Article published In: Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 19:1 (2009) ► pp.69–90
A good story or a good identity?
The reportability of stories interfering with the construction of a morally acceptable identity
Published online: 25 September 2009
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.19.1.05van
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.19.1.05van
Big stories are typically characterized by a high degree of reflexivity, which results in the construction of a fairly coherent — or even “rehearsed” — identity that is acceptable from a contemporary viewpoint. This article focuses on the life story of a former SS Leibstandarte soldier elicited by means of an interview. Most of the analysis confirms this idea of the construction of a “rehearsed” self, since the narrator consistently presents himself as a peaceful man who did not agree with Hitler’s regime. However, although rarely, the interviewee self-initiates stories that do not perfectly match this identity construction. These stories all contain highly reportable events, in which most attention is paid to enhancing credibility instead of making them conform to the prevalent identity construction. This demonstrates that also in big stories, the activity of narrating takes place in the here and now, thus making an audience-oriented criterion such as reportability so important that contradictions of this “rehearsed” identity may occur.
Keywords: identity construction, reflexivity, reportability, Second World War, big story
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Fodor, Mónika & Réka Lugossy
Thole, Werner & Bernd Dollinger
Jaspaert, Koen & Sara Gysen
Van De Mieroop, Dorien & Jonathan Clifton
Hibbert, Julia F., Janet E. Dickinson, Stefan Gössling & Susanna Curtin
Van De Mieroop, Dorien & Mathias Pagnaer
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
