Cover not available

Article published In: Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 32:2 (2022) ► pp.309–342

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Presenting self and aligning as a team through narratives of victimhood among Kazakh-speaking village neighbors

ORCiD logo with link | Rice University
Published online: 22 February 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.19112.kul
Abstract
This study illustrates how personal narratives of victimized self serve two Kazakh-speaking village neighbors to accomplish self-presentation during a mealtime interaction. Integrating Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar theorization of self-presentation with narrative positioning (Bamberg, M. (1997). Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1), 335–342. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar; (1996). Narrative as self-portrait: Sociolinguistic construction of identity. Language in Society, 25(2), 167–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar) and Muslim cultural practices (e.g., Al Zidjaly, N. (2006). Disability and anticipatory discourse: The interconnectedness of local and global aspects of talk. Communication & Medicine, 3(2), 101–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar), this study conceptualizes mealtime conversations as frontstage and examines two victimhood narratives after providing the sequential overview of the twelve narratives occurred in the interaction. The analysis illustrates how linguistic construction of agentive and epistemic selves of the narrators position them as victims (whose personal items are stolen) in relation to other neighbors (who do the act of stealing) in the story world. This juxtaposition of “I” vs. “Others” in the story world allows the neighbor-tellers to present an idealized self (morally superior neighbors) and function as a team by getting lower hand and aligning with one another against a third party (morally wrong neighbors) in the interaction.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Self-presentation and narrative discourse
  • Narratives and interactional teams
  • Victimhood, self-presentation, and getting the lower hand
  • Study method
    • Participants and data
    • Data analysis procedure
  • Analysis
    • Summary and sequence of the victimhood narratives
    • Narrative positioning and self-presentation
      • Narrative one “The lost knife”
      • Narrative two “The shared meat”
    • Narratives and functioning as a team
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (60)
References
Al Zidjaly, N. (2006). Disability and anticipatory discourse: The interconnectedness of local and global aspects of talk. Communication & Medicine, 3(2), 101–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). What has happened to Arabs? Identity and face management online. Multilingua, 31(4), 413–439. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Memes as reasonably hostile laments: A discourse analysis of political dissent in Oman. Discourse & Society, 28(6), 573–594. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bamberg, M. (1997). Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1), 335–342. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bamberg, M., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2008). Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text & Talk, 28(3), 377–396. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beeman, W. (1986). Language, status, and power in Iran. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Branner, R. (2005). Humorous disaster and success stories among female adolescents in Germany. In U. M. Quasthoff and T. Becker (Eds.) Narrative interaction (pp. 113–48), Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Fina, A. (2008). Who tells which story and why? Micro and macro contexts in narrative. Text & Talk, 28(3), 421–442. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2012). Analyzing Narratives. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deppermann, A. (2007). Using the other for oneself: Conversational practices of representing out-group members among adolescents. In M. Bamberg, A. De Fina, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), Selves and Identities in Narrative and Discourse (pp. 273–294). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eder, D. & Enke, J. L. (1991). The structure of gossip: Opportunities and constraints on collective expression among adolescents. American Sociological Review, 56(4), 494–508. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emler, N. (1994). Gossip, reputation, and social adaptation. In R. Goodman and A. Ben-Ze’ev (Eds.), Good Gossip (pp.117–138). Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gluckman, M. (1963). Gossip and scandal. Current Anthropology, 4(3), 307–316. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. H. (1990). Tactical uses of stories: Participation frameworks within girls’ and boys’ disputes. Discourse Processes, 13(1), 33–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (1979). The interactional construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psanthas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 97–121). New York: Irvington Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1984). Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 255–246). London, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gordon, C. (2003). Aligning as a team: Forms of conjoined participation in (stepfamily) interaction. Research on language and social interaction, 36(4), 395–431. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gumperz, J.I. (1992). Contextualization and understanding. In A. Duranti and C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context (pp. 229–252). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hegland, M. E. (1998). Flagellation and fundamentalism: (trans)forming meaning, identity, and gender through Pakistani women’s rituals of mourning. American Ethnologist, 25(2), 240–266. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, J. (2000). Politeness, power and provocation: How humour functions in the workplace. Discourse Studies, 2(2) 159–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keller-Cohen, D. & Gordon, C. (2003). “On trial”: Metaphor in telling the life story. Narrative Inquiry, 13(1), 1–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendall, S. and Tannen, D. (2001). Discourse and Gender. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 548–567). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacoby, S., & Ochs, E. (1995). Co-construction: An introduction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(3), 171–183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1979). A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance/ declination. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 79–96). New York: Irvington Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1988). On the Sequential Organization of Troubles-Talk in Ordinary Conversation. Social Problems, 35(4), 418–441. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, G., & Lee, J. R. E. (1981). The rejection of advice: Managing the problematic convergence of a ‘troubles-telling’ and a ‘service encounter’. Journal of Pragmatics, 5(5), 399–422. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jägervi, L. (2014). Who wants to be an ideal victim? A narrative analysis of crime victims’ self-presentation. Journal of Scandinavian studies in criminology and crime prevention, 15(1), 73–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In W. Labov (Ed.), Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English Vernacular (pp. 354–96). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, W., and Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative Analysis: oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12–44). Seattle/London: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lerner, G.H. (1992). Assisted storytelling: deploying shared knowledge as a practical matter. Qualitative Sociology, 15(3), 247–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lerner, G. H. (1993). Collectivities in action: Establishing the relevance of conjoined participation in conversation. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 13(2), 213–246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, J. (1987). Couples sharing stories. Communication Quarterly, 35(2), 144–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meanwell, E. (2013). Profaning the past to salvage the present: The symbolically reconstructed pasts of homeless shelter residents. Symbolic Interaction, 36(4), 439–456. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morris, C. (2018). ‘You can’t stand on a corner and talk about it…’: Medicinal cannabis use, impression management and the analytical status of interviews. Methodological Innovations, 11(1), 1–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mulholland, J. (1996). A series of story turns: Intertextuality and collegiality. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 16(4), 535–556. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ochs, E., & L. Capps. (2001). Living Narrative: Creating Life in everyday Storytelling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Omelicheva, M. Y. (2011). Islam in Kazakhstan: a survey of contemporary trends and sources of securitization. Central Asian Survey, 30(2), 243–256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raymond, G., & Heritage, J. (2006). The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society, 35(5), 677–705. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H. ([1970] 1992). Second stories; “Mm hm”; story prefaces; “local news”; tellability. In G. Jefferson (Ed.), Harvey Sacks: Lectures on conversation, (pp. 3–16). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H., & Jefferson, G. (1995). Lectures on conversation. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1990). The management of a co-operative self during argument: The role of opinions and stories. In A. D. Grimshaw (Ed.), Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic investigations of arguments in conversations (pp. 241–259). Cambridge: Cambridge University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). Narrative as self-portrait: Sociolinguistic construction of identity. Language in Society, 25(2), 167–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suls, J. M. (1977). Gossip as social comparison. Journal of Communication, 27(1), 164–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1994). Gender and Discourse. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1984 [2005]). Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1989 [2007]). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tovares, A. (2006). Public media, private talk: Gossip about a TV show as ‘quotidian hermeneutics.’ Text & Talk, 26(4–5), 463–491. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trinch, S. (2007). The pragmatic use of gender in Latina women’s legal narratives of abuse. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, 14(1), 51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilce, J. (2005). Traditional laments and postmodern regrets: The circulation of discourse in metacultural context. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15(1), 602–617. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yemelianova, G. M. (2014). Islam, national identity and politics in contemporary Kazakhstan. Asian Ethnicity, 15(3), 286–301. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yerkovich, S. (1977). Gossiping as a way of speaking. Journal of Communication, 1(1), 192–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Kaliyeva, Nazeket, Bekkozha Zhylkybekuly, Mainura Buribayeva, Zhakyp Beisenuly, Yedilbek Abdimomynov & Gulnar Mamayeva
2025. A Meta-Thematic Exploration of the Ethnolinguistic Nature of Kazakh Mythological Vocabulary. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies 12:4 ► pp. 86 ff. DOI logo
Capus, Nadja & Melody Bozinova
2023. Impression management in corporate corruption settlements: The storied self of the prosecutorial authority. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 73 ► pp. 100578 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue