Article published In: Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 28:2 (2018) ► pp.373–395
Negation in narrative
Why say what didn’t happen?
Published online: 19 October 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.17028.nor
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.17028.nor
Abstract
Negation in narrative has been described primarily as a resource for expressing evaluation, and secondarily in its role in
establishing orientation, but this article investigates a range of ways negated statements can contribute directly to complicating
action. Negation works through presupposition in the rhetorical figure of paralipsis with phrases like “to say nothing of.”
Reporting “I don’t see how she got in” presupposes that she got in. Semantic double negation in phrases like “never fail to”
contributes to the complicating action. Idiomatic negatives like “didn’t go out” and negatives matching expectations like “didn’t
go to sleep” mirror positive actions in the narrative model. Constructions coupling main clause negation with a positive embedded
clause produce statements entailing actions in the chain of events, as in “I couldn’t face going back.” Taken together, these
constructions provide powerful resources for contributing positively to the dynamic narrative model with negative statements.
Keywords: negation, evaluation, complicating action, orientation, paralipsis, presupposition
Article outline
- Introduction
- Negative versus positive
- Negation inherently weaker
- Negation more difficult
- Negation and denial
- Species of (non-narrative) negation in storytelling
- Global negation ranges over a whole narrative or section of it
- Negation in subordinate functions
- Exculpation
- Negation in orientation and evaluation versus action
- Negation at the outset
- Negated statements as narrative clauses: How to say something positive by saying something negative
- Paralipsis and presupposition
- Constructions positive via double negation
- Standard idioms in negation
- Negative for positive due to expectations
- When saying not entails positive action
- Conclusions
References
References (19)
Ayer, A. J. (1963). Negation. Philosophical
essays, 31, 6–65. London: Macmillan. (Reprinted
from Journal of
Philosophy, 491, 797–815, 1952.)
Clark, H. H. (1974). Semantics
and comprehension. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Current
trends in linguistics, vol.
12 (pp. 1291–1428). The Hague: Mouton.
Corbett, E. P. J., & Connors, R. J. (1998). Classical
rhetoric for the modern student. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eco, U. (1984). The
role of the reader: Explorations in the semiotics of
texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Kissin, P. (1969). Negation
in natural language (Doctoral dissertation). University of Wisconsin-Madison. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms, 1970.
(2013). The
language of life and death: The transformation of experience in oral
narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative
analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays
on the verbal and visual
arts (pp. 12–44). Seattle: University of Washington Press.
(1991). Possible
worlds, artificial intelligence and narrative
theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
(2006). From
parallel universes to possible worlds: Ontological pluralism in physics, narratology and
narrative. Poetics
Today, 271, 633–674.
Volterra, V., & Antinucci, F. (1979). Negation
in child language: A Pragmatic Study. In E. Ochs & B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental
pragmatics (pp. 281–303). New York: Academic Press.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Van De Mieroop, Dorien
2021. The Narrative Dimensions Model and an exploration of various narrative genres. Narrative Inquiry 31:1 ► pp. 4 ff.
Norrick, Neal R.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
