Cover not available

Oration published In: Metaphor in Religion and Spirituality
Edited by Stephen Pihlaja
[Metaphor and the Social World 7:1] 2017
► pp. 130151

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (36)
References
Deignan, A., Littlemore, J., & Semino, E. (2013). Figurative language, genre and register. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gavins, J., & Steen, G. (Eds.). (2003). Cognitive poetics in practice. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Intentions in the experience of meaning. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Metaphor and thought: The state of the art. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 3–13), Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes, 481, 529–562. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). The real complexities of psycholinguistic research on metaphor. Language Sciences, 401, 45–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphor in human life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(Ed.). (2008). The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R., & Colston, H. (2012). Interpreting figurative meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(Eds.). (2007). Irony in language and thought: A cognitive science reader. New York: Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R., & Gerrig, R. (Eds.) (1989). Special invited issue: Context and metaphor comprehension. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 31, 123–201.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & Bowdle, B. (2008). Metaphor as structure-mapping. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 109–128). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giora, R. (2008). Is metaphor unique? In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 143–160). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glucksberg, S. (2008). How metaphors create categories – quickly. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 67–83). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grady, J. (1997). theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(4), 267–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, R. A. (1993). The linguistics wars. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katz, A., Cacciari, C., Gibbs, R., & Turner, M. (1998). Figurative language and thought. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction, (2nd ed.). Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortony, A. (Ed.). (1979). Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [2nd edition, 1993].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically-used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2008). A deflationary account of metaphor. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 84–105). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G. (1994). Understanding metaphor in literature: An empirical approach. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). From linguistic to conceptual metaphor in five steps. In R. Gibbs & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics. Selected papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Amsterdam, July 1997 (pp. 57–77). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G., & Gibbs, R. (2004). Questions about metaphor in literature. European Journal of English Studies, 81, 337–354. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G., Dorst, A., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tendahl, M., & Gibbs, R. (2008). Complementary perspectives on metaphor: Cognitive linguistics and relevance theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(11), 1823–1864. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
VU Amsterdam Metaphor Corpus. [URL]
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Faur, Elena
2021. Filologia modernă: realizări şi perspective în context european, Eugeniu Coșeriu: 100 de ani de la naștere. Limbajul ca sumă de valori,  pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Grujic, Tatjana
2020. Pristupi pojmovnoj metafori. Forum 2:1-2  pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Rasulić, Katarina
2020. Turning the heart into a neighbour. In The Language of Crisis [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 87],  pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Rasulić, Katarina & Mirjana Mišković-Luković
2020. ŠTA SPAJA A ŠTA RAZDVAJA KOGNITIVNOLINGVISTIČKI I KONITIVNOPRAGMATIČKI PRISTUP METAFORI?. Lipar :72  pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Smith, Thomas H.
2009. If 'Journeys' and 'Things' Frame Our Thinking, Can We Adequately Reason About the Nature of Conflict?. SSRN Electronic Journal DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue