Cover not available

Article published In: Linguistics in the Netherlands 2024
Edited by Marco Bril and Kristel Doreleijers
[Nota Bene 1:2] 2024
► pp. 151–175

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB

Dialect variation in Dutch manner adverbs

Stilletjeser or stillertjes as comparative?

 | Utrecht University
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with Utrecht University.

Published online: 24 January 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/nb.00011.clo
Abstract
Some Dutch manner adverbs are marked with diminutive morphology and ‘adverbial -s’; cf. still-etje-s (quiet-DIM-S) ‘quietly’. This morphological material interacts with comparative/superlative formation: in Standard Dutch (SD), comparatives/superlatives of diminutive manner adverbs (DMAs) are ill-formed. Dialect reference grammars and novel questionnaire data reveal variation that is unaccounted for; some dialects allow comparative/superlative DMAs.
I propose a unified analysis of SD and dialectal DMA patterns. Based on a discussion of morphosyntactic and semantic properties of the Dutch diminutive and prior analysis of -s, I propose that DMAs decompose into a phrasal category featuring a manner noun marked by diminutive morphology and a small clause headed by -s. This analysis of DMAs is comparable to that of Dutch blootshoofds ‘bare-headed’. Identified loci of variable affix ordering and variation between SD and dialects are PF/linearization and variation in the functional domain, respectively.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Dutch diminutive morphology and DMAs
    • 2.1The morphosyntax of the Dutch diminutive
    • 2.2The semantics of Dutch DMAs
  • 3.Dutch DMAs and -s
    • 3.1Corver (2021) on Standard Dutch DMAs
    • 3.2Corver (2007) on blootshoofds
  • 4.Accounting for DMAs, variable affix ordering, and variation
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (31)
References
Alexeyenko, Sascha. 2015. The syntax and semantics of manner modification: Adjectives and adverbs. University of Osnabrück.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alrenga, Peter, Christopher Kennedy & Jason Merchant. 2012. A new standard of comparison. In Nathan Arnett & Ryan Bennett (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 32–42. Cascadilla Proceedings Project. [URL]
Baker, Mark. 1985. The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16(3). 373–415.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan. 2012. Universals in Comparative Morphology: Suppletion, Superlatives, and the Structure of Words. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 1983. Parametric Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowers, John. 1993. The syntax of predication. Linguistic inquiry 24(4). 591–656.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program (20th anniversary edition). MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clercq, Karen de, Pavel Caha, Michal Starke & Guido Vanden Wyngaerd. 2023. Degree morphology. In Peter Ackema, Eulàlia Bonet, Sabrina Bendjaballah & Antonio Fábregas (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to morphology, 1–42. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corver, Norbert. 2005. Double comparative and the comparative criterion. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 341. 165–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Dutch ’s-prolepsis as a copying phenomenon. In Norbert Corver & Jairo Nunes (eds.), The Copy Theory of Movement, 175–216. John Benjamins B.V. [URL].
. 2021. Adverbial -s as Last Resort: N and a get their support. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 1023–1073.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Belder, Marijke. 2011. Roots and Affixes: Eliminating Lexical Categories from Syntax [PhD dissertation, Utrecht University]. [URL]
. 2022. The extravagant Dutch suffix-ke and its meandering through the interfaces. In Matthias Eitelmann & Dagmar Haumann (eds.), Extravagant Morphology: Studies in rule-bending, pattern-extending and theory-challenging morphology, 101–129. John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Belder, Marijke, Noam Faust, & Nicola Lampitelli. 2014. On a low and a high diminutive: Evidence from Italian and Hebrew. In The syntax of roots and the root of syntax, 149–163.
De Bont, Anton P. 1958. Dialekt van Kempenland, meer in het bijzonder d’Oerse toal. Deel II: Vocabularium. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Déchaine, Rose-Marie & Mireille Tremblay. 1996. Adverbial PPs and prepositional adverbs in French and English. Canadian Linguistics Association Proceedings, University of Calgaray Working Papers in Linguistics, 81–92.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dékány, Éva. 2018. Approaches to head movement: A critical assessment. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(1). 1–43.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Den Dikken, Marcel. 2006. Relators and Linkers: The Syntax of Predication, Predicate Inversion, and Copulas. Cambridge MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph. 1987. The invisible category principle. Linguistic Inquiry 18(4). 613–632.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert & Damir Ćavar. 2002. Distributed Deletion. In Artemis Alexiadou (ed.), Theoretical approaches to universals, 65–107. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gunnink, Jurriën. 1908. Het dialect van Kampen en omstreken. Kampen: J.H. Kok.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 201. 111–176. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kagan, Olga & Sascha Alexeyenko. 2010. Degree modification in Russian morphology: The case of the suffix-ovat. In Proceedings of IATL 261. 1–15.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax 251. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiss, Katalin É. & Veronika Hegedüs. (eds.). 2021. Syntax of Hungarian: Vol. Postpositions and Postpositional Phrases. Amsterdam University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manninen, Satu H. 2003. Small Phrase Layers: A Study of Adverbials. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Potts, Christopher. 2007. The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 33(2). 165–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ritter, Elizabeth & Martina Wiltschko. 2023. Evaluative morphology: Universals and variation. In The Wiley Blackwell Compendium to Morphology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Royen, Gerlach. 1947–1954. Buigingsverschijnselen in het Nederlands. Delen I-IV. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers Maatschappij.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schuringa, Frans. 1923. Het dialect van de Veenkoloniën in verband met de overige tongvallen in de provincie Groningen. Groningen: Wolters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina & Olga Steriopolo. 2007. Parameters of variation in the syntax of diminutives. Proceedings of the 2007 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, 1–12.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Cloin-Tavenier, Lex
2025. Tread lightly. Nota Bene 2:2 ► pp. 269 ff. DOI logo
Cloin-Tavenier, Lex
2025. Analysing Dutch Present Participle Manner Adverbials. Languages 10:4 ► pp. 70 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue