Article published In: Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 6:2 (2016) ► pp.225–242
The mind is an ecosystem
Systemic metaphors promote systems thinking
Published online: 20 October 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.6.2.03thi
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.6.2.03thi
Is income inequality more of a blemish or a failing organ in our economy? Both metaphors capture something about wealth disparities, but only failing organ seems to emphasize the fact that our economy is a complex system, where activity in one region may lead to a cascade of problems in other parts of the system. In the present study, we introduce a novel method for classifying such ‘systemic’ metaphors, which reveals that people can reliably identify the extent to which a metaphor highlights the complex causal structure of a target domain. In a second experiment, we asked whether exposing people to more systemic metaphors would induce a systems-thinking mindset and influence reasoning on a seemingly unrelated task that measured the degree to which people reasoned about a domain in terms of complex causal relations. We found that participants who were primed with systemic metaphors scored higher on subsequent tasks that measured relational and holistic thinking, supporting the view that these metaphors can promote systems thinking. Our discussion highlights the potential role of systemic metaphors in facilitating reasoning and decision-making in complex domains.
Keywords: systems thinking, decision-making, metaphor, analogy, intervention, framing
References (33)
Boroditsky, L., Fuhrman, O., & McCormick, K. (2010). Do English and Mandarin speakers think differently about time? Cognition, 1181, 123–129.
Checkland, P.B. (1972). Towards a systems-based methodology for real-world problem solving. Journal of Systems Engineering, 31, 87–116.
Choi, I., Dalal, R., Kim-Prieto, C., & Park, H. (2003). Culture and judgment of causal relevance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 841, 46–59.
Choi, I., Koo, M., & Choi, J.A. (2007). Individual differences in analytic versus holistic thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 331, 691–705.
Clark, H.H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T.E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.
Davis, A.C., & Stroink, M.L. (2015). The relationship between systems thinking and the new ecological paradigm. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. Available online pre-publication: [URL].
Flusberg, S.J., Thibodeau, P.H., Sternberg, D.A., & Glick, J.J. (2010). A connectionist approach to embodied conceptual metaphor. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 197.
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 71, 155–170.
Hauser, D.J., & Schwarz, N. (2014). The war on prevention bellicose cancer metaphors hurt (some) prevention intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 411, 66–77.
Lakoff, G. (2002). Moral politics: How conservatives and liberals think. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Landau, M.J., Sullivan, D., & Greenberg, J. (2009). Evidence that self-relevant motives and metaphoric framing interact to influence political and social attitudes. Psychological Science, 201, 1421–1427.
Maani, K.E., & Maharaj, V. (2004). Links between systems thinking and complex decision making. System Dynamics Review, 201, 21–48.
Maddux, W.W., & Yuki, M. (2006). The “ripple effect”: Cultural differences in perceptions of the consequences of events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 321, 669–683.
Nisbett, R.E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 1081, 291.
Pennebaker, J.W., Chung, C.K., Ireland, M., Gonzales, A., & Booth, R.J. (2007). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007. Austin, TX: LIWC. Net.
Richmond, B. (1993). Systems thinking – critical thinking skills for the 1990s and beyond. System Dynamics Review, 91, 113–133.
Rottman, B.M., Gentner, D., & Goldwater, M.B. (2012). Causal systems categories: Differences in novice and expert categorization of causal phenomena. Cognitive science, 361, 919–932.
Rozenblit, L., & Keil, F. (2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science, 261, 521–562.
Steen, G.J., Reijnierse, W.G., & Burgers, C. (2014). When do natural language metaphors influence reasoning? A follow-up study to Thibodeau and Boroditsky (2013). PloS ONE, 9(12), e113536.
Rutherford, E. (1911). The scattering of α and β particles by matter and the structure of the atom. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 211, 669–688.
Sweeney, L.B., & Sterman, J. (2007). Thinking about systems: Student and teacher conceptions of natural and social systems. Systems Dynamics Review, 231, 285–312.
Thibodeau, P.H., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE, 6(2), e16782.
Traugott, E.C. (1978). On the expression of spatiotemporal relations in language. In J.H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language, vol. 3, Word structure (pp. 369–400). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Cited by (15)
Cited by 15 other publications
Finley, Kate
Frantz, Cynthia McPherson, Julia Blotner & John E. Petersen
Marghetis, Tyler & Teenie Matlock
Mars, Matthew M.
Flusberg, Stephen J., Alison Mackey, Elena Semino & Wojciech Trzebiński
Amel, Elise L., Christie M. Manning, Catherine S. Daus & Makayla Quinn
Flusberg, Stephen J. & Paul H. Thibodeau
van den Boom, Lieke A.T.P., Karlijn L. van den Broek, Floor M. Kroese, Ellen H.M. Moors & Denise T.D. de Ridder
Thibodeau, Paul H. & Stephen J. Flusberg
2022. Metaphor and elaboration in context. In Dynamism in Metaphor and Beyond [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 9], ► pp. 223 ff.
Walsh-Childers, Kim & Jennifer Braddock
Beger, Anke & Thomas H. Smith
2020. Introduction. In How Metaphors Guide, Teach and Popularize Science [Figurative Thought and Language, 6], ► pp. 1 ff.
Smith, Thomas H.
2020. Three metaphors in social science. In How Metaphors Guide, Teach and Popularize Science [Figurative Thought and Language, 6], ► pp. 211 ff.
Thibodeau, Paul H., Cynthia McPherson Frantz & Matias Berretta
Thibodeau, Paul H., Rose K. Hendricks & Lera Boroditsky
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
