Review published In: Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 14:1 (2004) ► pp.231–234
Book review
. Psychonarratology: Foundations for the empirical study of literary response. Marisa Bortolussi & Peter Dixon. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 2003. 304 pp. ISBN 0-521-00913-8
Reviewed by
Published online: 1 July 2004
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.14.1.11moi
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.14.1.11moi
References (13)
Bamberg, M. (in press). “I know it may sound mean to say this, but we couldn’t really care less about her anyway.” Form and functions of ‘slut-bashing’ in male identity constructions in 15-year-olds. Human Development.
Davis, T. F., & Womack, K. (2002). Formalist criticism and reader-response theory. New York: Palgrave.
Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gentikow, B. (1997). The contested power of persuasion: A rhetorical approach to reception theory and analysis (Working Paper No. 221). Bergen, Norway: University of Bergen, Department of Media Studies.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
Halliday, M. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London. Edward Arnold.
Herman, D. (2001). Narrative theory and the cognitive sciences. Narrative Inquiry, 11(1), 1–34.
Miall, D. S. (2003). Literary discourse. In A. C. Graesser, M. A. Gernsbacher, & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 321–355). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
