Article published In: Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 24:2 (2014) ► pp.347–367
Emotion prosody and viewer engagement in film narrative
A social semiotic approach
Published online: 24 November 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.24.2.09fen
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.24.2.09fen
This study adopts a social semiotic approach to model the dynamics of character emotion and the discursive mechanisms of viewer engagement in film narrative. Drawing upon the systemic functional semiotics (Halliday and Matthiessen, 2004), this paper proposes a metafunctional framework to elucidate how film characters’ emotions are ideationally construed, interpersonally enacted, and textually organized as a “prosody”. The explication of emotion prosody provides an explicit framework to explain the multi-dimensional, dynamic construction of narrative discourse. With the metafunctional model of emotion prosody, the fundamental mechanisms of viewer engagement, namely, allegiance, empathy and expectancy, are elucidated in a coherent discourse-based framework. Compared to schema-based cognitive film studies that focus on viewers’ emotional reactions, the social semiotic discourse analysis provides a more explicit and analytically reliable framework to explain the multi-dimensional construction of film narrative and the discursive mechanisms of viewer engagement.
References (46)
Bateman, J.A. (2007). Towards a grande paradigmatique of film: Christian Metz reloaded. Semiotica, 1671, 13–64.
Bordwell, D., & Carroll, N. (1996). Post-theory: Reconstructing film studies. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Brewer, W.F., & Lichtenstein, E.H. (1982). Stories are to entertain: A structural affect theory of stories. Journal of Pragmatics, 61, 473–483.
Coplan, A. (2006). Catching characters’ emotions: Emotional contagion responses to narrative fiction film. Film Studies, 81, 26–38.
Feng, D. (2012). Modeling appraisal in film: A social semiotic approach. Unpublished PhD Thesis, National University of Singapore.
Gregory, M. (1995). Generic expectancies and discoursal surprises: John Donne’s The good morrow. In P.H. Fries & M. Gregory (Eds.), Discourse in society: Systemic functional perspectives (pp. 67–84). Norwood, N. J.: Ablex.
Grodal, T. (1997). Moving pictures: A new theory of film genres, feeling and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Arnold.
Halliday, M.A.K., & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.
Hjelmslev, L. (1961). Prolegomena to a theory of language (Translated by F. J. Whitfield). Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.
Hogan, P.C. (2003). The mind and its stories: Narrative universals and human emotion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Hood, S.E., & Forey, G. (2008). The interpersonal dynamics of call-centre interactions: co-constructing the rise and fall of emotion. Discourse and Communication, 2(4): 389–409.
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12–44). Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Martin, J.R. (1992). English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (1996). Evaluating disruption: Symbolising theme in junior secondary narrative. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 124–171). London: Longman.
. (1997). Analyzing genre: Functional parameters. In F. Christie & J.R. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 3–39). London: Cassell.
Metz, C. (1974). Film language: A semiotics of the cinema (Translated by M. Taylor). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ortony, A., Clore, G.L., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J., & Tannenbaum, P.H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Pence, J. (2006). Narrative emotion: Feeling, form and function. Journal of Narrative Theory, 34(3), 273–276.
Plantinga, C. (1999). The scene of empathy and the human face on film. In C. Plantinga & G.M. Smith (Eds.), Passionate views: Film, cognition, and emotion (pp. 239–255). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Poynton, C. 1985. Language and gender: Making the difference. Geelong, Vic.: Deakin University Press.
Schank, R.C., & Abelson, R.P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Scherer, K.R. (1984). On the nature and function of emotion: A component process approach. In K.R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 293–318). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Smith, C.A. (1989). Dimensions of appraisal and physiological response in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 561, 339–353.
Smith, M. (1995). Engaging characters: Fiction, emotion, and the cinema. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tan, E.S. (1996). Emotion and the structure of narrative film: Film as an emotion machine. Mahwah, N. J: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Thibault, P.J. (2000). The multimodal transcription of a television advertisement: Theory and practice. In A.P. Baldry (Ed.), Multimodality and multimediality in the distance learning age (pp. 311–385). Campobasso: Palladino Editore.
Tseng, C. (2009). Cohesion in film and the construction of filmic thematic configuration: A functional perspective. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Bremen: University of Bremen.
Uldall, E.T. (1960). Attitudinal meanings conveyed by intonation contours. Language and Speech, 31, 223–234.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Steele, Godfrey A.
Wang, Jiayu & Jinyan Liu
Hood, Susan
Pérez-Arredondo, Carolina & Camila Cárdenas-Neira
Choi, Grace Y.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
