Cover not available

Article published In: Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 28:1 (2018) ► pp.1–29

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Evaluating evaluation

Interactional positioning and embodied narration in police interviews

 | University of Illinois at Chicago
Published online: 27 September 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.17005.gil
Abstract
This study examines a participant’s narrative in a focus group interview dealing with the evaluation of criminal justice policy – the impact of community policing training. However, rather than look at the narrative solely in the speech of the interviewee, I analyze the integration of speech and embodied conduct like gesture, gaze, and posture in the production and negotiation of professional identities. I demonstrate the applied merits of a multimodal approach to criminal justice evaluation in the mapping between denotational text and interactional positioning, a mapping that inheres in embodied stance and broader sociocultural context.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Evaluating criminal justice programs through focus group interviews
  • Embodied conduct in focus group narratives
  • Ethnographic overview and data
  • Data example 1
  • Lines 01–14 Embodied role shift: Moving toward an enactment of experience
  • Lines 15–18 If you’re a Chicago agency and don’t get cooperation from you
  • Lines 19–30 Hypothetical reported speech: Multimodal quotation
  • Mapping denotational text onto interactional positioning
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (52)
References
Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Texas: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bamberg, M., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2008). Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text and Talk, 28(3), 377–396. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Briggs, C. (1986). Learning how to ask: A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chappell, A., & Lanza-Kaduce, L. (2010). Police academy socialization: Understanding the lessons learned in a paramilitary-bureaucratic organization. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 39 (2), 187–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Fina, A., & Georgakpoulou, A. (2012). Analyzing narrative: Discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Jorio, A. (2000). Gesture in Naples and gesture in classical antiquity. (A. Kendon, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (Original work published in 1832)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deppermann, A. (2015). Positioning. In A. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The handbook of narrative analysis (pp. 369–387). NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DuBois, B. (1989). Pseudoquotation in current English communication; “Hey, she didn’t really say it.” Language in Society. 181, 343–359. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuller, J. (2003). Use of the discourse marker like in interviews. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(3), 365–377. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2014). Language and the manual modality: The communicative resilience of the human species. In N. Enfield, P. Kockelman & J. Sidnell (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology (pp. 78–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 321, 1489–1522. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Embodied hearers and speakers constructing talk and action in interaction. Cognitive Studies, 16(1), 51–64.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. (2004). Participation. In A. Duranti (Ed.), A Companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 222–244). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanks, W. (2006). Joint commitment and common ground in a ritual event. In N. Enfield & S. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of sociality (pp. 299–328). New York: Berg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haviland, J. (2015). Hey! Topics in Cognitive Science, 71, 124–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaffe, A. (2009). Introduction: The sociolinguistics of stance. In A. Jaffe (Ed)., Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives (pp. 3–28). New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement. In T. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 398–429). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kasper, G. (2013). Conversation analysis and interview studies. In The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. New York: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kita, S. (2003). Pointing: A foundational building block of human communication. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet (pp. 85–108). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (2000). Language and gesture: Unity or duality. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 47–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lawson, C. (2014). Situating police in a late modern society. The ontology of police identity. Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles, 87(4), pp. 270–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matoesian, G. (2001). Law and the language of identity: Discourse in the William Kennedy Smith rape trial. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Struck by speech revisited: Embodied stance in jurisdictional discourse. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9(2), 167–194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Gesture’s community: Social organization in multimodal conduct. Language in Society, 41(3), 365–391. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matoesian, G., & Coldren, J. (2002). Language and bodily conduct in focus group evaluations of legal policy. Discourse and Society, 13(4), 469–493. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, J. (2009). Like and other discourse markers. In P. Peters, P. Collins & A. Smith (Eds.), Comparative studies in Australian and New Zealand English: Grammar and beyond (pp. 317–337). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morgan, D. (1998). The focus group guidebook. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers, G. (1999). Unspoken speech: Hypothetical reported discourse and the rhetoric of everyday talk. Text, 19(4), 571–590. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Matters of opinion: Talking about public issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Puchta, C., & Potter, J. (2004). Focus group practice. London: Sage Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. (2002). Evaluating multi-agency anti-crime partnerships: Theory, design, and measurement issues. In N. Tilley (Ed.), Evaluation for crime prevention: Crime Prevention Studies, 141, 171–225.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sauer, B. (2003). The rhetoric of risk: Technical documentation in hazardous environments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scheibman, J. (2004). Inclusive and exclusive patterning of the English first person plural: Evidence from conversation. In M. Achard & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, culture and mind (pp. 377–396). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sidnell, J. (2006). Coordinating gesture, talk, and gaze in reenactments. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 391, 377–409. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (1998). The improvisational performance of culture in realtime discursive practice. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Creativity in performance (pp. 265–312). Greenwich, CT: AblexGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Denotation and the pragmatics of language. In N. Enfield, P. Kockelman and J. Sidnell (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology (pp. 128–157). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Streeck, J. (2008). Gesture in political communication: A case study of the democratic presidential candidates during the 2004 primary campaign. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(2), 154–186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tilley, N. (2002). Introduction: Evaluation for crime prevention. Crime Prevention Studies, 141, 1–10.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tilley, N. & Clarke, A. (2006). Evaluation in criminal justice. In I. Shaw, J. Greene and M. Mark (Eds.), The Sage handbook of evaluation (pp. 512–535). London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Travers, M. (2005). Evaluation research and criminal justice: Beyond a political critique. The Australian and New Zeland Journal of Criminology, 38(1), 39–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilkinson, S. (2004). Focus group research. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method, and practice (pp. 177–199). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Analysing interaction in focus groups. In P. Drew, G. Raymond & D. Weinberg (Eds.), Talk and interaction in social research methods (pp. 50–62). London: Sage Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wortham, S. (2001). Narratives in action: A strategy for research and analysis. New York, NY: Teachers Colleges Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wortham, S., & Reyes, A. (2015). Discourse analysis beyond the speech event. New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Wieslander, Malin & Håkan Löfgren
2025. Turning points as a tool in narrative research. Narrative Inquiry 35:1 ► pp. 26 ff. DOI logo
de Vries, Clarissa, Fien Andries & Katharina Meissl
2024. Mocking enactments: a case study of multimodal stance-stacking. Frontiers in Psychology 15 DOI logo
Andries, Fien, Katharina Meissl, Clarissa de Vries, Kurt Feyaerts, Bert Oben, Paul Sambre, Myriam Vermeerbergen & Geert Brône
2023. Multimodal stance-taking in interaction—A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Communication 8 DOI logo
Gilbert, Kristin Enola
2020. Kinesics and Gesture. In The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue