Cover not available

Article published In: Real Fictions: Fictionality, factuality and narrative strategies in contemporary storytelling
Edited by Sam Browse, Alison Gibbons and Mari Hatavara
[Narrative Inquiry 29:2] 2019
► pp. 245–267

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Real fictions

Fictionality, factuality and narrative strategies in contemporary storytelling

 | Sheffield Hallam University
 | Sheffield Hallam University
 | Tampere University
Published online: 16 October 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.19025.bro
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • A contemporary culture of post-truth
  • A Brief history of fictionality from within narrative studies: From 1970s–2000
  • Fictionality studies in the twenty-first century
  • The Fact-Fiction distinction and beyond: Factuality, non-fictionality, and fictionalizing strategies
  • Overview of volume
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
References (129)
References
Andersson, G. (2016). The charge against classical and post-classical narratologies’ “Epistemic” approach to literary fiction. In M. Hatavara, M. Hyvärinen, M. Mäkelä, & F. Mäyrä (Eds.), Narrative theory, literature, and new media. Narrative minds and virtual worlds (pp. 50–66). New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andersson, G. & Sandberg, T. (2018). Sameness versus difference in narratology: Two approaches to narrative fiction. Narrative, 26(3), 241–261. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andrews, M. (2014). Narrating moments of political change. In P. Nesbitt-Larking, C. Kinnvall, & T. Capelos (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of global political psychology (pp. 353–368). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ball, J. (2017). Post-truth: How bullshit conquered the world. London: Biteback Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Banfield, A. (1982). Unspeakable sentences: Narration and representation in the language of fiction. Abingdon/New York: Routledge & Kenan Paul.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bareis, J. A. & Nordrum, L. (2015). How to make believe: The fictional truth of representational arts. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bareis, J. A. (2008). The role of fictionality in narrative theory. In L-Å. Skalin (Ed.), Narrativity, fictionality, and literariness: The narrative turn and the study of literary fiction (pp. 155–175). Örebro Studies in Literary History and Criticism 7, Örebro University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, A. (2019). ‘Digital fictionality: Possible worlds theory, ontology, and hyperlinks’. In A. Bell & M.-L. Ryan (Eds.), Possible worlds theory and contemporary narratology (pp. 249–271). Lincoln/Nebraska: Nebraska University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booth, W. C. (1983). The rhetoric of fiction (2nd ed.). London: Penguin Books. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Browse, S. (2017). Between truth, sincerity and satire. In R. van den Akker, A. Gibbons, & T. Vermeulen (Eds.), Metamodernism: Historicity, affect and depth after postmodernism (pp. 167–182). New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(in press). Straight talking honest politics: rhetorical style and ethos in the mediated politics of metamodernity. In H. Ringrow & S. Pihlaja (Eds.), Contemporary media stylistics. London: Bloomsbury.
Bruss, E. (1976). Autobiographical acts: The changing situation of a literary genre. Baltimore, MA/London: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohn, D. (1978). Transparent minds. Narrative modes for presenting consciousness in fiction. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1990). Signposts of fictionality: A narratological perspective. Poetics Today, 11(4), 775–804. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). The distinction of fiction. Baltimore/London: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colbert, S. (2006, April 28). Stephen Colbert roasts Bush at Whitehouse correspondent’s dinner. [Video file.] Retrieved from [URL]
Currie, G. (1990). The nature of fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Narrative and narrators: A philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dawson, Paul. (2015). Ten thesis against fictionality. Narrative, 23(1), 74–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
D’Ancona, M. (2017). Post-truth: The new war on truth and how to fight back. London: Ebury Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davis, E. (2017). Post-truth: Peak bullshit – and what we can do about it. London: Little, Brown.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doležel, L. (1976). Narrative semantics. PTL, 11, 129–151.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1980). Truth and authenticity in narrative. Poetics Today, 1(3), 7–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1988). Mimesis and possible worlds. Poetics Today, 9(3), 475–496. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). Possible worlds of fiction and history. New Literary History, 29(4), 785–809. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). Heterocosmica: Fiction and possible worlds. Baltimore, MA: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2000). New labour, new language? London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Federman, R. (1981 [1975]). Surfiction – Four propositions in form of an introduction. In R. Federman (Ed.) Surfiction: Fiction now and tomorrow (2nd ed.). Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Felski, R. (2008). Uses of literature. Malden, MA/Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fetterley, J. (1978). The Resisting reader. A feminist approach to American fiction. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fish, W. (2016). “‘Post-truth’ politics and illusory democracy”. Psychotherapy and Politics International, 14(3), 211–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flaxman, S., Sharad, G. & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 298–320. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fludernik, M. (1993). The fictions of language and the languages of fiction. The linguistic representation of speech and consciousness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). Towards a “natural” narratology. London/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Genres, text types, or discourse modes? Narrative modalities and generic categorization. Style, 34(2), 274–292.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Fiction vs. non-fiction: Narratological differentiations. In J. Helbig (Ed.), Erzählen und Erzähltheorie im 20. Jahrhundert. Festschrift für Wilhelm Füger (pp. 85–103). Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). The fiction of the rise of fictionality. Poetics Today, 39(1), 67–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fludernik, M. & Nielsen, H. S. (in press). Fictionality Studies from Europe: An Introduction. Arcadia.
Foucault, M. (1984). Truth and power. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault Reader (pp. 51–75). London: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frus, P. (1994). The politics and poetics of journalistic narrative. The timely and the timeless. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallagher, C. (2006). The rise of fictionality. In F. Moretti (Ed.), The Novel, Volume 1: History, Geography, and Culture (pp. 336–363). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). What would Napolean do? Historical, fictional, and counterfactual characters. New Literary History, 42(2), 315–336. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gavins, J. (2007). Text world theory: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Genette, G. (1990). Fictional narrative, factual narrative. Poetics Today, 2(4), 755–774. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993). Fiction & diction, (C. Porter, trans.). Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbons, A. (2014). Fictionality and ontology. In P. Stockwell & S. Whiteley (Eds.) The Cambridge handbook of stylistics (pp. 408–423). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Autonarration, I, and odd address in Ben Lerner’s autofictional novel 10:04 . In A. Gibbons & A. Macrae (Eds.), Pronouns in literature: Positions and perspectives in language (pp. 75–96). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gorman, D. (2005). Fiction, theories of. In D. Herman, M. Jahn, & M.-L. Ryan (Eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory (pp. 163–167). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grishakova, M. (2008). Literariness, fictionality, and the theory of possible worlds. In L.-Å. Skalin (Ed.), Narrativity, fictionality, and literariness: The narrative turn and the study of literary fiction (pp. 57–76). Örebro Studies in Literary History and Criticism 7, Örebro University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamburger, K. (1973). The logic of literature. Bloomington/London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hannan, J. (2018). Trolling ourselves to death? Social media and post-truth politics. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 214–226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansen, P. K. (2005). When fact becomes fiction. On extra-textual unreliable narration. In L.-Å. Skalin (Ed.), Fact and fiction in narrative. An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 283–307). Örebro Studies in Literary History and Criticism 4, Örebro University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harshaw (Hrushovski), B. (1984). Fictionality and frames of reference: Remarks on a theoretical framework. Poetics Today, 5(2), 227–251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harsin, J. (2015). ‘Regimes of posttruth, post politics and attention economics’. Communication, Culture and Critique, 81, 327–333. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Post-truth populism: The French anti-gender theory movement and cross-cultural similarities. Communication, culture and Critique, 111, 35–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hatavara, M. & Mildorf, J. (2017a). Hybrid fictionality and vicarious narrative experience. Narrative, 25(1), 65–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017b). Fictionality, narrative modes, and vicarious storytelling. Style, 51(3), 392–408.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herman, D. (2002). Story logic: Problems and possibilities of narrative. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Introduction. In D. Herman (Ed.), The Emergence of mind. Representations of consciousness in narrative discourse in English (pp. 1–42). Lincoln/London: The University of Nebraska Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyvönen, A-E. (2018). Careless speech: Conceptualizing post-truth politics. New Perspectives, 26(3), 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iser, W. (1993). The fictive and the imaginary: Charting literary anthropology. Baltimore, MA/ London: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ishiguro, K. (2015). The Buried Giant. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iversen, S. & Nielsen, H. S. (2016). The politics of fictionality in documentary form: The act of killing and The ambassador . European Journal of English Studies, 20(3), 249–262. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kelly Garrett, R. (2009). Echo chambers online? Politically motivated selective exposure among internet users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 265–285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keyes, R. (2004). The post-truth era: Dishonesty and deception in contemporary life. New York: St Martins Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klastrup, L. & Tosca, S. (2004). Transmedial worlds – Rethinking cyberworld design. Proceedings of the 2004 International Conference on Cyberworlds (2004), 409–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klauk, T. & Köppe, T. (2014). Fiktonalität: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, N. (2017). No is not Enough. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuhn, M. & Thon, J.-N. (2017). Transmedial narratology: Current approaches. Narrative, 25(3), 253–255. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kukkonen, K. & Nielsen, H. S. (2018). Fictionality: Cognition and exceptionality. Poetics Today 39(3), 473–494. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lamarque, P. & Olsen, S. H. (1994). Truth, fiction, and literature. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lejeune, P. (1989). On autobiography, (K. Leary, trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H. & Cook, J. (2017). Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 61, 353–369. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1983). Truth in fiction. Philosophy Papers, Volume 11. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Löschnigg, M. (1999). Narratological categories and the (non-)distinction between factual and fictional narratives. In J. Pier (Ed.), Recent trends in narratological research (pp. 31–48), Tours: Presses Universitaires François-Rabelais. Retrieved from [URL].
Lubbock, P. (1921). The craft of fiction. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mair, J. (2017). Post-truth anthropology. Anthropology Today, 33(3), 3–4. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McHale, B. (1978). Free indirect discourse: A survey of recent accounts. Poetics and Theory of Literature, 31, 249–287.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Afterword: A new normal? In M. Hatavara, M. Hyvärinen, M. Mäkelä, & F. Mäyrä (Eds.), Narrative Theory, Literature, and New Media. Narrative Minds and Virtual Worlds (pp. 295–304). New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McIntyre, L. (2018). Post-truth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Munoz, J. (2017). Somatic markers, rhetoric and post-truth. Frontiers in psychology. 81, article 1273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nielsen, H. S. (2010). Natural authors, unnatural narration. In J. Alber & M. Fludernik (Eds.), Postclassical narratology: Approaches and analyses. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Unnatural Narratology, Impersonal Voices, Real Authors, and Non-Communicative Narration. In J. Alber and R. Heinze (Eds.), Unnatural Narratives, Unnatural Narratology (pp. 71–88). Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nielsen, H. S., Phelan, J., & Walsh, R. (2015). Ten theses about fictionality. Narrative, 23(1), 61–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pariser, E. (2011). Filter bubbles: What the internet is hiding from you. London: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pavel, T. (1975). ‘Possible worlds in literary semantics’. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 34(2), 165–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1986). Fictional worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pearce, M. (2001). “Getting behind the image”: personality politics in a Labour Party election broadcast. Language and Literature, 10(3), 211–220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Phelan, J. (2005). Living to tell about it: A rhetoric and ethics of character narration. Ithaca/ London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Local fictionality within global non-fiction: Roz Chast’s Why can’t we talk about something more pleasant? . Enthymema, 161, 19–31.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Fictionality. a/b: Auto/Biography Studies, 32(2), 235–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Fictionality, audiences, and character: A rhetorical alternative to Catherine Gallagher’s “Rise of fictionality”. Poetics Today, 39(1), 113–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Phelan, J. & Nielsen, H. S. (2017). Why There Are No One-to-One Correspondences among Fictionality, Narrative, and Techniques: A Response to Mari Hatavara and Jarmila Mildorf. Narrative, 25(1), 83–91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polletta, F., & Lee, J. (2006). Is telling stories good for democracy? Rhetoric in public deliberation after 9/11. American Sociological Review, 71(5), 699–723. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prince, G. (1991). Narratology, narrative, and meaning. (A. Noble, trans.). Poetics Today, 12(3), 543–552. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarisation. Annual Review of Political Science, 161, 101–127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Punday, D. (2010). Five Strands of Fictionality: The Institutional Construction of Contemporary American Fiction. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ronen, R. (1994). Possible worlds in literary theory. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roscoe, J. & Hight, C. (2001). Faking it: Mock-documentary and the subversion of factuality. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ryan, M.-L. (1980). Fiction, non-factuals, and the principle of minimal departure. Poetics, 9(4), 403–422. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1985). The modal structure of narrative universes. Poetics, 6(4), 717–755. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991). Possible worlds, artificial intelligence and narrative theory. Bloomington/ Indiapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Avatars of story. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Transfictionality across media. In J. Pier & J. Á. García Landa (Eds.), Theorizing Narrativity (pp. 387–417). Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schaeffer, J.-M. (2010). Why fiction? (D. Cohn, trans.). Lincoln, NE/London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Fictional vs. factual narration. In P. Hühn, J. C. Meister, J. Pier, & W. Schmid (Eds.), The living handbook of narratology. Hamburg: Hamburg University. Retrieved from [URL]
Searle, J. R. (1975). The logical status of fictional discourse. New Literary History, 6(2), 319–332. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skalin, L-Å. (2008). “Telling a story”. Reflections on fictional and non-fictional narratives. In L.-Å. Skalin (Ed.), Narrativity, fictionality, and literariness: The narrative turn and the study of literary fiction (pp. 201–260). Örebro Studies in Literary History and Criticism 7, Örebro University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance, communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spolsky, E. (2015). The contracts of fiction: Cognition, culture, community. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tallis, B. (2016). Living in post-truth: Power/knowledge/responsibility. New Perspectives, 24(1), 7–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tompkins, J. P. (1980). (Ed.) Reader-response criticism: From formalism to post-structuralism. Baltimore, MA/London: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van den Akker, R., Gibbons, A., & Vermeulen, T. (2017). (Eds.), Metamodernism: Historicity, affect, and depth after postmodernism. London: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vermeulen, T. (2015). The New “Depthiness”. E.Flux 611. Retrieved from [URL]
Watt, I. (2001). The rise of the novel. Studies in Defoe, Richardson and Fielding. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walsh, R. (2005). The pragmatics of narrative fictionality. In J. Phelan & P. J. Rabinowitz (Eds.), A Companion to Narrative Theory (pp. 150–164). Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). The rhetoric of fictionality. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walton, K. (1990). Mimesis as make believe: On the foundations of the representational arts. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Werth, P. (1999). Text worlds: Representing conceptual space in discourse. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, H. (1978). Tropics of discourse. Essays in cultural criticism. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilderkamp, A., van Montfoort, I. & van Ruiswijk, W. (1980). Fictionality and convention. Poetics, 9(5–6), 547–567. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zetterberg Gjerlevsen, S. (2016a). A novel history of fictionality. Narrative, 24(2), 174–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016b). Fictionality. In P. Hühn et al. (Eds.), The living handbook of narratology, Hamburg: Hamburg University. Retrieved from [URL]
(2017). How to do things with fictionality: Approaching fictionality through speech act theory. In S. S. Grumsen, P. K. Hansen, R. A. Kraglund, & H. S. Nielsen (Eds.), Expectations: Reader assumptions and author intentions in narrative discourse (pp. 73–96). Odense: Medusa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). The threshold of fiction. Poetics Today, 39(1), 93–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zipfel, F. (2014). Fiction across media: Toward a transmedial concept of fictionality. In M.-L. Ryan & J.-N. Thon (Eds.), Storyworlds across Media: Towards a Media-Conscious Narratology (pp. 103–125). Lincoln, NE/London: University of Nebraska Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (14)

Cited by 14 other publications

Can, Ali Selcuk, Yuksel Ekinci & Setenay Dilek-Fidler
2025. Fantasy or reality? Unveiling the power of realistic narratives in tourism social media advertising. Tourism Management 106 ► pp. 104998 ff. DOI logo
Moorthy, P. & D. Kumar
2025. A conceptual study of menstruation taboos and intangible pain. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health 33 ► pp. 101178 ff. DOI logo
van de Ven, Inge
2025. Trust in Stories: A Reader Response Study of (Un)Reliability in Akutagawa’s “In a Grove”. Literature 5:4 ► pp. 24 ff. DOI logo
Girão, Mel, Hélio Arthur Reis Irigaray & Fabricio Stocker
2023. Fake news e storytelling: dois lados da mesma moeda ou duas moedas com lados iguais?. Cadernos EBAPE.BR 21:1 DOI logo
Girão, Mel, Hélio Arthur Reis Irigaray & Fabricio Stocker
2023. Fake news and storytelling: two sides of the same coin or two equal coins?. Cadernos EBAPE.BR 21:1 DOI logo
Scherr, Alexander
2023. The ‘Struggle for the Narrative’: Cooperation and Conflict in Tiger King’s Intermedial Universe. Discourses on Culture 19:1 ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Scherr, Alexander
2023. Laissez-Faire Storytelling: Fictionality, Post-Factuality, and the Filmic Voice in Joshua Oppenheimer’s Documentary The Act of Killing (2012). Style 57:3 ► pp. 296 ff. DOI logo
Hatavara, Mari, Jussi Kurunmäki & Mykola Andrushchenko
2022. Telling and retelling a historical event: the collapse of the Soviet Union in Finnish parliamentary talk. Scandinavian Journal of History 47:1 ► pp. 106 ff. DOI logo
Shang, Biwu
2022. Narrative theory across borders. Neohelicon 49:1 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Tang, Yili
2022. The rhetoric of factuality and fictionality in Julian Barnes’s the noise of Time and the Man in the Red Coat. Neohelicon 49:1 ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Biar, Liana de Andrade, Naomi Orton & Liliana Cabral Bastos
2021. Tales from the South. Narrative Inquiry 31:1 ► pp. 126 ff. DOI logo
Gibbons, Alison
2021.  “Why do you insist that Alana is not real?”. In Style and Reader Response [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 36], ► pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Macgilchrist, Felicitas
2021. When discourse analysts tell stories: what do we ‘do’ when we use narrative as a resource to critically analyse discourse?. Critical Discourse Studies 18:3 ► pp. 387 ff. DOI logo
Statham, Simon
2020. The year’s work in stylistics 2019. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 29:4 ► pp. 454 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue