Article published In: Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 4:1 (2014) ► pp.65–89
Economic competition is like auto racing
Building metaphorical schemas when reading text
Published online: 5 May 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.4.1.04kre
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.4.1.04kre
Even though our language is pervaded by metaphor, we do not necessarily think metaphorically. Knowing whether people make conceptual connections between a source and a target domain, and if so under which conditions, is of theoretical as well as practical interest, for example in text design. This paper experimentally investigates under which conditions people build their textual representations of a news article on a metaphorical schema. To disentangle the inconclusive output of recent reaction-time studies, we conduct a memory study. We probe the effect of signaling and conventionality on textual representations — two variables which have been ignored or conflated in previous studies. We find that people are more likely to metaphorically structure their representations of a news article to the extent that it contains novel metaphorical expressions. The inclusion of similes that explicitly signal extended mappings between source and target domains may also act as an aid to integration, although our evidence for this is more equivocal. These findings are discussed in relation to the career of metaphor theory and to the role of deliberateness in metaphor processing.
References (50)
Allbritton, D. W. (1995). When metaphors function as schemas: Some cognitive effects of conceptual metaphors.
Metaphor and Symbol
, 10(1), 33–46.
Allbritton, D. W., McKoon, G., & Gerrig, R. J. (1995). Metaphor-based schemas and text representations: Making connections through conceptual metaphors.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition
, 21(3), 612–625.
Beger, A. (2011). Deliberate metaphors? An exploration of the choice and functions of metaphors in US-American college lectures.
Metaphorik.de
, 201, 39–60.
Blasko, D. G. (1999). Only the tip of the iceberg: Who understands what about metaphor?
Journal of Pragmatics
, 311, 1675–1683.
Boers, F. (1997). No pain, no gain in a free-market ideology: A test for cognitive semantics?
Metaphor and Symbol
, 121, 231–241.
Boronat, C. B. (1990).
Effects of base shift and frequency in extended metaphor processing
. M. A. dissertation, Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois.
Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor.
Psychological Review
, 112(1), 193–216.
Bower, G. H., Black, J. B., & Turner, T. J. (1979). Scripts in memory for text.
Cognitive Psychology
, 111, 177–220.
Brewer, W. F., & Treyens, J. C. (1981). Role of schemata in memory for places.
Cognitive Psychology
, 131, 207–230.
Cameron, L., & Low, G. D. (2004). Figurative variation in episodes of educational talk and text.
European Journal of English Studies
, 8(3), 355–373.
Charteris-Black, J. (2004).
Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis
. Houndmills, Basingstoke; Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chiang, W.-Y., & Duann, R.-F. (2007). Conceptual metaphors for sars: ‘War’ between whom?
Discourse and Society
, 18(5), 579–602.
Gibbs, R. W., & O’Brian, J. E. (1990). Idioms and mental imagery: The metaphorical motivation for idiomatic meaning.
Cognition
, 361, 35–68.
Graesser, A. C., Millis, K. K., & Zwaan, R. A. (1997). Discourse comprehension.
Annual Review of Psychology
, 481, 163–189.
Graesser, A. C., Mio, J., & Millis, K. K. (1989). Metaphors in persuasive communication. In D. Meutsch & R. Viehoff (Eds.),
Comprehension of literary discourse; results and problems of interdisciplinary approaches
(pp. 131–154). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Hunt, H. (2004).
Shifting gears. Mexico fights for position in global race
. A Reprint from Tierra Grande. International Economy. [URL]
Johnson, M. K., Bransford, J. D., & Solomon, S. K. (1973). Memory for tacit implications of sentences.
Journal of Experimental Psychology
, 98(1), 203–205.
Keysar, B., Shen, Y., Glucksberg, S., & Horton, W. S. (2000). Conventional language: How metaphorical is it?
Journal of Memory and Language
, 431, 576–593.
Kintsch, W. (1998).
Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition
. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Towards a model of text comprehension and production.
Psychological Review
, 85(5), 363–394.
Kipfer, B. A., & Chapman, R. L. (Eds.). (2003).
Roget’s thesaurus
(6th ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
Kitis, E., & Milapides, M. (1997). Read it and believe it: How metaphor constructs ideology in news discourse: A case study.
Journal of Pragmatics
, 281, 557–590.
Kopp, R. R. (1995).
Metaphor therapy: Using client-generated metaphors in psychotherapy
. New York: Brunnel/Mazel.
Kopp, R. R., & Craw, M. J. (1998). Metaphoric language, metaphoric cognition, and cognitive therapy.
Psychotherapy
, 35(3), 306–311.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980).
Metaphors we live by
. Chicago, IL; London: University of Chicago Press.
Low, G. D. (2008). Metaphor and education. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.),
Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought
(pp. 212–230). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Low, G. D., Littlemore, J., & Köster, A. (2008). Metaphor use in three UK university lectures.
Applied Linguistics
, 29(3), 428–455.
Mannes, S. M., & Kintsch, W. (1987). Knowledge organization and text organization.
Cognition and Instruction
, 4(2), 91–115.
Meyer, B. J. F. (1975).
The organization of prose and its effects on memory
. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
1984). Text dimensions and cognitive processing. In H. Mandl, N. L. Stein & T. Trabasso (Eds.),
Learning and comprehension of text
(pp. 3–51). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Myers, J. L., O’Brian, E. J., Balota, D. A., & Toyofuku, M. L. (1984). Memory search without interference: The role of integration.
Cognitive Psychology
, 161, 217–242.
Nayak, N. P., & Gibbs, R. W. (1990). Conceptual knowledge in the interpretation of idioms.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
, 119(3), 315–330.
Pearson, P. D., Raphael, T. E., TePaske, N., & Hyser, C. (1981). The function of metaphor in children’s recall of expository passages.
Journal of Reading Behavior
, 8(3), 249–261.
Princeton University. (2010).
WordNet
. [URL].
Santa Ana, O. (1999). ‘Like an animal i was treated’: Anti-immigrant metaphor in us public discourse.
Discourse and Society
, 101, 191–224.
Steen, G. J. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor.
Metaphor and Symbol
, 231, 213–241.
2010). When is metaphor deliberate? In N.-L. Johannesson, D. C. Minugh & C. Alm-Arvius (Eds.),
Selected papers from the 2009 Stockholm Metaphor Festival
(pp. 43–63). Stockholm: Department of English, Stockholm University.
Tendahl, M., & Gibbs, R. W. (2008). Complementary perspectives on metaphor: Cognitive linguistics and relevance theory.
Journal of Pragmatics
, 40(11), 1823–1864.
Thibodeau, P., & Durgin, F. H. (2008). Productive figurative communication: Conventional metaphors facilitate the comprehension of related novel metaphors.
Journal of Memory and Language
, 581, 521–540.
Thorndyke, P. W. (1977). Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse.
Cognitive Psychology
, 91, 77–110.
van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983).
Strategies of discourse comprehension
. New York & London: Academic Press.
Whitney, P., Budd, D., & Mio, J. S. (1996). Individual differences in metaphoric facilitation of comprehension. In J. S. Mio & A. N. Katz (Eds.),
Metaphor: Implications and applications
(pp. 203–214). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cited by (22)
Cited by 22 other publications
Ahrens, Kathleen, Christian Burgers & Yin Zhong
Steen, Gerard J.
Sun, Ya, Deyi Kong & Chenmeng Zhou
Vandeleene, Audrey, François Randour, Jérémy Dodeigne, Pauline Heyvaert, Thomas Legein, Julien Perrez & Min Reuchamps
2023. Metaphors, political knowledge and the basic income debate in Belgium. Metaphor and the Social World 13:2 ► pp. 269 ff.
ÇAKIR, Cihan & Mihrali KÖSELİÖREN
Cotter, Colleen, Danniella Samos & Deborah Swinglehurst
Egg, Markus
2020. To those walking in the footsteps of the faith. In Drawing attention to metaphor [Figurative Thought and Language, 5], ► pp. 229 ff.
Cárcamo Morales, Benjamín
Reuchamps, Min, Paul H. Thibodeau & Julien Perrez
2019. Introduction: Studying variation in political metaphor. In Variation in political metaphor [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 85], ► pp. 1 ff.
Marhula, Joanna
Reuchamps, Min, Jeremy Dodeigne & Julien Perrez
Smirnova, Elizaveta & Svetlana Shustova
2018. Denominal verbs with metaphorical meanings in British business media discourse. Metaphor and the Social World 8:2 ► pp. 267 ff.
Vries, Clarissa de, W. Gudrun Reijnierse & Roel M. Willems
2018. Eye movements reveal readers’ sensitivity to deliberate metaphors during narrative reading. Scientific Study of Literature 8:1 ► pp. 135 ff.
Boeynaems, Amber, Christian Burgers, Elly A. Konijn & Gerard J. Steen
Burgers, Christian & Gerard J. Steen
2017. Introducing a three-dimensional model of verbal irony. In Irony in language use and communication [Figurative Thought and Language, 1], ► pp. 87 ff.
Thibodeau, Paul H., Rose K. Hendricks & Lera Boroditsky
Ureña Gómez-Moreno, José Manuel
2016. Refining the understanding of novel metaphor in specialised language discourse. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 22:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Krennmayr, Tina
Reijnierse, W.Gudrun, Christian Burgers, Tina Krennmayr & Gerard J. Steen
2015. How viruses and beasts affect our opinions (or not). Metaphor and the Social World 5:2 ► pp. 245 ff.
Steen, Gerard
Steen, Gerard
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
