, discourse synthesis
References (55)
Albers, P. (2007). Finding the artist within: Creating and reading visual texts in the English language arts classroom. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Bamberg, M. (2006). Stories: Big and small. Why do we care? Narrative Inquiry, 161, 139–147.
Barrett, R. (1999). The writing-talking cure: An ethnography of record-speech events in a psychiatric hospital. In C. Candlin & K. Hyland (Eds.), Writing: Texts, processes, and practices (pp. 244–266). New York, NY: Longman.
Brown, C.S. (1988). Like it was: A complete guide to writing oral history. New York, NY: Teachers and Writers Collaborative.
Clough, P. (1998). The end(s) of ethnography: From realism to social criticism, 2nd. Ed. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Daniels, A. (1983). Self-deception and self-discovery in fieldwork. Qualitative Sociology, 61, 195–214
Fischer, W., & Goblirsch, M. (2006). Biographical structuring: Narrating and reconstruction the self in research and professional practice. Narrative Inquiry, 161, 28–36.
Freeman, M. (2006). Life “on holiday”? In defense of big stories. Narrative Inquiry, 161, 131–138.
Frisch, M. (1990). A shared authority: Essays on the craft and meaning of oral and public history. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Gergen, M., & Gergen, K. (2006). Narratives in action. Narrative Inquiry, 161, 112–121.
Grosswiler, P. (1998). Method is the message: Rethinking McLuhan through critical theory. Montreal: Black Rose Books.
Jahandarie, K. (1999). Spoken and written discourse: An interdisciplinary perspective. Stamford, CT: Ablex.
Johnstone, B. (2006). A new role for narrative in variationist sociolinguistics. Narrative Inquiry, 161, 46–55.
Jones, R. (2004). Blended voices: Crafting narrative from oral history interviews. Oral History Review, 31(1), 23–42.
King, J. (1990). Collaborative life history narratives: Heroes in reading teachers’ tales. Qualitative Studies in Education, 4(1), 45–60.
King, J., Stahl, N.A., & Barksdale, M. (December, 2002). Interpretive issues in using oral and life history methods in education. Paper presented at the
National Reading Conference
.
Krause, W. (2006). The narrative negotiation of identity and belonging. Narrative Inquiry, 161, 103–111.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. New York, NY: Routledge.
Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
Lummis, T. (1988). Listening to history: The authenticity of oral evidence. Totowa, NJ: Barnes and Noble Books.
Luttrell, W. (1996). Taking care of literacy: One feminist’s critique. Educational Policy, 101, 342–65.
Newkirk, T. (1996). Seduction and betrayal in qualitative research. In P. Mortensen & G. Kirsch (Eds.), Ethics and representation in qualitative studies of literacy (pp. 3–16). Urbana, IL: NCTE.
Olson, D. (1977). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 471, 257–281.
Olson, G. (1999). Encountering the other: Postcolonial theory and composition scholarship. In F. Gale, P. Sipiora, & J. Kinneavy (Eds.), Ethical issues in college writing (pp. 91–105). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
. (1991). Art of the contact zone. Profession, 911, 33–40. New York, NY: Modern Language Association.
Preuss, G. (2004, September 9). Editing confusion. [URL]
Sarbin, T.R. (Ed.). (1986). Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human contact. Westport, CN: Praeger.
Spivey, N. (1997). The constructivist metaphor: Reading, writing, and the making of meaning. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Spivey, N., & King, J. (1990). Readers as writers composing from sources. Reading Research Quarterly, 24 (2), 7–26.
Stokoe, E. & Edwards, D. (2006). Story formulations in talk-in-interaction. Narrative Inquiry, 161, 56–65.
Taylor, S. (2006). Narrative as construction and discursive resource. Narrative Inquiry, 161, 94–102.
Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Welsh, J., Kozdras, D., King, J., & Schneider, J. (2009). Media literacy summer camps. In J. Richards & C. Lassonde (Eds.), Literacy tutoring that works: A look at successful in-school, after-school and summer programs (pp. 182–195). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
. (2004, September 7). Editing confusion. [URL]
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Nelson, Nancy & James R. King
Woolhouse, Clare
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
