Cover not available

Article published In: Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 25:1 (2015) ► pp.57–69

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Feminist revision of oral history methodology for the study of armed conflicts

The case of ETA women

 | University of Basque Country. Bilbao
 | Universitat de Barcelona. Barcelona
Published online: 19 February 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.25.1.04rod
This article sets out presenting the methodological toolbox created for the study of very specific reality: the gathering of oral information in the study of armed conflicts. Taking as a valid reference the oral history technique, we explored new methodological processes that allowed us to reach the lives and stories of the people interviewed more deeply, with a closer approach to their lives, but at the same time respecting and ensuring maximum access and confidentiality. To do this, the oral history methodology was reviewed with the main contributions of feminist epistemology. Thereby, we created ex profeso new methodological processes adapted to study the role of women as violence perpetrators in armed conflicts. Our proposal expands up to 5 different phases with either technical or emotional functions. The validity of this new methodological toolbox has been tested through an extensive research in the armed conflict of the Basque Country (Spain) performing oral histories to 25 women and 10 men.
References (45)
Afonso, C., & Martin, C. (2013). Memoría para la vida. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alison, M. (2009). Women and political violence: Female combatants in ethno-national conflicts. New York & London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andrews, M., Sclater, S.D., Squire, C., & Treacher, A. (Eds.). (2000). Lines of narrative: Psychosocial perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ashfar, H. (2003). Women and wars: Some trajectories towards a feminist peace. Development in Practice, 131, 178–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Behar, R. (1996). The vulnerable observer: Anthropology that breaks your heart. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berger, S., & Patai, D. (1991). Women’s word: The feminist practice of oral history. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casanova, I. (2007). ETA 1958-2008: Medio siglo de historia. Tafalla: Txalaparta.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Climo, J.J., & Cattell, M.C. (Eds.). (2002) Social memory and history: Anthropological perspectives. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cockburn, C. (2001). The gendered dynamics of armed conflict and political violence. In C. Moser & F.C. Clark (Eds.), Victims, perpetrators or actors? Gender, armed conflict and political violence. London & New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enloe, C. (2000). Bananas, beaches and based: Making feminist sense of international politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Esteban, M.L. (2004). Antropología encarnada. Antropología desde una misma. Papeles del CEIC, 121.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farr, V. (2005). La desmilitarización con perspectiva de género como herramientas para la construcción de la paz. Cuadernos INER, 21.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feinman, I.R. (2000). Citizenship rites: Feminist soldiers and feminist antimilitarists. New York & London: New York University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fivush, R., & Haden, C.A. (Eds.). (2003). Autobiographical memory and the construction of a narrative self: Developmental and cultural perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geiger, S. (1990). What’s so feminist about women’s oral history? Journal of Women’s History, 2(1), 169–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guillo, M. (2013). La incorporación de la investigación: políticas de la mestruación y cuerpos (re) productivos. Nómadas, 391, 233–245.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hasso, F.S. (2005). Discursive and political deployments by/of the 2002 Palestinian women suicide bombers/martyrs. Feminist Review, 811, 23–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamilton, C. (2000). Remembering the Basque nationalist family: Daughters, fathers and the reproduction of the radical nationalist community. Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies, 1(2), 153–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2007). The gender politics of political violence: Women armed activist of ETA. Feminist Review, 861, 132–148. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hughes, C., & Cohen, R.L. (2010). Feminists really do count: The complexity of feminist methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(3), 189–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ibarra, P. (1987). La evolución estratégica de ETA. Donostia: Kriselu.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Josselson, R., & Lieblich, A. (Eds.). (1993). Narrative study of lives. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krylova, A. (2005). Stalinist identity from the viewpoint of gender: Rearing a generation of professionally violent women-fighters in 1930s Stalinist Russia . In S. D’Cruze & A. Rao (Eds.), Violence, vulnerability and embodiment. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. (Eds.). (1998). Narrative research: Reading, analysis and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Letamendia, F. (1994). Historia del nacionalismo vasco y de E.T.A. San Sebastián: R&B Ediciones.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Magallón, C. (2006). Mujeres en pie de paz. Madrid: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mascia-Less, F. (2011). A companion to the anthropology of the body and embodiment. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mckay, S. (1998). The psychology of societal reconstruction and peace: A gendered perspective. In L.A. Lorentzen & J. Turpin (Eds.), The women and war reader. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mendia Azkue, I. (2008). Estrategias de organizaciones de mujeres para una paz con justicia de género. Bilbao: Hegoa institutua.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moser, C., & Clark, F. (Eds.). (2001). Perpetrators or actors? Gender, armed conflict and political violence. London and New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research. London & Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O´Keefe, T. (2013). Feminist identity development and activism in revolutionary movements. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parr, S. (2015). Integrating critical realist and feminist methodologies: Ethical and analytical dilemmas. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(2), 193–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plummer, K. (2001). Documents of life 2: An invitation to critical humanism. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Portelli, A. (1981). The particularities of oral history. History Workshop Journal, 12(1), 96–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reardon, B. (1993). Women and peace. Albany, NY: SUNY.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruddick, S. (1998). Women of peace: A feminist construction. In L. Lorentzen & J. Turpin (Eds.), The women and war reader. New York, NY: New York University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, W. (2002). So they understand: Cultural issues in oral history. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sharrif, F. (2014). Establishing field relations through shared ideology: Insider self-positioning as a precarious/productive foundation in multisited studies. Field Methods, 26(1), 3–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, S., & Watson, J. (2001). Reading autobiography: A guide for interpreting life narratives. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Summerfield, P. (2004). Culture and composure: Creating narratives of the gendered self in oral history interviews. Cultural and Social History, 1(1), 65–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomson, A. (2007). Four paradigm transformations in oral history. Oral History Review, 34(1), 49–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yow, V. (1997). ‘Do I like them too much?’: Effects of the oral history interview on the interviewer and vice-versa. Oral History Review, 24(1), 55–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue