Article published In: Real Fictions: Fictionality, factuality and narrative strategies in contemporary storytelling
Edited by Sam Browse, Alison Gibbons and Mari Hatavara
[Narrative Inquiry 29:2] 2019
► pp. 333–351
“I can tell the difference between fiction and reality”
Cross-fictionality and Mind-style in political rhetoric
Published online: 16 October 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.19018.bro
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.19018.bro
Abstract
This article approaches fictionality as a set of semiotic strategies prototypically associated with fictional
forms of storytelling ( (2017b). Fictionality, narrative modes, and vicarious storytelling. Style, 51(3), 391–408.). Whilst these strategies are
strongly associated with fiction, they might also be used in non-fictional and ontologically ambivalent contexts to create
‘cross-fictional’ rhetorical effects. We focus on the representation of thought and consciousness. Using the concept of ‘mind
style’ (Fowler, R. (1977). Linguistics and the novel. London: Methuen., (1996). Linguistic criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.; Leech, G. & Short, M. (1981). Style in fiction. Harlow: Pearson.; (2007). Mind style twenty five years on. Style, 41(2), 153–173.), we
investigate the linguistic representation of the internal monologue of British Prime Minister, Theresa May, in a satirical
newspaper article. The stylistic analysis of the PM’s mind style facilitates an account of the elaborate and nuanced mixing of May
and the author’s ideological perspectives throughout the piece. We argue that this cross-fictional, stylistic approach better
accounts for the satirical effects of fictionality in the text than those placing a premium on authorial intention and the
invented nature of the narrative discourse.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Fictionality and narratology
- Fictionality and mind style
- Fictionality and mind style in political punditry
- Constructing May’s mind style
- Thoughts embedded in thoughts
- Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
References
References (58)
Andersson, G. & Sandberg, T. (2018). Sameness versus difference in narratology: Two approaches to narrative fiction. Narrative, 26(3), 241–261.
Black, E. (1993). Metaphor, simile and cognition in Golding’s The Inheritors
. Language & Literature, 2(1), 37–48.
Bockting, I. (1994). Mind style as an interdisciplinary approach to characterisation in Faulkner. Language & Literature, 3(3), pp. 157–174.
Browse, S. (2018a). From functional to cognitive grammar in stylistic analysis of Golding’s The Inheritors
. Journal of Literary Semantics, 47(2), 121–146.
(2018b). Reading political minds: “Backstage” politics in audience reception. In M. Kranert & G. Horan (eds) ‘Doing politics’: Discursivity, performativity and mediation in political discourse, (pp. 333–359), Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chatman, S. (1980). Story and discourse. Narrative structure in fiction and film. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.
(1990). Coming to terms: The rhetoric of narrative in fiction and film. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.
Clark, B. (2009). Salient inferences: Pragmatics and The Inheritors
. Language & Literature, 18(2), 173–212.
Clark, T. (2015). Jeremy Corbyn’s speech: what he said and what he meant. The Guardian [online]. <[URL]> (Accessed 21st August, 2019)
Cohn, D. (1978). Transparent minds. Narrative modes for presenting consciousness in fiction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
(2003). Natural narratology and cognitive parameters. In D. Herman (ed). Narrative theory and the cognitive sciences (pp. 243–267), Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Genette, G. (1988). Narrative discourse revisited. Translated by J. E. Lewin. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.
Giovanelli, M. (2018). ‘Something happened, something bad’: Blackouts, uncertainties and event construal in The Girl on the Train
. Language & Literature, 27(1), 38–51.
Grishakova, M. (2008). Literariness, fictionality, and the theory of possible worlds. In L.Å. Skalin (Ed.) Narrativity, fictionality, and literariness: The narrative turn and the study of literary fiction (pp. 57–76), Örebro Studies in Literary History and Criticism 7, Örebro University.
(2013). Complexity, Hybridity, and Comparative Literature. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 15(7).
Halliday, M. A. K. (1971). Linguistic function & literary style: An inquiry into the language of William Golding’s The Inheritors
. In. Chatman (ed.) Literary Style: A Symposium (pp. 330–368), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harrison, C. (2017). ‘Finding Elizabeth: Construing memory in Elizabeth Is Missing by Emma Healey’. Journal of Literary Semantics, 46(2), 131–151.
Hatavara, M. (2016). Documenting everyday life: Mind representation in the web exhibition ‘A Finnish winter day.’ In M. Hatavara, M. Hyvärinen, M. Mäkelä, & F. Mäyrä (Eds.) Narrative Theory, Literature, and New Media: Narrative Minds and Virtual Worlds, (pp. 278–294), London: Routledge.
Hatavara, M. & Mildorf, J. (2017a). Hybrid fictionality and vicarious narrative experience. Narrative, 25(1), 65–82.
Herman, D. (2011). Introduction. In David Herman (Ed.) The emergence of mind. Representations of consciousness in narrative discourse in English (pp. 1–42), Lincoln & London: The University of Nebraska Press.
Hoover, D. (1999). Language & style in The Inheritors. Lanham, MD & Oxford: University Press of America.
Ji, Y. & Shen, D. (2004). Transitivity and mental transformation: Sheila Watson’s The Double Hook
. Language and Literature, 13(4), 335–348.
Karttunen, L. (2008). A sociostylistic perspective on negatives and the disnarrated: Lahiri, Roy, Rushdie. Partial Answers, 6(2), 419–441.
Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol I. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
(1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol II. Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
McHale, B. (1978). Free indirect discourse: A survey of recent accounts. Poetics and Theory of Literature, 31, 249–287.
Nahajec, L. (2009). Negation and the creation of implicit meaning in poetry. Language & Literature, 18(2), 109–127.
Nielsen, H. S., Phelan, J., & Walsh, R. (2015). Ten theses about fictionality. Narrative, 23(1), 61–73.
Nuttall, L. (2015). Attributing minds to vampires in Richard Matheson’s I am Legend
. Language and Literature, 24(1), 23–39.
Nuyts, J. (2006). Modality: Overview and linguistic issues. In W. Frawley (ed.) The Expression of Modality, (pp. 1–26), Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Palmer, A. (2005). Thought and consciousness representation (literature). In David Herman, Manfred Jahn & Marie-Laure Ryan (Eds.) Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory (pp. 602–606), London & New York: Routledge.
Perkins, A. (2016). Theresa May’s speech: what she said and what she meant. The Guardian [online]. <[URL]> (Accessed: 21st August, 2019)
Searle, J. R. (1975). The logical status of fictional discourse. New Literary History, 6(2), 319–332.
Semino, E. (2002). A cognitive stylistic approach to mind style in narrative fiction. In E. Semino & J. Culpeper (eds) Cognitive Stylistics, (pp. 95–122), Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2014). Pragmatic failure, mind style and characterisation in fiction about autism. Language & Literature, 23(2), 141–158.
Semino, E. & Swindlehurst, K. (1996). Metaphor and mind style in Ken Kesey’s One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest
. Style, 30(1), 143–166.
(2003). On the discourse of satire. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Dong, Xueying & Guizhen Liu
Orton, Naomi & Liana Biar
Biar, Liana de Andrade, Naomi Orton & Liliana Cabral Bastos
Orton, Naomi
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
