Article published In: Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 19:2 (2009) ► pp.199–218
We have a place in a long story
Empowered narratives and the construction of communities: The case of US presidential debates
Published online: 16 December 2009
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.19.2.01she
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.19.2.01she
The article discusses the relevance of narrative theory to the study of politics. It claims that the structure of narratives creates a sense of continuity, which is central to the construction of community. Following this claim, the article demonstrates the potential value of combining the study of political narratives with a study of political actions of empowering those who construct them. It presents a study of the closing statements of US presidential debates as a source of narratives related by politicians, and voting records as an indicator of the power given by the people to those politicians. This study explores the correlation between narrative structure as a textual means of constructing continuity and the power given, by the public, to politicians who produce the narratives. It shows that this correlation tends to be higher in counties located in the eastern US and in counties that tend to be more Republican. This finding, the article suggests, indicates the establishment of different Interpretive Communities in the US.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Creedon, Pamela J. & Laura A. Wackwitz
Lavi, Liron
Dobkiewicz, Patryk
Feng, Dezheng (William) & Shuo Zhang
Ish-Shalom, Piki
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
