Cover not available

Article published In: Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 6:1 (2016) ► pp.103–133

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

“Pour water where it burns”

Dysphemistic conceptualizations of the enemy in Persian political discourse

 | Eötvös Loránd University, Hungary.
Published online: 12 May 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.6.1.05bak
While dysphemism has been extensively studied as a general phenomenon, there are not too many studies on how it is used in political discourse by top officials. This paper aims to examine the ways in which a sample of two high-level Iranian politicians offensively conceptualize their alleged enemies, namely the U.S., Israel, and the West, through conceptual metaphors and metonymies. A cognitive linguistic analysis of the speeches of Iran’s supreme leader and ex-president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad indicate that the selection of the metaphorical dysphemistic source domain is primarily determined by religion, previous discourse (pre-existing conventional dysphemistic metaphors), aspects of the target domain, and anger or hatred toward the enemies. The analysis indicates that most of the pejorative connotations are attributed to Israel as the alleged number one enemy of Iran via Israel is an animal, Israel is a tumor, and Israel is a bastard. The other presumed enemies, that is, the U.S. and the West are characterized via the u.s. is a devil, and the u.s. and the west are criminals. Moreover, the two politicians, while resorting to taboo concepts, remain loyal to the established discursive norms of delegitimizing the actions and thoughts of the enemies of the Islamic Republic.
References (34)
Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (1991). Euphemism and dysphemism. Language used as shield and weapon. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006). Forbidden words: Taboo and the censoring of language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, L., & Trudgill, P.J. (1990). Bad language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bostrom, R.N., Baseheart, J.R., & Rossiter, C.M. (1973). The effect of three types of profane language in persuasive messages. Journal of Communication, 231, 461–475. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burridge, K. (2004). Blooming English: Observations on the roots, cultivation and hybrids of the English language. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, L. (1999). Operationalizing ‘metaphor’ for applied linguistic research. In L. Cameron & G.D. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 3–28). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cavazza, N., & Guidetti, M. (2014). Swearing in political discourse why vulgarity works. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(5), 537–547. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chamizo Dominguez, P.J., & Zawislawska, M. (2006). Animal names used as insults and derogation in Polish and Spanish. Philologia Hispalensis, 201, 137–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2005). Politicians and rhetoric. The persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2007). The communication of leadership. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, P. (2004). Analyzing political discourse: Theory and practice. London & New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crespo-Fernández, E. (2008). Sex-related euphemism and dysphemism: An analysis in terms of conceptual metaphor theory. Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies, 30(2), 95–110.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013). Words as weapons for mass persuasion: Dysphemism in Churchill’s wartime speeches. Text & Talk, 33(3), 311–330. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davis, H. (1989). What makes bad language bad. Language & Communication, 9(1), 1–9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gradecak-Erdeljic, T., & Milic, G. (2011). Metonymy at the crossroads: A case of euphemisms and dysphemisms. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, & F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibanez (Eds.), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view (pp. 147–166). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamilton, M.A. (1989). Reactions to obscene language. Communication Research Reports, 61, 67–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jay, T. (1992). Cursing in America. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2009). The utility and ubiquity of taboo words. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 41, 153–161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jay, T., & Janschewitz, K. (2008). The pragmatics of swearing. Journal of Politeness Research, 41, 267–288. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006). Language, mind and culture. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1992). Metaphors and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf. In M. Putz (Ed.), Thirty years of linguistic evolution (pp. 463–481). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, A. (2010). Metaphor, nation, and the Holocaust. The concept of the body politic. New York & London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2008). Freedom’s curse. The Atlantic Monthly, 3021, 28–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sagarin, E. (1962). The anatomy of dirty words. New York: Lyle Stuart.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scherer, C.R., & Sagarin, B.J. (2006). Indecent influence: The positive effects of obscenity on persuasion. Social Influence, 11, 138–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, E., & Masci, M. (1996). Politics is football: Metaphor in the discourse of Silvio Berlusconi in Italy. Society and Discourse, 7(2), 243–269. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wainryb, R. (2005). Expletive deleted: A good look at bad language. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Warnaar, M. (2013). Iranian foreign policy during Ahmadinejad: Ideology and actions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Juszczyk, Konrad, Barbara Konat & Małgorzata Fabiszak
2022. Speakers who metaphorize together – argue together. Metaphor and the Social World 12:2 ► pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
Kujawiak, Aleksandra
2022. Dysfemistyczne konceptualizacje polityków i polityki w dyskursie internetowym (na przykładzie portali Wpolityce.pl i Newsweek.pl). Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Linguistica 56 ► pp. 283 ff. DOI logo
Khatin-Zadeh, Omid & Hooshang Khoshsima
2021. Homo-schematic Metaphors: A Study of Metaphor Comprehension in Three Different Priming Conditions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 50:4 ► pp. 923 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue