Evaluative devices as a narrative tool for enacting relational complexity: A window into implicit meaning in adolescents’ narratives

Jović, Svetlana

doi:10.1075/ni.24.1.06jov

Article published In: Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 24:1 (2014) ► pp.113–131

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download PDF

Evaluative devices as a narrative tool for enacting relational complexity

A window into implicit meaning in adolescents’ narratives

Svetlana Jović | The Graduate Center, City University of New York

Published online: 28 October 2014

https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.24.1.06jov

In the present article, I explore how urban youth use narrating for self-presentation as they relate to diverse contexts and audiences. Diverse narrative genres employed in this study were used as a socio-cognitive tool for looking into enactments of relational complexity — a skill of adjusting one’s communications to audiences and contexts. Thirteen adolescents were asked to narrate about the most important aspects of their lives, using two different genres and addressing two different audiences. I explored youth’s systematically varied use of psychological state expressions, as they navigated through different genres and audiences. As adolescents narrate either about the negative experiences or for the imagined peer audience, their narrating involves more cognitive than affective expressions. This indicates that systematic changes take place in narrating as a socio-cognitive process when there is a need for more intense work around issues, either to figure out what is happening, or to try to present oneself in the best light to salient others.

Keywords: cognition, affect, adolescence, relational complexity, narrative genre, evaluative devices

References (19)

Bamberg, M., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2008). Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text & Talk, 28(3), 377–396.

Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Chayko, M. (2007). The portable community: Envisioning and examining mobile social connectedness. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 3(4), 373–385.

Daiute, C. (2014). Narrative inquiry: A dynamic approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

. (2011). “Trouble” in, around, and between narratives. Narrative Inquiry, 21(2), 329–336.

. (2010a). Human development and political violence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

. (2010b). Critical narrating by adolescents growing up in war: Case study across the former Yugoslavia. In K.C. McLean & M. Pasupathi (Eds.), Narrative development in adolescence (pp. 207–230). New York, NY: Springer US.

Daiute, C., & Nelson, K. (1997). Making sense of the sense making function of narrative evaluation. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1-4), 207–215.

Daiute, C., & Griffin, T.M. (1993). The social construction of written narrative. In C. Daiute (Ed.), The development of literacy through social interaction (pp. 97–120). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

Jović, S. (in press). Who you are is where you are: Urban youth’s context-dependent experiences of the important life aspects. In B. Selau & R. Fonseca (Eds.), Cultural-historical approach: Educational research in different contexts. Porto Alegre, Brazil: PUCRS University Press.

Kim, J., & Lee, J.R. (2011). The Facebook paths to happiness: Effects of the number of Facebook friends and self-presentation on subjective well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(6), 359–364.

Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1997/1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1-4), 3–38.

Lucić, L. (2012). How do youth make sense of interpersonal interactions and resolve conflicts with diverse groups? Dissertation, New York: The Graduate Center, City University of New York.

Ochs, E., Smith, R., & Taylor, C. (1989). Dinner narratives as detective stories. Cultural Dynamics, 21, 238–57.

Oliviera, M. (1999). The function of self-aggrandizing in story-telling. Narrative Inquiry, 9(1), 25–47.

Peterson, C., & McCabe, A. (1983). Developmental psycholinguistics: Three ways of looking at a child’s narrative. New York, NY: Plenum Press.

Reyes, A. (2011). “Racist!”: Metapragmatic regimentation of racist discourse by Asian American youth. Discourse and Society, 22(4), 458–473.

. (2005). Appropriation of African American slang by Asian American youth. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9(4), 509–532.

Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Order by:

Neuwirth, Lorenz S.

2022. Flipd App Reduces Cellular Phone Distractions in the Traditional College Classroom: Implications for Enriched Discussions and Student Retention. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice 24:2 ► pp. 386 ff.

Ahmed, Tanzina

2021. “Helping Me Learn New Things Every Day”: The Power of Community College Students’ Writing Across Genres. Written Communication 38:1 ► pp. 31 ff.

Jović, Svetlana

2020. The narrative games we play: Varied use of narrative strategies across genres and socioeconomic positions. Language & Communication 74 ► pp. 87 ff.

Jović, Svetlana

2023. Calling Out Injustice: Youth from Differently Privileged Backgrounds Narrate About Injustice. Human Arenas 6:1 ► pp. 41 ff.

Benevento, Ayşenur & Mukadder Okuyan

2019. Significance of protesters’ words during Gezi Park protests: finding implicit meanings in sticky notes and tweets. Social Movement Studies 18:4 ► pp. 482 ff.

Pipitone, Jennifer M. & Chitra Raghavan

2017. Socio-Spatial Analysis of Study Abroad Students’ Experiences in/of Place in Morocco. Journal of Experiential Education 40:3 ► pp. 264 ff.

Woolhouse, Clare

2017. Multimodal life history narrative. Narrative Inquiry 27:1 ► pp. 109 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.