Cover not available

Article published In: The political impact of metaphors
Edited by Julien Perrez and Min Reuchamps
[Metaphor and the Social World 5:2] 2015
► pp. 177–204

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Framing, metaphor and dialogue

A multimodal approach to party conference speeches

 | Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense
 | Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité
Published online: 28 September 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.5.2.01deb
This paper considers the Party Conference Speech as a paradigmatic example of effective political discourse, so as to identify and analyse the elements that make for the successful reception of a speech, and determine the ways in which the leader brings about consensus and generates applause. Methodologically speaking, our framework for analysis combines (i) quantitative and qualitative methods, as well as (ii) textual and multimodal analyses of the performed text. We start with a quantitative overview of party conference speeches analysed as written corpora, before zooming in on Tony Blair’s 2006 party conference speech, in which we identify what non-verbal strategies come into play in the discursive construction of the leader’s individual and the party’s collective identities.
References (52)
Archer, D. (2009). Does frequency really matter? In D. Archer (Ed.), What’s in a word-list? Investigating word frequency and keyword extraction (pp.1–16). Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, P. (2004). Querying keywords: Questions of difference, frequency, and sense in keywords analysis. Journal of English Linguistics 32(4), 346–359.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Krzyżanowski, M., McEnery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK Press. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bale, T. (2010). The conservative party: From Thatcher to Cameron. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barlow, M. (2000). Usage, blends and grammar. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp.315–345). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bavelas, J., Chovil, N., Coates, L., & Roe, L. (1995). Gestures specialized for dialogue. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(4), 394–405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benveniste, E. (1966). Problèmes de linguistique générale. Bibliothèque Des Sciences Humaines. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1983). Intonation and gesture. American Speech, 58(2), 156–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bull, P. (2012). The microanalysis of political discourse. Philologia Hispalensis, 261, 79–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butterworth, B. (1975). Hesitation and semantic planning in speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 4(1), 75–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cienki, A. (2005a). Metaphor in the ‘strict father’ and ‘nurturant parent’ cognitive models: Theoretical issues raised in an empirical study. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(2), 279–312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2005b). Image schemas and gesture. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp.421–442). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cienki, A., & Müller, C. (Eds.). (2008). Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1(1), 49–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faucher-King, F. (2005). Changing parties : An anthropology of British political party conferences. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferré, G. (2012). Functions of three open-palm hand gestures. Multimodal Communication, 1(1), 5–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1982). Frame semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm: Selected papers from SICOL-1981 (pp.111–137). Seoul, Korea: Hanshin Pub. Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Finlayson, A., & Martin, J. (2008). ‘It ain’t what you say…’: British political studies and the analysis of speech and rhetoric. British Politics, 3(4), 445–464. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harré, R., & Langenhove, L. (1999). Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, J., & Greatbatch, D. (1986). Generating applause: A study of rhetoric and response at party political conferences. American Journal of Sociology, 92(1), 110–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horton, D., & Wohl, R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 191, 215–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kita, S. (2008). Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet. Mahwah & London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
L’Hôte, E. (2014). Identity, narrative and metaphor: A corpus-based cognitive analysis of new labour discourse (1994–2007). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010). New Labour and globalization: Globalist discourse with a twist? Discourse & Society, 21(4), 355–376. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
L’Hôte, E., & Lemmens, M. (2009). Reframing treason: Metaphors of change and progress in new Labour discourse. CogniTextes, 31, [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd Edition, pp. 202–251). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2002). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006). Thinking points: Communicating our american values and vision. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lapaire, J.-R. (2011). Grammar, gesture and cognition: Insights from multimodal utterances and applications for gesture analysis. Вісник Львівського університету. Серія філологічна, 521, 87–107.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mair, P. (1994). Party organizations: From civil society to the state. In R.S. Katz & P. Mair (Eds.), How parties organize: Change and adaptation in party organizations in Western democracies (pp.113–35). London, Thousand Oaks: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mariot, N. (2006). Le frisson fait-il la manifestation? Pouvoirs, 11, 97–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2009). Le paradoxe acclamatif, ou pourquoi les institutions n’ont pas de première fois. In F. Buton & N. Mariot (Eds.), Pratiques et méthodes de la socio-histoire (pp.169–90). Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNeill, D., Cassell, J., & Levy, E.T. (1993). Abstract deixis. Semiotica, 95(1/2), 5–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyer, C.F. (2002). English corpus linguistics: An introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Minkin, L. (1978). The Labour Party conference: A study in the politics of intra-party democracy. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, C. (1998). Redebegleitende Gesten: Kulturgeschichte, Theorie, Sprachvergleich. Berlin: Spitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2004). Forms and uses of the palm up open hand: A case of a gesture family? In C. Müller & R. Posner (Eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures, Proceedings of the Berlin conference, April 1998 (pp.233–256). Berlin: Weidler Buchverlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oakes, M.P. (1998). Statistics for corpus linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pettitt, R.T. (2012). Me, myself and I: ‘Self-referencing’ in Labour Party conference leaders’ speeches. British Politics, 7(2), 111–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rayson, P. (2003). Matrix: A statistical method and software tool for linguistic analysis through corpus comparison. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Lancaster University, Lancaster.
. (2008). From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4), 519–549. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2009). Wmatrix: A web-based corpus processing environment. Computing Department, Lancaster University. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Describing English Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G., Dorst, A., Herrmann, B., & Kaal, A. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1994). ‘Speech-handling’: The metaphorical representation of speech in gestures. A cross-cultural study. Austin (Texas): Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Zhao, Yufan & Vahid Aryadoust
2025. An automatized semantic analysis of two large-scale listening tests: A corpus-based study. Language Testing 42:3 ► pp. 312 ff. DOI logo
Adae, Eric Kwame & Godwin Etse Sikanku
2023. Mixing Business with Politics: A Framing Analysis of Sir Sam Jonah’s “Down the Up Escalator” Activist CEO Speech of April 22, 2021. In Public Relations Management in Africa Volume 2, ► pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
Vandeleene, Audrey, François Randour, Jérémy Dodeigne, Pauline Heyvaert, Thomas Legein, Julien Perrez & Min Reuchamps
2023. Metaphors, political knowledge and the basic income debate in Belgium. Metaphor and the Social World 13:2 ► pp. 269 ff. DOI logo
Rossette-Crake, Fiona
2022. Oratory as Rhetorical Practice: The Renewal of Memoria and Actio. In Digital Oratory as Discursive Practice [Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse, ], ► pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
Rossette-Crake, Fiona
2022. Oratory as Communication Setup (I): Definitions. In Digital Oratory as Discursive Practice [Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse, ], ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Perrez, Julien, François Randour & Min Reuchamps
2019. De l’uniformité du discours politique : analyse bibliométrique et linguistique de la catégorisation des discours politiques. CogniTextes 19:Volume 19 DOI logo
Reuchamps, Min, Paul H. Thibodeau & Julien Perrez
2019. Introduction: Studying variation in political metaphor. In Variation in political metaphor [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 85], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Debras, Camille
2018. Petits et grands corpus en analyse linguistique des gestes. Corpus :18 DOI logo
Debras, Camille
2021. How to prepare the video component of the Diachronic Corpus of Political Speeches for multimodal analysis. Research in Corpus Linguistics 9:1 ► pp. 132 ff. DOI logo
Legein, Thomas, Audrey Vandeleene, François Randour, Pauline Heyvaert, Julien Perrez & Min Reuchamps
2018. Framing the Basic Income: An Experimental Study of How Arguments and Metaphors Influence Individuals’ Opinion Formation. Basic Income Studies 13:2 DOI logo
Rossette, Fiona
2017. Discursive divides and Rhetorical Staging, or the transcending function of oratory. Journal of Pragmatics 108 ► pp. 48 ff. DOI logo
Rossette, Fiona
2018. Intégrer une communauté dans une autre : Barack Obama et Amazing Grace. Argumentation et analyse du discours 21 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue