Article published In: Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 29:1 (2019) ► pp.82–98
Stability of hidden stories
Published online: 2 July 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.17080.kun
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.17080.kun
Abstract
We refer to the concept of the hidden story as a story about one’s own life, internalized in the mind and knowable “indirectly”, through a monologue and inference, using linguistic and literary theory tools. The aim of the study was to determine whether the hidden story thus reconstructed would be stable in time. A twenty-one-year-old woman was asked to deliver a ten-minute monologue on her upbringing. After two years the test was repeated. Both monologues were transcribed, analyzed and interpreted to isolate a hidden story from each of them. We reconstructed the earlier and later stories. Two threads: “rebellion” and “heritage” appeared in both stories, but they combined to form a more coherent narrative only in the later one. The “closeness with parents” thread, present in the earlier story, was replaced with the “marital love” thread. The character and pattern of the changes illustrate changes that result from developmental factors.
Keywords: monologues, hidden stories, time stability
Article outline
- Introduction
- Hidden stories
- Stability of hidden stories
- Method
- The research participant
- Procedure for isolating hidden stories from monologues
- Results
- Summary of the analysis and interpretation of Monologue 1
- Motifs identified on the basis of content analysis
- Motifs identified on the basis of the way of speaking analysis
- Narrative schema of the story
- Summary of the analysis and interpretation of Monologue 2
- Motifs identified on the basis of content analysis
- Motifs identified on the basis of the way of speaking analysis
- Narrative schema of the story
- Comparison of stories isolated from Monologues 1 and 2
- Summary of the analysis and interpretation of Monologue 1
- Discussion
- Notes
References
References (34)
Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood. A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480.
Brzezińska, A. (2000). Społeczna psychologia rozwoju. [Social psychology of development]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Greenberg, L., & Malcolm, W. (2002). Resolving unfinished business: Relating process to outcome. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 70(2), 406–416.
Friedman, N. (1967). Forms of plot. In Ph. Stevick (Ed.), The theory of the novel (pp. 141–145). New York, NY: The Free Press.
Hermans, H. J. M. (2001). The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture & Psychology (Special Issue: Culture and the dialogical self: Theory, Method and Practice), 7(3), 243–281.
Hill, C. E., Knox, S., Thompson, B. J., Williams, E. N., Hess, S. A., & Ladany, N. (2005). Consensual qualitative research: Update. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 196–205.
Kuncewicz, D., & Kuncewicz, D. (2019). Hidden stories in monologues. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research (FQS), 20(1), Art. 9.
Kuncewicz, D., Kuncewicz, D., Sokołowska, E., & Kruszewski, W. (2016). Rzetelność procedury wyodrębniania opowieści ukrytych z monologów. [Reliability of procedure for isolating hidden stories from monologues]. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 59(4), 351–366.
Kuncewicz, D., Kuncewicz, D., Sokołowska, E., & Sobkowicz, J. (2015). What are you saying when you are talking about…? Procedure for isolating a hidden story in a monologue about the author`s own life. Polish Journal of Applied Psychology, 13(2), 25–46.
Kuncewicz, D., Sokołowska, E., & Sobkowicz, J. (2014). Which literary theory tools can a psychologist use for interpreting language communication? Polish Journal of Applied Psychology, 12(4), 71–94.
Library of Congress, & Billington, J. H. (2010). Respectfully Quoted: A Dictionary of Quotations. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, Inc.
Luborsky, L., & Crits-Christoph, P. (1998). Understanding transference: The Core Conflictual Relationship Theme method. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Markiewicz, H. (1984). Wymiary dzieła literackiego. [Dimensions of a literary work]. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
McAdams, D. (1993). The stories we live by: Personal myths and the making of the self. New York, NY: Morrow.
Morgan, A. (2000). What is narrative therapy? An easy-to read introduction. Adelaide, S. Aust: Dulwich Centre Publications.
Okopień-Sławińska, A. (2001). Semantyka wypowiedzi poetyckiej. [Semantics of poetic expression]. Kraków: Universitas.
Piaget, J. (1923/2001). The language and thought of the child. London & New York: Routledge Classics.
Salvatore, G., Dimaggio, G. A., & Semerari, A. (2004). A model of narrative development: Implications for understanding psychopathology and guiding therapy. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 771, 231–254.
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: an Inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction (3rd ed). London: Sage.
Sławiński, J. (2010). Opowieść [Story]. In J. Sławiński (Ed.), Dictionary of literary terms (p. 359). Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Ossolineum.
Stemplewska-Żakowicz, K. (2002). Koncepcje narracyjnej tożsamości. Od historii życia do dialogowego „ja”. [Concepts of narrative identity. From the story of life to the dialogical “self”], In J. Trzebiński (Ed.), Narracja jako sposób rozumienia świata. [Narration as a way of understanding the world] (pp. 81–113). Gdańsk: Gdańskie Towarzystwo Psychologiczne.
Sternberg, R. J., Hojjat, M., & Barnes, M. L. (2001). Empirical tests of aspects of a theory of love as a story. European Journal of Personality, 151, 199–218.
Summers, R. F., & Barber, J. P. (2009). Psychodynamic Therapy. A guide to evidence-based practice. New York: Guilford Press.
Tomkins, S. S. (1979). Script theory: differential magnification of affects. In H. E. Howe, Jr., and R. A. Dienstiber (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium On Motivation, Vol. 261 (pp. 201–236). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
