Article published In: Linguistics in the Netherlands 2025
Edited by Kristel Doreleijers, Remco Knooihuizen and Eva van Lier
[Nota Bene 2:2] 2025
► pp. 269–288
Tread lightly
Deriving distributional differences in Dutch manner adverbials
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with Utrecht University.
Published online: 31 October 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/nb.00033.clo
https://doi.org/10.1075/nb.00033.clo
Abstract
Different Dutch manner adverbials exhibit different syntactic behaviour in embedded clauses (1); given accounts of the supposed cross-linguistic uniformity of manner adverbials as adpositional phrases, this comes as a surprise.
(1)
…dat
…that
Reinder
R.
het
the
parcours
course
<
op
on
deze
this
manier
manner
/
/
te
on
voet>
foot
aflegt <op deze manier/*te voet>.
traverses
‘…that Reinder is traversing the course in this way/on foot.’
I argue non-uniform distribution of Dutch manner adverbial PPs is related to differences in their internal structure; lightness of the nominal complement embedded in them is shown to affect the structure of PP, which in turn affects how they distribute. With Collins, Chris. 2007. Home Sweet Home. NYU Working Papers in Linguistics, 11. and . 1994. Predicate Incorporation and the Word Order of Dutch. In Guglielmo Cinque, Jan Koster, Jean-Yves Pollock, Luigi Rizzi, & Rafaella. Zanuttini (Eds.), Paths Towards Universal Grammar: Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne (Vol. 11, p. 491). Georgetown University Press., I argue light PPs, as complements of the verb, must move away from sentence-final position, while non-light PPs do so optionally, deriving the observed distributional disparity between MAs.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Lightness matters
- 2.1Dutch MAs with light v. non-light noun phrases under extraposition
- 2.2What’s (in) a light noun?
- 2.3Light complement, light PP
- 3.Deriving the distribution of Dutch MAs
- 3.1Collins (2007) and Koster (1994) on the distribution of PPs
- 3.2Dutch light PP MA as V-complements
- 4.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (38)
Abney, Steven P. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect [PhD dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Alexeyenko, Sascha. 2015. The Syntax and Semantics of Manner Modification: Adjectives and Adverbs. University of Osnabrück.
Alexiadou, Artemis. 1997. Adverb placement: A case study in antisymmetric syntax. John Benjamins Publishing Company. [URL].
Broekhuis, Hans. 2013. Syntax of Dutch: Adpositions and adpositional phrases. Amsterdam University Press. [URL]
Broekhuis, Hans & Norbert Corver. 2019. Syntax of Dutch: Coordination and Ellipsis (H. Van Riemsdijk, I. Kenesei, & H. Broekhuis, Eds.). Amsterdam University Press.
Brugé, Laura. 2002. The Positions of Demonstratives in the Extended Nominal Projection. In Guglielmo Cinque (Ed.), Functional Structure in DP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures (pp. 15–53). Oxford University Press, Incorporated. [URL].
Cardinaletti, Anna & Michal Starke. 1994. The Typology of Structural Deficiency: On the Three Grammatical Classes. Working Papers in Linguistics. 4.21, 41–109.
Cloin-Tavenier, Lex. 2024. Dialect variation in Dutch manner adverbs: Stilletjeser or stillertjes as comparative? Nota Bene 1(2). 151–175.
. 2025b, March 6. Doing it (in) my way: A cross-linguistic perspective on (non-)optional adpositions in Manner Adverbials. MiMA!-workshop on the Grammar of Manner Adverbials, Utrecht.
Corver, Norbert. 2021a. Adverbial -s as Last Resort: N and a get their support. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 1023–1073.
. 2021b. Decomposing (non-)interrogative ’how’-clauses: A case study on Dutch. [URL]
. 2024. On the inner structure of manner-adverbial expressions: From a mono-lingual perspective to a comparative-linguistic perspective.
Den Dikken, Marcel. 2010. On the Functional Structure of Locative and Directional PPs. In Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (Eds.), Mapping Spatial PPs: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 6 (pp. 75–126). Oxford University Press.
Den Dikken, Marcel, & Éva Dékány. 2025. Functional Architecture of Prepositional Phrases. In Sjef Barbiers, Norbert Corver, & Maria Polinsky (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Comparative Syntax (p. 32). Cambridge University Press.
Emonds, Joseph. 1987. The Invisible Category Principle. Linguistic Inquiry, Vol. 18, No. 4. 613–632.
Giusti, Guglielmo. 2002. The Functional Structure of Noun Phrases: A Bare Phrase Structure Approach. In Functional Structure in DP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures (pp. 54–90). Oxford University Press, Incorporated. [URL].
Grimshaw, Jane. 2000. Locality and Extended Projection. In Lexical specification and insertion (pp. 115–133). John Benjamins Publishing Company. [URL].
Inokuma, Sakumi. 2013. Distribution of phi-features within DPs and the activity condition. English Linguistics, 30(1). 292-312.
Katz, Graham. 2003. Event arguments, adverb selection, and the Stative Adverb Gap. Modifying adjuncts, 455–474.
Koopman, Hilda. 2010. Prepositions, Postpositions, Circumpositions, and Particles: The Structure of Dutch PPs. In Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (Eds.), Mapping Spatial PPs: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 6 (pp. 26–73). Oxford University Press.
. 1994. Predicate Incorporation and the Word Order of Dutch. In Guglielmo Cinque, Jan Koster, Jean-Yves Pollock, Luigi Rizzi, & Rafaella. Zanuttini (Eds.), Paths Towards Universal Grammar: Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne (Vol. 11, p. 491). Georgetown University Press.
Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the semantics of English. A Study in Subatomic Semantics. MIT Press.
. 2021. Noun phrases, big and small. In Sabine Laszakovits & Zheng Shen (Eds.), The size of things I: Structure building (Vol. 11, pp. 323–337). Language Science Press.
Pesetsky, David, & Torrego, Esther. 2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation (pp. 262–292).
