Article published In: Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 30:2 (2020) ► pp.381–403
Grammatical uniformity of tense and aspect
Encoding narrator’s perspective and vantage point through Tense Shift
Published online: 19 May 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.19005.cha
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.19005.cha
Abstract
This paper explores the pragmatic effects of Tense Shift in an Urdu narrative. A linguistic analysis of the semantic and pragmatic effects of Tense Shift is proposed. A key claim of this analysis is that the mechanisms of Tense Shift exist in sentence-level grammar in Urdu. The analysis seeks to provide an explanation for some of the properties of Tense Shift that have been pointed out in previous studies of Tense Shift in other languages. The paper discusses as well the extent to which this analysis is expected to apply to narratives in languages other than Urdu.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Background
- Previous analyses
- The markedness approach (Fleischman 1990)
- New analytical theory: Motivations and importance
- New approach: Grammatical Uniformity of Tense and Aspect (GUTA)
- Theoretical background of GUTA
- Temporal relations at sentence level
- Temporal primitives: From sentences to narrative discourse
- Tense and aspect in Urdu narrative and application of GUTA to Urdu examples
- Passage 1 Umrao Jan Ada (1987, p. 39) (Urdu)
- Passage 2 Umrao Jan Ada (1987, p. 81)
- Present tense – progressive aspect
- Present tense – perfect aspect
- Past tense – perfective aspect
- Conclusions
- Evidence based claims
- Linguistic claims: Tense – narrator’s location and aspect – narrator’s perception
- Scope of GUTA across languages and narrative discourses
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (23)
Andrews, E. (2012). Markedness. In R. I. Binnick (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect (pp. 212–236). New York: Oxford University Press.
Bal, M. (1985). Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Barthes, R. (1975). An Introduction to the Structural Analysis of Narrative. (L. Duisit, Trans.). New Literary History: A Journal of Theory and Interpretation, 6(2), 237–72.
Carruthers, J. (2012). Discourse and Text. In R. I. Binnick (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect (pp. 306–334). New York: Oxford University Press.
Demirdache, H., & Uribe-Etxebarria, M. (2000). The Primitives of Temporal Relations. In R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 157–186). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Fleischman, S. (1990). Tense and Narrativity from Medieval Performance to Modern Fiction. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Fludernik, M. (1991). The Historical Present Tense Yet Again: Tense Switching and Narrative Dynamics in Oral and Quasi-Oral Storytelling. Text, 11(3), 365–98.
(2003). Chronology, time, tense and experientiality in narrative. Language and Literature, 12(2), 117–134.
(2012). Narratology and Literary Linguistics. In R. I. Binnick (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect (pp. 75–101). New York: Oxford University Press.
Genette, G. (1980). Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
Hopper, P. J. (1979). Aspect and Foregrounding in Discourse. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics, Volume 12 Discourse and Syntax (pp. 213–241). London: Academic Press.
Hornstein, N. (1990). As Time Goes By: Tense and Universal Grammar. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 119–165.
Labov, W. (1973). Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on Verbal and Visual Arts (pp. 12–44). Seattle and London: University of Washington Press.
Norrick, N. (2007). Conversational storytelling. In D. Herman (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Narrative (pp. 127–141). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thornborrow, J. (2000). The Construction of Conflicting Accounts in Public Participation TV. Language in Society, 291, 357–77.