Article published In: Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 4:2 (2014) ► pp.174–198
“Now everyone knows I’m a serial killer”
Spontaneous intentionality in conversational metaphor and story-telling
Published online: 22 September 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.4.2.02rit
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.4.2.02rit
Drawing on data from a series of informal conversations about public safety and police-community relations, we distinguish between a speaker’s generalized communicative intentions with respect to metaphor use and story-telling, based on what Chafe (1994, p. 145) calls “unifying ideas that persist in semiactive consciousness” and the spontaneous intentions that arise within the short-term focus or spotlight of consciousness and guide the production of actual utterances. Although speakers occasionally enter a conversation with a fixed intention to express an idea with a particular metaphor, tell a particular story in a particular style, or accomplish some other speech act, such as persuading or informing, more commonly in ordinary conversations speakers begin with only a generalized intention to engage in the social interaction, sometimes but not always accompanied by generalized intentions regarding a particular topic or a particular form of expression. We argue that these “unifying ideas” interact with the contents of the short-term focus or spotlight of consciousness to generate spontaneous communicative intentions that in turn guide the production of metaphors, stories, and other language segments. Often these spontaneous communicative intentions arise interactively in response to other participants’ utterances; sometimes they arise in response to unforeseen opportunities in the speaker’s own utterances. Consequently, in ordinary casual conversations the spontaneous communicative intentions behind metaphor, story-telling and humor are often formed ‘on the fly,’ in response to the dynamic social interaction, and sometimes as a result of collaboration with other participants.
Keywords: conversation, intentionality, humor, metaphor, discourse, story-telling.
References (42)
Abbott, H.P. (2008). The Cambridge introduction to narrative (2nd ed.). Cambridge,UK: Cambridge University Press.
Apter, M.J. (1985). Humor and laughter: An anthropological approach. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Arundale, R.B. (2008). Against (Gricean) intentions at the heart of human interaction. Intercultural Pragmatics, 5(2), 229–258.
Barsalou, L.W. (2008). Grounding symbolic operations in the brain’s modal system. In G.R. Semin & E.R. Smith (Eds.), Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches (pp. 9–42). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Brock, T.C., Strange, J.J., & Green, M.C. (2002). Power beyond reckoning: An introduction to narrative impact. In M.C. Green, J.J. Strange, & T.C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 1–15). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cameron, L.J. (Principal Investigator). (2006).
Procedure
for metaphor analysis. The Metaphor Analysis Project. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University.
Cameron, L.J. (2007). Patterns of metaphor use in reconciliation talk. Discourse and Society, 181, 197–222.
Cameron, L.J., & Deignan, A. (2003). Using large and small corpora to investigate tuning devices around metaphor in spoken discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 181, 149–160.
Chafe, W. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Coates, J. (2007). Talk in a play frame: More on laughter and intimacy. Journal of Pragmatics, 391, 29–49.
Dunbar, R. (1996). Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Everts, E. (2003). Identifying a particular family humor style: A sociolinguistic discourse analysis. Humor, 161, 369–412.
. (1999). Intentions in the experience of meaning. New York & Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
. (2011). Is ‘deliberate’ metaphor really deliberate? Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 26–52.
Gibbs, R.W., Jr., & Matlock, T. (2008). Metaphor, imagination, and simulation: Psycholinguistic evidence. In R.W. Gibbs Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 161–176). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Green, M.C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes, 381, 247–266.
Green, M.C., & Brock, T.C. (2002). In the mind’s eye: Transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion. In M.C. Green, J.J. Strange, & T.C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 315–342). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Haugh, M. (2009). Intention (ality) and the conceptualization of communication in pragmatics. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 291, 91–113.
. (2008). The place of intention in the interactional achievement of implicature. In I. Kecskes & J. Mey (Eds.), Intention, common ground and the egocentric speaker-hearer (pp. 45–86). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Negrea-Busuioc, E., & Ritchie, L.D. (In press). When ‘seeking love is travel by bus’: Deliberate metaphors, stories and humor in a Romanian song. Metaphor & the Social World, 5(1).
Norrick, N.R. (1993). Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
. (2000). Conversational narrative: Storytelling in everyday talk. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 221, 1–39.
. (2009b). Distributed cognition and play in the quest for the double helix. In H. Pishwa (Ed.), Language and social cognition (pp. 289–323). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. (2010). “Everybody goes down”: Metaphors, stories, and simulations in conversations. Metaphor and Symbol, 251, 123–143.
. (2011a). Why the block is the block: Reinforcing community through casual conversation. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(2), 240–261.
. (2011b).
Justice is blind: A model for analyzing metaphor transformations and narratives in actual discourse. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 70–89.
. (2011c). “You’re lying to Jesus!” Humor and play in a discussion about homelessness. Humor, 241, 481–511.
. (2014). “Born on third base”: Stories, simulations, and metaphor comprehension.
Paper presented at the biannual conference of Researching and Applying Metaphor (RaAM10)
, Cagliari, Italy, June.
Ritchie, L.D., & Cameron, L.C. (in press). Open hearts or smoke and mirrors: Metaphorical framing and frame conflicts in a public meeting. Metaphor and Symbol.
Ritchie, L.D., & Dyehouse, V. (2008). FINE AS FROG’S HAIR: Three models for the development of meaning in figurative language. Metaphor and Symbol, 231, 85–107.
Ritchie, L.D., & Negrea-Busuioc, E. (2014). Consciousness and intentionality in paratelic communication: On (not) taking discourse too seriously. Unpublished manuscript, submitted.
Sasson, T. (1995). Crime talk: How citizens construct a social problem. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Schank, R.C., & Berman, T.R. (2002). The pervasive role of stories in knowledge and action. In M.C. Green, J.J. Strange, & T.C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 287–314). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Tseng, Ming-Yu & Shih-Wen Chuang
Negrea-Busuioc, Elena & L. David Ritchie
Ritchie, L. David & Mariko Thomas
2015. A “bright blue ball”, “brushed with clouds” or “parched, scorched, and washed away”?. Metaphor and the Social World 5:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
