Article published In: Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 10:2 (2000) ► pp.313–340
“Really Unreal”: Narrative Evaluation and the Objectification of Experience
Published online: 16 May 2001
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.10.2.03gwy
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.10.2.03gwy
The specific narrative feature of ‘evaluation’, as described by Labov and Waletzky (1967/97), is not a discrete and secondary structure, but rather is embedded in the continuous acts of description that constitute a story, as well in the second-order evaluations provided by reported speech. Making use of Bakhtin’s (1984) concepts of polyphony and dialogism and recent work on ‘active voicing’, it is argued that (a) evaluation is a continuous and constantly shifting process within the narrative encounter; and (b) within this process, polyphony becomes a means towards the objectification of personal experience. Narratives are not the static discourses of literary theory and structuralist analysis, but dialogically evolving episodes of interaction, in which evaluations are frequently co-constructed between speaker and listener. (Narrative, Evaluation, Polyphony, Dialogic, Co-constructed, Objectification)
Cited by (15)
Cited by 15 other publications
Sabo Mordechay, Daphna, Zohar Eviatar & Bracha Nir
Wang, Li, Lay Hoon Ang, Fumeng Gao & Hazlina Abdul Halim
Tonkin, Kendra, Hilah Silver, Juan Pimentel, Anne Marie Chomat, Ivan Sarmiento, Loubna Belaid, Anne Cockcroft & Neil Andersson
Minnaert, Lynn
Hartman, Tova
Minami, Masahiko
Goldberg, Tsafrir, Baruch B. Schwarz & Dan Porat
Stirling, Lesley, Lenore Manderson & Jennifer MacFarlane
Lee, Hakyoon
Atkinson, Paul
Manderson, Lenore & Lesley Stirling
Roberts, Kathleen Glenister
Valsiner, Jaan
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
