Article published In: Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 3:1 (2013) ► pp.77–99
One small step for MIP towards automated metaphor identification?
Formulating general rules to determine basic meanings in large-scale approaches to metaphor
Published online: 15 July 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.3.1.04dor
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.3.1.04dor
The manual annotation of large corpora is time-consuming and brings about issues of consistency. This paper aims to demonstrate how general rules for determining basic meanings can be formulated in large-scale projects involving multiple analysts applying MIP(VU) to authentic data. Three sets of problematic lexical units — chemical processes, colours, and sharp objects — are discussed in relation to the question of how the basic meaning of a lexical unit can be determined when human and non-human senses compete as candidates for the basic meaning; these analyses can therefore be considered a detailed case study of problems encountered during step 3.b. of MIP(VU). The analyses show how these problematic cases were tackled in a large corpus clean-up project in order to streamline the annotations and ensure a greater consistency of the corpus. In addition, this paper will point out how the formulation of general identification rules and guidelines could provide a first step towards the automatic detection of linguistic metaphors in natural discourse.
Keywords: mapping, human/non-human, concrete/abstract, basic meanings, MIP(VU)
Cited by (11)
Cited by 11 other publications
Rashid Ali, Farrah Diebaa & Su’ad Awab
Reijnierse, W. Gudrun & Christian Burgers
Shi, Jiayi & Zhaowei Khoo
Rashid Ali, Farrah Diebaa
Rashid Ali, Farrah Diebaa
Nacey, Susan, Tina Krennmayr, Aletta G. Dorst & W. Gudrun Reijnierse
2019. What the MIPVU protocol doesn’t tell you (even though it mostly
does). In Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 22], ► pp. 41 ff.
Reijnierse, W. Gudrun, Christian Burgers, Tina Krennmayr & Gerard J. Steen
Reijnierse, W. Gudrun, Christian Burgers, Tina Krennmayr & Gerard J. Steen
2020. The role of co-text in the analysis of potentially deliberate metaphor. In Drawing attention to metaphor [Figurative Thought and Language, 5], ► pp. 15 ff.
Dorst, Aletta G. & W.Gudrun Reijnierse
2015. A dictionary gives definitions, not decisions. Metaphor and the Social World 5:1 ► pp. 137 ff.
MacArthur, Fiona
2015. On using a dictionary to identify the basic senses of words. Metaphor and the Social World 5:1 ► pp. 124 ff.
MacArthur, Fiona
2019. Linguistic metaphor identification in English as a lingua franca. In Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 22], ► pp. 289 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
