Cover not available

Article published In: Real Fictions: Fictionality, factuality and narrative strategies in contemporary storytelling
Edited by Sam Browse, Alison Gibbons and Mari Hatavara
[Narrative Inquiry 29:2] 2019
► pp. 313–332

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Narrative warfare

The ‘careless’ reinterpretation of literary canon in online antifeminism

 | Tampere University
Published online: 16 October 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.19019.nur
Abstract
This article studies the use of literature and narrative strategies of online antifeminist movements. These movements classified under the umbrella term the manosphere, wage ideological narrative warfare to endorse a misogynistic worldview. The case at hand concentrates on the radical faction of neomasculinity and its attempts to reinterpret the Western canon of literature. I propose that neomasculine readings of novels such as Vladimir Nabokov’s Lolita are careless interpretations that ground themselves on specific traits of the texts while ignoring others. These readings attempt to evoke a sense of recognition in the community that believes in an alleged feminist conspiracy against men. Careless interpretations borrow from post-truth rhetoric and the feminist literary theory tradition of reading against the grain. When confronted over their controversial views, neomasculine figures renarrativize readings to benefit the promotion of neomasculine perspectives. This strategic use of literature is part of the narrative warfare discussed in detail.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • The manosphere’s online ecology and antifeminist narrative warfare
  • Careless interpretations of neomasculine readings
  • From the renarrativization of misogyny to problems of reading
  • Conclusion – Real antifeminist fictions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (38)
References
About. (2019). Return of Kings. [Blog post] Retrieved from [URL]
Allan, J. A. (2016). Phallic affect, or why men’s rights activists have feelings. Men and Masculinities, 19(1), 22–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anna Karenina is one of the earliest examples of red pill truth. (2014a, May 13). Return of Kings. [Blog post] Retrieved from [URL]
Arendt, H. (2006). Between past and future: Eight exercises in political thought. London: Penguin. (Original work published 1961.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culler, J. (1975). Structuralist poetics: Structuralism, linguistics and the study of literature. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Fina, A., & Toscano Gore, B. (2017). Online retellings and the viral transformation of a Twitter breakup story. Narrative Inquiry, 27(2), 235–260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dostoyevsky and the narcissistic roots of insecurity. (2015, February 5). Return of Kings. [Blog post] Retrieved from [URL]
Felski, R. (2003). Literature after feminism. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Uses of literature. Malden, MA/Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fetterley, J. (1978). The resisting reader. A feminist approach to American fiction. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ging, D. (2017). Alphas, betas, and incels: Theorizing the masculinities of the manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 1–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ging, D., & Siapera, E. (2018). Special issue on online misogyny. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 515–524. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gotell, L., & Dutton, E. (2016). Sexual violence in the ‘manosphere’: Antifeminist men’s rights discourses on rape. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 5(2), 65–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guyer, S. (2013). The ends of misreading: Propaganda, democracy, literature. In J. Auerbach & E. Castronovo (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of propaganda studies (pp. 366–377). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyvönen, A.-E. (2018). Careless speech: Conceptualizing post-truth politics. New Perspectives, 26(3), 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
9 important lessons from a Clockwork Orange. (2017, November 27). Return of Kings. [Blog post] Retrieved from [URL]
8 important lessons from the classic novel Lolita. (2017, November 7). Return of Kings. [Blog post] Retrieved from [URL]
Jane, E. (2017). Systemic misogyny exposed: Translating rapeglish from the manosphere with a random rape threat generator. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 1–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kelly, A. (2017). The alt-right: Reactionary rehabilitation for white masculinity. Soundings: A Journal of Politics and Culture, 661, 68–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marwick, A. E., & Lewis, R. (2017). Media manipulation and disinformation online. Data & Society Research Institute.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marwick, A. E., & Caplan, R. (2018). Drinking male tears: Language, the manosphere, and networked harassment. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 543–559. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Millett, K. (1970). Sexual politics. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nagle, A. (2017). Kill all normies. Online culture wars from 4chan and Tumblr to Trump and the alt-right. Winchester: Zero Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nurminen, M. (2020). “The big bang of chaotic masculine disruption”: A critical narrative analysis of radical masculinity movement’s counter-narrative strategies. In K. Lueg & M. Lundholt (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of counter-narratives. London/New York: Routledge. Manuscript submitted for publication. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Neill, R. (2018). Seduction. Men, masculinity and mediated intimacy. Medford, MA: Polity.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Presser, L. (2018). Inside story: How narratives drive mass harm. Oakland, CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salmon, C. (2010). Storytelling: Bewitching the modern mind. (D. Macey, Trans.). London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saresma, T. (2017). Fictitious memories of the nostalgic past: Racialised gender melancholy in the manosphere. In M. Mikula (Ed.), Remembering home in a time of mobility: Memory, nostalgia and melancholy (pp. 151–165). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suiter, J. (2016). Post-truth politics. Political Insight, 7(3), 25–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valizadeh, D. (2014, May 28). Elliot Rodger is the first male feminist mass murderer. Return of Kings. [Blog post] Retrieved from [URL]
(2015a, February 16). How to stop rape. Roosh V. [Blog post] Retrieved from [URL]
(2015b, June 8). Narrative warfare. Roosh V. [Blog post] Retrieved from [URL]
Warhol-Down, R., & Price Herndl, D. (Eds.) (2009). Feminisms redux: An anthology of literary theory and criticism. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wendling, M. (2019, March 18). Christchurch shootings: The rising new threat of far-right violence. BBC. Retrieved from [URL]
Zuckerberg, D. (2018). Not all dead white men. Classics and misogyny in digital age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Coufal, Linda, Tuija Saresma & Heidi Kosonen
2025. Fight with words: misogynist extremism on an incel discussion forum. NORMA 20:3 ► pp. 184 ff. DOI logo
Iñigo, Anna
2025. Navigating the Manosphere: A Scoping Review of Research on Masculinist and Misogynist Online Spaces. The Journal of Men’s Studies DOI logo
Mäkelä, Maria
2025. From Telling the Story to Telling the Structure: Feminist and LGBTQ+ Narratives in Social Media. In The Palgrave Handbook of Feminist, Queer and Trans* Narrative Studies, ► pp. 521 ff. DOI logo
Nurminen, Matias
2022. From Swallowing the Red Pill to Failing to Build the Wall: Allusive Cognitive Metaphors in Advocating Political and Extremist Views. Poetics Today 43:2 ► pp. 309 ff. DOI logo
Orton, Naomi
2021. “MYTHS”, “TRUTHS” AND THE ROLE OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIETY. Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada 60:2 ► pp. 455 ff. DOI logo
Saresma, Tuija, Sanna Karkulehto & Piia Varis
2021. Gendered Violence Online: Hate Speech as an Intersection of Misogyny and Racism. In Violence, Gender and Affect, ► pp. 221 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue