Cover not available

Article published In: Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 28:1 (2018) ► pp.181–197

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

A story more real than reality

The interactional organization of experientiality

 | University of Tampere
Published online: 27 September 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.17008.rau
Abstract
This article examines the concept of experientiality in conversational storytelling from an ethnomethodological perspective, introducing a case in which the narrative mediation of experience fails. The recipient misses the experiential point of the story in the flow of interaction, which stems from other reasons than a failure in sense-making or cognitive comprehension. I discuss my findings with Monika Fludernik’s influential theory of Natural Narratology, according to which all narratives concern experiential exchange between the teller and the recipient, which travels from one consciousness to the other through natural cognitive parameters grounded in real life schemata. Applying conversation analysis, I focus on scrutinizing the details of the turn-by-turn unfolding activities of the participants. My analysis demonstrates that Fludernik’s conception of naturality falls short in capturing the relevancies of naturally occurring storytelling. Ignoring the reflexive intentionality of telling and reception makes Natural Narratology ill-equipped to grasp the dynamics of experientiality in everyday narration.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Methodology
  • Experientiality in action
  • Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (45)
References
Alber, J. (2002). The “moreness” or “lessness” of natural narratology. Style, 36(1), 54–75.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alber, J., Iversen, S., Nielsen, H. S. & Richardson, B. (2010). Unnatural narratives, unnatural narratology: Beyond mimetic models. Narrative, 18(2), 113–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arminen, I. (2005). Institutional interaction: Studies of talk at work. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bamberg, M. (1997). Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 335–342. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Narrative discourse and identities. In J. C. Meister, T. Kindt, W. Schernus, & M. Stein (Eds.), Narratology beyond literary criticism (pp. 213–237). Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Who am I? Narration and its contribution to self and identity. Theory & Psychology, 21(1), 3–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blackman, L. (2012). Immaterial bodies. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caracciolo, M. (2014a). Experientiality. In: P. Hühn, et al. (Eds.): The living handbook of narratology. Hamburg: Hamburg University. URL = [URL] [view date: 7 Feb 2017].
(2014b). The experientiality of narrative. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Day, D., & Kjaerbeck, S. (2013). Positioning in the conversation analytic approach. Narrative Inquiry, 23(1), 16–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, S. & Heritage, J. (2002). The news interview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, P. & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.) Talk at work (pp. 3–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fludernik, M. (1996). Towards a ‘natural’ narratology. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). How natural is “unnatural narratology”; Or what is unnatural about unnatural narratology? Narrative, 20(3), 357–370. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Ethnomethodology’s program. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (1984). Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.) Structures of social action (pp. 225–246). London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1986). Between and within: Alternative sequential treatments of continuers and assessments. Human Studies, 9(2–3), 205–217. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society, 18(1), 53–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. H. (1997). Byplay: Negotiating evaluation in storytelling. In G. R. Guy & C. Feagin & D. Schiffrin & J. Baugh (Eds.) Towards a social science of language, Vol 21. (pp. 77–102). John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hatavara, M. (2015). Documenting everyday life. In M. Hatavara, M. Hyvärinen, M. Mäkelä & F. Mäyrä (Eds.), Narrative theory, literature and new media (pp. 278–294). London: Routledge Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (1985). Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis Vol. 3 (pp. 95–117). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Territories of knowledge, territories of experience: Empathic moments in interaction. In T. Stivers & L. Mondada & J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation (pp. 159–183). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herman, D. (2002). Story logic. Lincoln, Neb.: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyvärinen, M. (2017a, forthcoming). Expectations and experientiality: Jerome Bruner’s ‘canonicity and breach.’ Storyworlds.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017b). Foreword: Life meets narrative. In B. Schiff, A. E. McKim, & S. Patron (Eds.) Life and narrative (pp. IX–XXV) New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karttunen, L. (2015). The hypothetical in literature: Emotion and emplotment. Doctoral Dissertation (Literary Studies): University of Tampere, The School of Language, Translation and Literary Studies.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, W. & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis. In J. Helm (Ed.) Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12–44). Seattle: U. of Washington Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, J. (1991). Conversational non-co-operation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 251, 97–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Storytelling in conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.). The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 492–507). Chichester: Wiley- Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pickering, M. (2004). Experience as horizon: Koselleck, expectation and historical time. Cultural Studies, 18(2–3), 271–289. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.) Structures of social action (pp. 57–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rautajoki, H. (2012). Membership categorization as a tool for moral casting in TV discussion. Discourse Studies, 14(2), 243–260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rautajoki, H. & Toikkanen, J. & Raudaskoski, P. (in review). Embodied ekphrasis of experience: Bodily rhetoric in mediating affect in interaction. Semiotica, x–xx.
Riessman, C. K. (1990). Divorce talk. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1972). On the analyzability of the stories by children. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics (pp. 329–345). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1984). On doing “being ordinary”. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.) Structures of social action (pp. 413–429). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). Lectures on conversation: Volumes I & II. Edited by Gail Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 501, 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1995). Introduction. In H. Sacks. Lectures on conversation: Volumes I & II. (Ed.) Gail Jefferson (pp. ix–lxii). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997). Narrative analysis’ 30 years later. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 97–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on language and social interaction, 41(1), 31–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Rautajoki, Hanna, Jarkko Toikkanen & Pirkko Raudaskoski
2020. Embodied ekphrasis of experience: Bodily rhetoric in mediating affect in interaction. Semiotica 2020:235 ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue