Article published In: Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 24:2 (2014) ► pp.239–258
Telling the moment
Seeing a UFO
Published online: 24 November 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.24.2.04woo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.24.2.04woo
In this paper we examine how the features of an on-going experience are identified as having subsequently reportable properties. Using transcripts of the audio track of a video posted on YouTube purporting to capture the movements of a UFO (or at least, ostensibly anomalous lights in the sky), the analysis examines how the participants exhibit and negotiate their understanding of the object/lights, how they evaluate the evidence provided by the video in comparison to what they can see, and the way that another’s failure to see the same phenomenon is managed to ensure that the absence of corroboration does not undermine implicit claims about its objectivity and potentially anomalous features.
Keywords: anomalous experiences, tellability, interaction, seeing, epistemics
References (57)
Bartholomew, R.E., & Howard, G.S. (1998). UFOs and alien contact. Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books.
Branton, J., & McVicker, L. (2011). Mysterious flying object identified. The Columbian, 9th March 2011. Available at: [URL] [Accessed 27th July 2011].
Brunvand, J.H. (1981). The vanishing hitchhiker: Urban legends and their meanings. Glasgow, UK: Picador.
Castro, M., Burrows, R., and Wooffitt, R. The paranormal is (still) normal: The sociological implications of a survey of paranormal experiences in Great Britain. Sociological Research Online, 19 (3), 16 <[URL]>
De Fina, A. (2009). Narratives in interview - The case of accounts. Narrative Inquiry, 19(2), 233–258.
Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 3–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Friedman, A. (2011). Toward a sociology of perception: Sight, sex and gender. Cultural Sociology, 5(2), 187–206.
Garfinkel, H., Lynch, M., & Livingston, E. (1981). The work of discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar. Philosophy of Social Science, 11(2), 131–158.
. (2000b). Practices of seeing: Visual analysis, an ethnomethodological approach. In T. Van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 157–182). London: Sage Publications.
Greyson, B. (2000). Near-death experiences. In E. Cardeña, S.J. Lynn & S. Krippner (Eds.), Varieties of anomalous experience: Examining the scientific evidence (pp. 315–352). Washington DC: The American Psychological Association.
Gurney, E., Myers, F.W.H.,& Podmore, F. (1886). Phantasms of the living Vol. 21. London: Trubner.
Hartswood, M., Proctor, R., Rouncefield, M., & Slack, R. (2001). Performance management in breast screening: A case of professional vision and ecologies of practice. Journal of Cognition, Technology and Work, 4(2), 91–100.
Hay, D. (1982). Exploring inner space: Science and religious experience. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.
. (2012a). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29.
. (2012b). The epistemic engine: Sequence organisation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 30–52.
Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 15–38.
Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C. (2000). Sharing the tools of the trade: The interactional constitution of workplace objects. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 29(5), 523–562.
Hufford, D. (1982). The terror that comes in the night: An experience-centred study of supernatural assault traditions. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Hunter, J., & Luke, D. (Eds.). (2014). Talking with spirits: Ethnographies from between the worlds. Brisbane, Australia: Daily Grail Publishing.
Jefferson, G. (1979). A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination. In G. Psathas, (Ed.). Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. PAGES). New York: Irvington Publishers.
. (1984). On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 346–370). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jefferson, G., Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E.A. (1987). Notes on laughter in pursuit of intimacy. In G. Button & J.R.E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social structure (pp. 152–205). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Kjærbeck, S., & Asmuß, B. (2005). Negotiating meaning in narratives: An investigation of the interactional construction of the punchline and the post punchline sequences. Narrative Inquiry, 15(1), 1–24.
Kochmann, T., LeBaron, C., Goodwin, C., & Feltovich, P. (2010). ‘Can you see the cystic artery yet?’: A simple matter of trust. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 521–541.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills: Princeton University Press.
Laurier, E., & Brown, B. Cultures of seeing: Pedagogies of the riverbank. Unpublished MS. Available at [URL]
Law, J., & Lynch, M. (1988). Lists, field guides and the descriptive organization of seeing: Birdwatching as an exemplary observational activity. Human Studies, 11(2-3), 217–303.
Mondada, L. (2013). Displaying, contesting and negotiating epistemic authority in social interaction: Descriptions and questions in guided tours. Discourse Studies, 15(5), 597–626.
Norrick, N.R. (2005). The dark side of tellabillity. Narrative Inquiry, 15(2), 323–343.
. (2008). Negotiating the reception of stories in conversation: Teller strategies for modulating response. Narrative Inquiry, 18(1), 131–151.
Ohashi, Y., Wooffitt, R., Jackson, C., & Nixon, Y. (2013). Discourse, culture and extraordinary experiences: Observations from a comparative, qualitative analysis of Japanese and UK English accounts of paranormal phenomena. Western Journal of Communication, 77(4), 466–488.
Pomerantz, A.M. (1986) Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies 91, 219–229.
Psathas, G. (1991). The structure of direction giving in interaction. In D. Boden & D.H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology andconversation analysis. California: California University Press.
Rhine, L.E. (1981). The invisible picture: A study of psychic experiences. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation Vols. I & II1. edited by G. Jefferson & E.A. Schegloff. Oxford & Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
Schegloff, E.A. (1997). Narrative analysis: Thirty years later. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1-4), 97–106.
Singleton, A. (2002). The importance of narrative in negotiating otherworldly experiences: The case of speaking in tongues. Narrative Inquiry, 121, 351–373.
Stevenson, I. (1970). Telepathic impressions: A review and report of thirty-five new cases. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
Stivers, T. (2005). Modified repeats: One method for asserting primary rights from second position. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(2), 131–158.
Stivers, T., Mondada, L., & Steensig, J. (Eds.). (2011). The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Stokoe, E. (2011). ‘I’ve got a girlfriend’: Police officers doing ‘self-disclosure’ in their interrogations of suspects. Narrative Inquiry, 19(1), 154–182.
Weeks, P.A.D. (1995). The micrsociology of everyday life. In S.M. Hale (Ed.), Controversies in sociology (2nd Edn.). Toronto: Copp Clark Ltd.
Widdicombe, S., & Wooffitt, R. (1995). The language of youth subcultures: Social identity in action. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Wilkinson, S. and Kitzinger, C. (2006) Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(2), 150–182.
Wooffitt, R. (1992). Telling tales of the unexpected: The organisation of factual discourse. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Cited by (11)
Cited by 11 other publications
McVittie, Chris & Andy McKinlay
Bardina, Svetlana
Ironside, Rachael & Robin Wooffitt
Ironside, Rachael & Robin Wooffitt
Pérez Navarro, José M. & Xana Martínez Guerra
Pérez Navarro, José Miguel
Stockbridge, Germaine & Robin Wooffitt
Ironside, Rachael
Ironside, Rachael
Jackson, Clare
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
