Cover not available

Article published In: Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 30:2 (2020) ► pp.427–450

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Storytelling and stance-taking in group interaction

 | Sheffield Hallam University
Published online: 19 May 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.18078.pep
Abstract
This paper looks at two highly prevalent actions in naturally-occurring talk: stance-taking and storytelling. Stance-taking and storytelling have been shown to co-occur often (e.g. Siromaa, M. (2012). Resonance in conversational second stories: a dialogic resource for stance taking. Text and Talk, 32(4), 525–545. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar), and this is especially the case in reading group talk, a discursive environment in which speakers are engaged in the joint enterprise of assessing the meaning and quality of a shared object: a written narrative text (e.g. a novel). Insights from conversation analysis and dialogic syntax are used to analyse interactional data from several reading group meetings, with a focus on the types of storytelling that are found in this talk, the relationship between the various stories told in sequence in the talk – including the relationship between the written narrative text and the spoken narratives, and the ways in which stance-taking and storytelling are intertwined.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Background
    • Social reading and reading groups
    • Storytelling and stance
  • Analysis
    • Retelling the written text
    • Written text as “first story”
    • Integrated analysis
  • Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (49)
References
Adichie, C. N. (2013). Americanah. New York: A. A. Knopf.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allington, D., & Swann, J. (2009). Researching literary reading as social practice. Language and Literature, 18(3), 219–230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anward, J. (2004). Lexeme recycled. How categories emerge from interaction. Logos and Language, 5(2), 31–46.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benwell, B. (2009). ‘A pathetic and racist and awful character’: ethnomethodological approaches to the reception of diasporic fiction. Language and Literature, 18(3), 300–315. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Common-sense anti-racism in book group talk: the role of reported speech. Discourse & Society, 23(4), 356–376. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolden, G. B., & Mandelbaum, J. (2017). The use of conversational co-remembering to corroborate contentious claims. Discourse Studies, 19(1), 3–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chaucer, G. (2008). The riverside Chaucer (3rd ed.). F. N. Robinson (Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collinson, I. (2009). Everyday readers: reading and popular culture. London: Equinox. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, J. W. (2007). The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (pp. 139–182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 359–410. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, J. W., & Giora, R. (2014). From cognitive-functional linguistics to dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 351–357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. H. (1990). He-Said-She-Said: Talk as social organization among black children. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haddington, P. (2004). Stance taking in news interviews. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 171, 101–142.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartley, J. (2002). The reading groups book: 2002–2003 edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Helisten, M. (2017). Resumptions as multimodal achievements in conversational (story)tellings. Journal of Pragmatics, 112(1), 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1978). Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversation (pp. 219–248). New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). On the poetics of ordinary talk. Text and Performance Quarterly, 16(1), 1–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kingsolver, B. (2012). Flight behaviour. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city: studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Long, E. (1992). Textual interpretation as collective action. In J. Boyrain (Ed.), The Ethnography of Reading (pp. 180–211). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Book clubs: women and the uses of reading in everyday life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Literature as a spur to collective action: the diverse perspectives of nineteenth and twentieth-century reading groups. Poetics Today, 25(2), 335–359. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mills, M. (1998). The restraint of beasts. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nir, B., Dori-Hacohen, G., & Maschler, Y. (2013). Formulations on Israeli talk radio: from actions and sequences to stance via dialogic syntax. Discourse Studies, 16(4), 534–571. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nissi, R. (2013). Decrypting the text: the construction and function of disagreement in Bible study sessions. Text & Talk, 33(6), 771–791. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norrick, N. (2005). Interactional remembering in conversational narrative. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(11), 1819–1844. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Conversational recipe telling. Journal of Pragmatics, 431, 2740–2761. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peplow, D. (2016). Talk about books: a study of reading groups. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peplow, D., Swann, J., Trimarco, P., & Whiteley, S. (2016). Reading group discourse: integrating cognitive and sociocultural perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Procter, J., & Benwell, B. (2014). Reading across worlds: transnational book groups and the reception of difference. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radway, J. A. (1987). Reading the romance: women, patriarchy, and popular culture. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997). A feeling for books: the book-of-the-month club, literary taste, and middle-class desire. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riessmann, C. (1993). Narrative analysis. London: SAGE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1974). An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation. In R. Bauman & J. F. Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (pp. 337–353). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1978). Some technical considerations of a dirty joke. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversation (pp. 249–269). New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). Lectures on conversation (Vols. 1–21). G. Jefferson (Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selting, M. (2012). Complaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affect displays. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(4), 387–415. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siromaa, M. (2012). Resonance in conversational second stories: a dialogic resource for stance taking. Text and Talk, 32(4), 525–545. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: when nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(1), 31–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swann, J., & Allington, D. (2009). Reading groups and the language of literary texts: a case study in social reading. Language and Literature, 18(3), 247–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1987). Repetition in conversation: towards a poetics of talk. Language, 63(3), 574–605. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whiteley, S. (2011). Text world theory, real readers and emotional responses to The Remains of the Day. Language and Literature, 20(1), 23–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Ren, Wei & Yufei Li
2024. Sharing second stories in online comforting interactions. Discourse, Context & Media 62 ► pp. 100835 ff. DOI logo
Statham, Simon
2021. The year’s work in stylistics 2020. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 30:4 ► pp. 407 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue