Cover not available

Article published In: Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 33:1 (2023) ► pp.222–253

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

When it’s “now or never”

Multimodal practices for managing opportunities to initiate other-repair in collaborative storytelling

ORCiD logo with link | Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg
Published online: 30 November 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.21005.sat
Abstract
Individuals who share knowledge of past events may encounter different practical problems when engaging in the co-telling of those events. Drawing upon conversation analysis, this article investigates how co-tellers manage interpolated opportunities to initiate other-repair in collaborative storytelling. The analysis focuses on the placement of different repair operations on the story-in-progress and shows that co-tellers monitor the progressivity of the storytelling activity to identify proper places to initiate repair. Repairs that are initiated out of place can be oriented to as inappropriate and require more interactional work from participants. When tellers project the continuation of the story beyond a proper place, co-tellers display urgency for halting the story’s current trajectory, which shows their orientation to this moment as a last opportunity to initiate repair. This last possible point to repair the story-in-progress is what I call a “now or never” moment. Data stem from video-recorded collaboratively told stories in Spanish.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.(Collaborative) storytelling in conversation
  • 3.The progressivity of action trajectories and last opportunities to initiate other-repair
  • 4.Data and method
  • 5.Analysis
    • The proper place to initiate other-repair in collaborative storytelling
    • Initiating repair out of place
    • Managing last opportunities to initiate repair
  • 6.Results and Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (60)
References
Cantarutti, M. (2020). The Multimodal and Sequential Design of Co-Animation as a Practice for Association in English Interaction. University of York.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clift, R. (2016). Conversation Analysis (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Ono, T. (2007). ‘Incrementing’ in conversation. A comparison of practices in English, German and Japanese. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 17(4), 513–552. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (2017). A “Big Package”: Storytelling. In Interactional linguistics: Study language in social interaction (p. Online-Chapter D). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Thompson, S. A. (2005). A linguistic practice for retracting overstatements: ‘Concessive repair.’ In A. Hakulinen & M. Selting (Eds.), Studies in Discourse and Grammar (Vol. 171, pp. 257–288). John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Mundane talk at work: Multiactivity in interactions between professionals and their clientele. Discourse Studies, 20(2), 221–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M. (2020). Between Sound and Speech: Liminal Signs in Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 188–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dressel, D. (2020). Multimodal word searches in collaborative storytelling: On the local mobilization and negotiation of coparticipation. Journal of Pragmatics, 1701, 37–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dressel, D., & Satti, I. (2021). Embodied Coparticipation Practices in Collaborative Storytelling. Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion (ISSN 1617–1837), 221, 54–86.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ehmer, O., Satti, I., Martínez, A., & Pfänder, S. (2019). Un sistema para transcribir el habla en la interacción: GAT 2. Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift Zur Verbalen Interaktion (ISSN 1617–1837), 201, 64–114.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, B., & Heinemann, T. (2019). Telescoping responses to requests: Unpacking progressivity. Discourse Studies, 21(1), 38–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1984). Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In J. M. Atkinson (Ed.), Structures of Social Action (1st ed., pp. 225–246). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Günthner, S. (2000). Vorwurfsaktivitäten in der Alltagsinteraktion: Grammatische, prosodische, rhetorisch-stilistische und interaktive Verfahren bei der Konstitution kommunikativer Muster und Gattungen. Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haddington, P., Keisanen, T., Mondada, L., & Nevile, M. (Eds.). (2014). Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking. John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (2007). Intersubjectivity and progressivity in person (and place) reference. In N. J. Enfield & T. Stivers (Eds.), Person Reference in Interaction (pp. 255–280). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1972). Side sequences. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 294–338). Free Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1978). Sequential Aspects of Storytelling in Conversation. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction (pp. 219–248). Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keisanen, T., Rauniomaa, M., & Haddington, P. (2014). Suspending action. From simultaneous to consecutive ordering of multiple courses of action. In P. Haddington, T. Keisanen, L. Mondada, & M. Nevile (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking (pp. 109–133). John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendrick, K. H., & Holler, J. (2017). Gaze Direction Signals Response Preference in Conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(1), 12–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
König, K., & Oloff, F. (2018). Die Multimodalität alltagspraktischen Erzählens. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, 48(2), 277–307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In Language in the Inner City. Studies in the Black English Vernacular (pp. 354–396). University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lerner, G. H. (1992). Assisted storytelling: Deploying shared knowledge as a practical matter. Qualitative Sociology, 15(3), 247–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993). Collectivities in action: Establishing the relevance of conjoined participation in conversation. Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 13(2), 213–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, J. (1987). Couples sharing stories. Communication Quarterly, 35(2), 144–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Storytelling in Conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 492–507). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazeland, H., & Huiskes, M. (2001). Dutch ‘but’ as a sequential conjunction: Its use as a resumption marker. In M. Selting & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Studies in Discourse and Grammar (Vol. 101, p. 141). John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondada, L. (2020[2001]). Conventions for multimodal transcription. [URL]
(2007). Multimodal resources for turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse Studies, 9(2), 194–225. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). The temporal orders of multiactivity. Operating and demonstrating in the surgical theatre. In P. Haddington, T. Keisanen, L. Mondada, & M. Nevile (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking (pp. 34–75). John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Questions on the move: The ecology of question-answer sequences in mobility settings. In A. Deppermann & J. Streeck (Eds.), Pragmatics & Beyond New Series (Vol. 2931, pp. 161–202). John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norrick, N. R. (2004). Humor, tellability, and conarration in conversational storytelling. Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 24(1), 79–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ochs, E., Smith, R., & Taylor, C. (1989). Detective Stories At Dinnertime: Problem-Solving Through Co-Narration. Cultural Dynamics, 2(2), 238–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ogden, R. (2006). Phonetics and social action in agreements and disagreements. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(10), 1752–1775. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A., & Heritage, J. (2013). Preference. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 210–228). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quasthoff, U. M. (2001). Erzählen als interaktive Gesprächsstruktur. In K. Brinker, G. Antos, W. Heinemann, & S. F. Sager (Eds.), Text- und Gesprächslinguistik: Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung (pp. 1293–1309). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raymond, C. W. (2016). Intersubjectivity, Progressivity, and Accountability: Studies in Turn Design. University of California Los Angeles.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Bueno-, pues-, and bueno-pues-prefacing in Spanish conversation. In J. Heritage & M.-L. Sorjonen (Eds.), Studies in Language and Social Interaction (Vol. 311, pp. 59–96). John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Intersubjectivity, Normativity, and Grammar. Social Psychology Quarterly, 82(2), 182–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, J. D. (2013). Overall Structural Organization. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 257–280). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1995 [1971]). Lecture 4. Spouse talk. In Lectures on Conversation (Vol. 21, pp. 337–443). Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1974). An Analysis of the Course of a Joke’s Telling in Conversation. In R. Bauman & J. Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking (pp. 337–353). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1987). On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation. In J. R. E. L. Graham Button (Ed.), Talk and Social Organisation (pp. 54–69). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). Lectures on Conversation. Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair After Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97(5), 1295–1345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). When “others” initiate repair. Applied Linguistics, 21(2), 205–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up Closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289–327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selting, M., Auer, P., Barth-Weingarten, D., et al. (2009). Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2). Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift Zur Verbalen Interaktion (ISSN 1617–1837), 101, 353–402.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, T. (2004). “No no no” and Other Types of Multiple Sayings in Social Interaction. Human Communication Research, 30(2), 260–293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling: When Nodding Is a Token of Affiliation. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 41(1), 31–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, T., & Robinson, J. D. (2006). A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society, 35(03), 367–392. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, T., & Rossano, F. (2010). Mobilizing Response. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 43(1), 3–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Young, K. G. (1987). Joint Storytelling: Discourse and Interaction. In K. G. Young, Taleworlds and Storyrealms (Vol. 161, pp. 157–185). Springer Netherlands. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Sbertoli-Nielsen, Paul
2025. Multimodally aligning with projected continuation in Peninsular Spanish. Interactional Linguistics DOI logo
Raoufi, Azar
2024. Topicalizing peers’ language: Situated linguistic identities at workplaces. Journal of Pragmatics 232 ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Carranza, Ariel Vázquez
2022. Ritualized disbelief in Mexican Spanish talk-in-interaction. Spanish in Context 19:3 ► pp. 481 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue