Article published In: Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 28:2 (2018) ► pp.237–256
Affect as narrative action in the Global South
An analysis of small stories about transnational same-sex relationships in Cambodia
Published online: 19 October 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.17062.row
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.17062.row
Abstract
This paper focuses on the performance of small stories from two Cambodian men interviewed by the researcher about the relationships
they form with men from the Global North. The analysis attends to the empirical significance of these performances by focusing on
the mobilization of affect as an interactional linguistic and narrative resource that foregrounds social action in this context.
In this way, these small stories reveal how these men may challenge and reshape dominant social discourses at this sexualised
North/South interface. Bringing to the field of narrative inquiry approaches from queer linguistics, and Southern perspectives,
this paper is therefore tasked with exploring what the field may potentially gain from these areas, especially regarding the
theoretical and methodological possibilities of a North/South dialogue in the production of knowledge.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Queer linguistics and “seeing from the South”
- The study in context
- Methodological approach
- Analytical approach
- A focus on small stories
- Affect as narrative action
- Analysis
- Extract 1
- Extract 2
- Concluding remarks
- Acknowledgements
- Note
References
References (43)
Bamberg, M. (2004). Considering counter narratives. In M. Bamberg & M. Andrews (Eds.), Considering counter-narratives: Narrating, resisting, making sense (pp. 351–371). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bamberg, M., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2008). Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text & Talk-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies, 28(3), 377–396.
Brickell, K., & Springer, S. (Eds.) (2017). The handbook of contemporary Cambodia. Abingdon: Routledge.
Copland, F., & Creese, A. (2015). Linguistic ethnography: Collecting, analysing and presenting data. London: SAGE.
De Fina, A. (2013). Positioning level 3: Connecting local identity displays to macrosocial processes. Narrative Inquiry, 23(1), 40–61.
De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2012). Analyzing narrative: Discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gardner, R. (2001). When listeners talk: Response tokens and listener stance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Georgakopoulou, A. (2006). Thinking big with small stories in narrative and identity analysis. Narrative inquiry, 16(1), 122–130.
Hepburn, A., & Potter, J. (2012). Crying and crying responses. In A. Perakyla & M. Sorjonen (Eds.), Emotion in interaction (pp. 195–211). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heritage, J. (2011). Territories of knowledge, territories of experience: empathic moments in interaction. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada & J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation (pp. 159–183). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heuveline, P. (2017). Households and family processes. In K. Brickell & S. Springer (Eds.), The handbook of contemporary Cambodia (pp. 315–325). Abingdon: Routledge.
Hoefinger, H. (2013). Sex, love and money in Cambodia: professional girlfriends and transactional relationships. New York: Routledge.
Hoefinger, H., Ly, P., & Srun, S. (2017). Sex politics and moral panics: LGBT communities, sex/entertainment workers and sexually active youth in Cambodia. In K. Brickell & S. Springer (Eds.), The handbook of contemporary Cambodia (pp. 315–325). Abingdon: Routledge.
Hymes, D. (1996). Ethnography, linguistics, narrative inequality. Toward an understanding of voice. London: Taylor and Francis.
Jackson, P. A. (2001). Pre-gay, post-queer: Thai perspectives on proliferating gender/sex diversity in Asia. In G. Sullivan & P. A. Jackson (Eds.), Gay and lesbian Asia: Culture, identity, community (pp. 1–26). New York: Harrington Park Press.
Katigbak, E. O. (2015). Moralizing emotional remittances: transnational familyhood and translocal moral economy in the Philippines’ ‘Little Italy’. Global Networks, 15(4), 519–535.
Kong, T. S. K., Mahoney, D., & Plummer, K. (2003). Queering the interview. In J. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Inside Interviewing: New Lenses, New Concerns (pp. 91–110). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Lawless, E. J. (2001). Women escaping violence: Empowerment through narrative. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
Lazar, M. (2017). Homonationalist discourse as a politics of pragmatic resistance in Singapore’s Pink Dot movement: Towards a southern praxis. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 21(3), 420–441.
Leap, W. L. (2011). Queer linguistics, sexuality, and discourse analysis. In J. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 558–571). Abingdon: Routledge.
Levon, E. (2015). Integrating intersectionality in language, gender, and sexuality research. Language and Linguistics Compass, 9(7), 295–308.
Marais, A. (2015). ‘Performing identity’: A narrative analysis of young people’s talk of intimate partner violence. Narrative Inquiry, 25(2), 242–263.
Milani, T. M. (2014). Marginally speaking. Multilingual Margins: A journal of multilingualism from the periphery, 1(1), 9–20.
(2015). Language and citizenship: Broadening the agenda. Journal of Language and Politics, 14(3), 319–334.
Milani, T. M., & Lazar, M. M. (2017). Seeing from the South: Discourse, gender and sexuality from southern perspectives. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 21(3), 307–319.
Motschenbacher, H., & Stegu, M. (2013). Queer linguistic approaches to discourse. Discourse and Society, 24(5), 519–535.
Pavlenko, A. (2007). Autobiographical narratives as data in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 28(2), 163–188.
Peck, A., & Stroud, C. (2015). Skinscapes. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1), 133–151.
Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2008). Discursive constructionism. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 275–293). New York: Guildford.
Rooke, A. (2010). Queer in the field: on emotions, temporality, and performativity in ethnography. In K. Brown & C. J. Nash (Eds.), Queer methods and methodologies: Intersecting queer theories and social science research (pp. 25–41). Farnham: Ashgate.
Rowlett, B. J. L. (in press). “The lines are blurred”: Same sex relationships and the local practice of sponsorship in Cambodia. Gender and Language, 13(2).
Rowlett, B. J. L., & King, B. W. (2017). Language education, gender, and sexuality. In S. May & T. McCarty (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 85–97). New York: Springer.
Schiffrin, D. (1996). Narrative as self-portrait: Sociolinguistic constructions of identity. Language in Society, 251, 167–203.
Sharpley, R., & McGrath, P. (2017). Tourism in Cambodia: Opportunities and challenges. In K. Brickell & S. Springer (Eds.), The handbook of contemporary Cambodia (pp. 87–98). Abingdon: Routledge.
Talmy, S. (2010). Qualitative interviews in applied linguistics: From research instrument to social practice. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 301, 128–148.
Van De Mieroop, D., & Clifton, J. (2016). Life stories. In J. Östman & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 1–20). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ward, N. (2006). Non-lexical conversational sounds in American English. Pragmatics and Cognition, 141, 113–184.
Wetherell, M. (2012). Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. London: Sage Publications.
Yep, G. A. (2003). The violence of heteronormativity in communication studies: Notes on injury, healing, queer world-making. In G. A. Yep, K. E. Lovaas & J. P. Elia (Eds.), Queer Theory and Communication: From Disciplining Queers to Queering the Discipline (s) (pp. 11–60). Binghampton, NY: Harrington Park Press.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Motschenbacher, Heiko
Rowlett, Benedict J. L. & Brian W. King
Bharat, Adi Saleem, Pavan Mano & Robert Phillips
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
